Some expect more of Barack Obama and other congressional, judicial, and media leaders than those leaders declare and exhibit. Others proclaim that the leaders are doing fine and doing more or less exactly what leaders should.
Obviously, none of them displays the absolute and infallible perfection of Jesus Christ Himself; only God is good, though some are rather and frequently commendable.
Who else do we have to rule us other than Barack Hussein Obama, his cabinet and staff, congressional senators and representatives and their advisors, plus all presently-functioning supreme and appeals and district court judges?
The plain answer is: NO one else. And we will not condone nor tolerate lawless and disruptive chaos and anarchy!
In most elective decisions, the majority wins over the minority in terms of numbers of people, which also usually means the stronger over the weaker, no matter what the numbers. It is typical of simplistic representative government, which is an easy choice between mere good or bad, strong or weak, democrats or republicans, black or white, up or down, forward or backward, red or green, and so on.
Wouldn't it be interesting, if not extremely complicated and complex, if each candidate could rule in proportion to the amount of votes he received, and according to the order of those amounts as to when and for long he ruled? But too many cooks spoil the broth? Two is company, and three's a crowd? So much for elective possibilities of minor and third parties.
Should it not be the duty of those in majority to assist the defeated as that majority defines and applies "assistance?" It behooves the victors to provide for and not tyrannize nor oppress the defeated, as much as the defeated comply with majority will and purposes.
It is amusing - then pathetic - that republicrats who so strongly supported and voted for Republican George Bush (as noble as he was in protecting Israel against antisemitic in hijab-attired iron-rule-Saddam Iraq, being against so-called "partial-birth" abortion-homicide, and against purported "same-sex" same-gender "marriage") but then who also promoted sexist-feminist shorted-skirted woman Condi Rice to National Security Advisor and then Secretary of State.....and republicrats who so vigorously campaigned for the sexist-feminist female Sarah Palin to be a candidate to become a heartbeat away from the U.S. Presidency.....would bemoan and be aghast about the feminists Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton. MUST everyone have a woman to rule over them - contrary to the Scriptures of Leviticus 27:1-5, Ecclesiastes 7:27-28, Isaiah 3:12, Nahum 3:12, First Corinthians 11:1-16, First Corinthians 14:33-38, First Timothy 2:8-15, and First Peter 3:7?
It is remarkable - then lamentable - that republicrats who supported and voted for a Republican George Bush who had the despicable and counterproductive heresy about increasing credit for borrowing, contrary to the Scripture telling us to "Owe no one anything but to love one another," would criticize and condemn Obama and associates for doing the same thing imposing a stimulus similar to what George Bush approved during his reign, though on an admittedly much larger scale.
Could not the George Bush who used executive orders to come down hard on "enemy combatants" used that same power to dismantle the ACLU, Planned Parentlessness, the AUSCS, NARAL, National Organization against Women, and so on? Perhaps not, because of demoncrat adversaries who stymied and stifled him.
Again, Obama is certainly not Jesus Christ, nor expected to perform as Jesus Christ would in terms of power and operational doctrine.
As you might recall, most Roman emporers of ancient time were far from perfect, and most of the kings of Israel as recorded in Old-Testament history were equally as deplorable. The rulers of Britain and England were substantially defective, Adolf Hitler had some good attributes and one especially despicable one, and even the Presidents of the United States had their good and bad points. Barack is no different, as were his predecessors Bush Jr, Clinton, Bush Sr, Carter, and even Ronald Reagan who did the dastardly deed of appointing feminist-sexist female Sandra Day O'Connor to the U.S. Supreme Court.
In every case, there must be a Biblically-spiritual balance of the contrasting directives of:
Romans 13:1 Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.
Hebrews 13:17 Obey your leaders and submit to them; for they are keeping watch over your souls, as men who will have to give account. Let them do this joyfully, and not sadly, for that would be of no advantage to you.
2Peter 2:9 then the Lord knows how to rescue the godly from trial, and to keep the unrighteous under punishment until the day of judgment,
2Peter 2:10 and especially those who indulge in the lust of defiling passion and despise authority. Bold and wilful, they are not afraid to revile the glorious ones....
Luke 11:19 And if I cast out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your sons cast them out? Therefore they shall be your judges.
Luke 11:20 But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.
Luke 11:21 When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own palace, his goods are in peace;
Luke 11:22 but when one stronger than he assails him and overcomes him, he takes away his armor in which he trusted, and divides his spoil.
Acts 5:29 But Peter and the apostles answered, "We must obey God rather than men."
In the case of the "fatherland" Nazis and their horrendous cremation-in-concentration-camps racist misbehavior, it took the stronger international force of mostly males of the Allies along with a few female nurses, kilt-and-queen-ruled brits, (plus atheistic "motherland"-defending russians) to overcome a stable, established, and disciplined German government. Consider nowadays the nuclear-powers-capable disciplined male military leadership and orderly civilians comprising North Korea and Iran. A combination of the economic forces of the United Nations and European Union might be the only way to try to insure global security against wacko kamakazi-like/genocidal-murdering terrorists.
So WHO do the republicrats have to offer instead of the present Obama administration? Clearly, weak-talking war-handicapped compromiser McCain was not on par with the confident Obama and Barack's charismatic and confident, hope-and-change-rhetoric, pleasing orations. And who would be able to equal or outshine him competitively in 2012? Anti-denominational republicrats were prejudiced against the slick and handsome Mormon Romney. Thompson was too stately and old-fashioned for them. Huckabee was too flippantly and frightenly religious for prujudiced anti-religious republicrats, their anti-religious fears, and superstitious apprehensions. Instead of Obama's ecumenical embrace of all major religions, republicrats chose exclusion against all professing religion....to their demise and humiliating subjugation.....and yet continue to do.
Meanwhile, republicrats plan on partying in Washington DC and Las Vegas, pimping to the high rollers while raising attendance fees for such extravagances way beyond the meager financial reach of well-intentioned would-have-been religious-fundamentalist supporters. The consequences of such will become apparent in the elections of 2010.
Meanwhile, the foreboding disaster of electing feminist racist, no-term-limitation, Presidential equivalent Sonya Sotomayer to the Highest Court in the land looms in the very-near future, and feminist-headed Homeland Security is one accidental or deliberate disaster away from indiscriminately censoring and squelching bogeymen-scapegoat genuine-Christian activists along with certain arrogant, snotty, and loud-mouthed morality-despising pro-feminist and anti-modesty radio and TV "conservative" talk-show hosts.