Cut To Die?

As of this writing, it has been reported in national network TV, radio, and newsprint media that Mitt Romney [supposedly] has about 80+ delegates (far more than remaining GOP presidential candidates Newt Gingrich, bigoted-against-islamic-women-attire? homogays-non-discriminating, other-candidates-accusator Rick Santorum, and mere-economics-professor Ron Paul).

Contests in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Florida have taken place, so far.

Both pseudo-"democrat" and pseudo-"republican" secular-networks mediapeople are spotlighting and giving undue significant publicity coverage and attention to Mitt Romney, as are talkshow hosts of both so-called "conservative" and somewhat-subversive "liberal" radio.

Why that is, is a combination of media favoritism of media monguls themselves toward allegedly-"lowest-common-denominator" "everyone-rally-around-big-tent" Romney (as they failed to rally around big-tent compromising boring losers Dole and McCain), and the fact that Romney can sort of force the media (as much as he needs to) to promote himself because of his massive monetary resources, compared to his closest opponent Newt Gingrich.

Many people are not that much interested in the presidential political race, although a substantial number of people are interested - as indicated by them soon and urgently talking about it to friends, neighbors, acquaintances, and others.

Various special-interest groups, superpacs, and influence peddlers have and continue to come out with current (and supposedly-"accurate") popularity polls, expressing not only their own preferences in accord with specific and selected people they claim that they have interviewed, with the generally-non-admitted intention of persuading and convincing others who view the EVER-changing polls and variating percentages to join in with you're-a-stupid-outsider-if-you-don't preferences of both the pollsters themselves and the network media publicizing those polls.

Frequently, pollsters are so biased in their selection of respondents, along with similarly-prejudiced secular network broadcast and newsprint mediapersons who publicize such partialities, that they [like Newt's former wives] cannot be completely trusted as to how all or most people, people in general, and people across the entire spectrum, actually feel about their own non-duressed and non-misrepresented likes and dislikes regarding and concerning presidential candidates, economic and social issues, and other considerations.

Let me also express some of my gut feelings about how I analyze the present presidential candidates and issues, both Democrat and Republican.

First of all, no major news network newscaster or reporter, nor anyone of the Obama administration, has (to my knowledge) EVER aired and discussed the obvious, thoroughly-web-documented, copiously-proven-to-be-deceptive-and-dishonest nature of the replacement "long form" of lying-Obama's purported Hawaiian Birth Certificate. Nor have they aired or discussed the easily-web-accessible photocopy of his actual and bonafide Mombasa Kenya Birth Certificate relating to the childbirth-emergency admitting of Obama's twice-divorced then-pregnant mother into Coast Province General Hospital when visiting in Kenya.

Most in and of the secular and jewishly-cultic TV and radio network media have simply done a complete blackout on that crucial birther issue which clearly would be the chief factor disqualifying Liar Obama from being re-elected President -- if not to prematurely terminate his presidency by impeachment requiring tentative rule by VP Joe Biden before the 2012 General Election.

When confronted with the Birther Issue, most secular and religiously-cultic TV and radio-media co-conspirators have pooh-poohed even the suggestion of not accepting the [fake Hawaiian] "birth certificate" as valid, and have roundly reviled, belittled, chastised, and ridiculed those who bravely persist in trying to put the issue out into general-public honest and forthright exposure on network TV and radio.

Secondly, very few (although more and more courageous patriots) have and continue to express not merely concern but outright hostility toward Obama and his Pelosi/Reid/etc. demoncrat/republicrat cohorts for, even though [sarcastically] Barack has done so much for me and my fellow Christians:

* anti-Scripturally nominating and having appointed two inferior-gender feminists with pro-abortion-choice proclivities into the High Court (similar to McCain and his feminist-sexist RINOs shooting themselves in the foot by appointing inferior-gender feminist Sarah Palin to be snobbish-loser-McCain's VP running mate in 2008);

* snubbing Netanyahu and criticizing Israeli settlements;

* forbidding the State Department from claiming that Jerusalem in the capital of Israel;

* secretly and forcefully legislating non-affordable-against-the-poor so-called "Affordable Health Care Insurance" imposing Individual-Mandate Obamascare and funding it by robbing $500 billion from Medicare;

* without Congressional approval, appointing health-care discrimination-and-rationing czars;

* letting environmental lunatics prevent drilling for oil on the dubious grounds of specious endangered-species, global-warming, and air-pollution irrationalizations;

* allowing Hillary and Al Qaeda operatives to destablize Egypt and Libya;

* cowardly murdering bin Laden without trial;

* deserting Iraqis and angering both the Taliban and Pakistanis;

* strangling small business owners with red-tape over-regulation;

* lauding Planned Parenthood abortion-homicide-conspiring pseudo-sex-educators;

* brown-nosing homogay-activist perverts; and

* condoning Wall-Street-protester anarchists throughout major cities in America.

it thus should be quite obvious why media pollsters state that frighteningly-scary Barack "Barry Soetoro" Hussein Obama has an Approval Rating of 50% compared to Romney's 30%, or 60% compared to Gingrich's 30%.

Understandably [and sarcastically], being that there is now an Obominite chicken in every pot, all unemployment has been completely eradicated, the National Debt has been totally canceled, cancer exists no more, negroes finally rule on all federal and state levels, China has ordered all chinese restaurants to no longer charge Americans anything for chinese buffets, Apple/Macintosh employees globally have declared Microsoft to have The Worldwide Standard for operating systems, Al Qaeda has offered to rebuild the Trade Towers, the rich pay all taxes for the poor, and the entire world is at peace for the first time in human history.

Actually, (and bear with me for some more now-needed sarcasm), they got it wrong. Instead, Obama has a 98% Approval Rating compared to Romney's 2%, and 99% compared to Gingrich's 1% Approval Rating - nationally. And the Sun rises in the West each morning, in view of the rumor that Adolf Hitler had said: "Tell a big enough lie long enough, and people will eventually believe it."

Thirdly, we note that although Saint Paul adjusted, like a chameleon, as much as he could to the culture he was in at the time, and the audience around him for the moment, he never did change religions (like daily changing clothes) as an apostate waffler (sometimes being christian, sometimes being islamic/muslim, sometimes being jewish, sometimes shinto/buddhist, sometimes hindu, sometimes voodoo) - unlike Barry "Barack Hussein Obama" Soetoro:

First Corinthians 9:19 For though I am free from all, yet I have made myself servant to all, so that I might gain the more.
20 And to the Jews I became as a Jew, so that I might gain the Jews. To those who are under the Law, I became as under the Law, so that I might gain those who are under the Law.
21 To those who are outside Law, I became as outside Law (not being outside law to God, but under the law to Christ), so that I might gain those who are outside Law.
22 To the weak I became as the weak, so that I might gain the weak. I am made all things to all men, so that I might by all means save some.
23 And this I do for the sake of the gospel [not simply for political re-election and vote-getting], so that I might share it with you.

First Timothy 6:3 If any one [like Malloy, etc?] teaches otherwise and does not agree with the sound words of our Lord Jesus Christ and the teaching which accords with godliness,
First Timothy 6:4 he is puffed up with conceit, he knows nothing; he has a morbid craving for controversy and for disputes about words, which produce envy, dissension, slander, base suspicions,
First Timothy 6:5 and wrangling among men who are depraved in mind and bereft of the truth, imagining that [Christian] godliness is a means of [political or monetary] gain.

And, it is interesting that anti-Republican legalistic-pharisee-like accusators on MSNBC have such a limited, slanted, one-sided, and misrepresentative definition against true-and-complete Christianity, which [pseudo]-christianity to them is not so much being against abortion and homosexuality as instead forcing the entrepreneurial and hardworking rich to give welfare-loafers dogs what is holy, and throw their hardworking managerial pearls before street-gang-vandalizing druggies swine. Non-selfishly helping and assisting the innocently poor is one thing, but the Supreme Christian and Leader of Christianity warned us:

Matthew 7:6 "Do not give dogs what is holy; and do not throw your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under foot and turn to attack you."

It is true that providing for the poor is expedient and expected:

Proverbs 21:13 He who closes his ear to the cry of the poor will himself cry out and not be heard.

But, did Christ Jesus not put preeminence on Himself instead of the poor when He said:

John 12:8 The poor you always have with you, but you do not always have Me.

Acts 6:2 And the twelve summoned the body of the disciples and said, "It is not right that we should give up preaching the word of God to serve tables.

Some get into trouble innocently:

John 9:2 And His disciples asked Him, "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?"
John 9:3 Jesus answered, "It was not that this man sinned, or his parents, but that the works of God might be made manifest in him.
John 9:4 We must work the works of him who sent me, while it is day; night comes, when no one can work.
John 9:5 As long as I am in the world, I [not Buddha, Gandhi, Confucius, the Dolly Lahmuh, so-called-"reverends" Sharpton/Wright/Jackson/King, nor BHO] am the light of the world."

Some get into trouble because of their own fault:

John 5:14 Afterward, Jesus found him in the temple, and said to him, "See, you are well! Sin no more, that nothing worse befall you."

And relating to whether bonafide-Christian Jesus put more emphasis on feeding and healing the poor than on sexual social-issues morality, we read:

Matthew 5:32 But I say to you that every one who divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, makes her an adulteress; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.

Matthew 15:11 It is not what goes into the mouth defiles a man, but what comes out of the mouth, this defiles a man.
12 Then the disciples came and said to Him, "Do you know that the [MSNBC?] pharisees were offended when they heard this saying?"
13 He answered, "Every plant which my heavenly Father has not planted will be rooted up.
14 Let them alone; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit."
15 But Peter said to Him, "Explain the parable to us."
16 And He said, "Are you also still without understanding?
17 Do you not see that whatever goes into the mouth passes into the stomach, and so passes on?
18 But what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this defiles a man.
19 For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, [mopheaded-females CNN/FOX-sourced?] adultery, [indecently-hairstyled-women FOX/CNN-sourced?] fornication, theft, [MSNBC-sourced?] false witness, [MSNBC-sourced?] slander.
20 These are what defile a man; but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man."

Luke 9:60 But He said to him, "Leave the dead to bury their own dead; but as for you, go and proclaim the kingdom of God."

John 6:26 Jesus answered them, "Truly, truly, I say to you, you seek Me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves.
John 6:27 Do not labor for the food which perishes, but for the food which endures to eternal life, which the Son of man will give to you; for on Him has God the Father set his seal."

If actual and suitable employment is in fact both available and truly accessible, Newt's plan of 'work not welfare' for indolent-leecher freeloaders (be they pigmentally negroid or not) has merit:

Ephesians 4:28 Let the thief no longer steal, but rather let him labor, doing honest work with his hands, so that he may be able to give to those in need.

It is diabolically despicable that RINOs who support Romney (the same type of Establishment Republicans who promoted presidential-candidate losers Bob Dole in '96 and John McCain in '08) don't instead pay the media to force them to air YouTube videos of Romney in his earlier years adamently supporting "a woman's right to choose" and his yet-insistence that he will not discriminate against [homo]-gays.

Instead of exposing Romney's weaselword-tricky flipfloppiness, they expect conservatives to flock around him as THE one-and-only-God-given choice and Holy Savior to politically beat Obama in debates and the General Election of 2012 . . . while condemning and disqualifying media-backtalker Gingrich - who has (in stark and sharp contrast to waffling and non-trustworthy fortune-hiding capitalist Romney) specifically and openly told the American his more-or-less detailed plans to bring us back to the economic recovery and morality of the Reagan years . . . while the self-righteous, indecently-mopheaded-female-reporteresses, holier-than-thou media lambasts Newt with hypocritical invasively-personal attacks of Gingrich "deserting" his carelessly-disease-acquiring cancer-ridden first wife and "disowning" his questionable-character second with divorce.

They fail to remind themselves that Ronald Reagan was divorced before he married his ultimate wife Nancy, and have failed to put Barney Frank out of the House and into jail for his homosexual shenanigans and payoffs to homogays when congressman.

And yet they condemn consistent-on-sexual-issues stable-moral-stances Gingrich for his supposed Mortal Sin of virtual Hollywood-actors/actresses-reminiscent harem-type polygamy - forgetting that King David not only committed adultery with Bathsheba and remained King, but continued on with several wives and concubines besides, within that sacred-Hebrew, greater-than-American-democracy theocracy in the polygamous tradition of Abram and Jacob, Gideon, and more.

Being that Romney is flushed with affluent RINO support, and has massive Bain-Capital-and-other financial resources, he can afford to force the network media to air his anti-Gingrich hate ads while safely chiding Obama for not having been adequate in preparation for Barack's pardonable-and-welcomed retirement from Executive Office. Gingrich cannot force the RINO-controlled network media to air rebuttal ads, being that he does not have the money to do so.

What can come to his aid is dependence upon Christ Jesus, being that "Who is he who overcomes the world, but he would believes that Jesus is the Christ?"

Certainly, a Joseph-Smith-on-par-with-Jesus Mormon like Romney who believes that both Jesus and Satan were simply heavenly brothers and created-being sons of God cannot claim that assistance from the Lord.

Admittedly, a Catholic convert like Gingrich has some noxiously-apostate-heretic cultic-catholic baggage if he espouses maryolatry, purgatory, papal infallibility, and falsely-canonical apocrypha.

But, alas, according to accursed-liar and idiot-subversive Mike Malloy - contemporary of Maddow, Schultz, Hartmann, and more - [Catholic] Newt "hates women" (by default, being that Malloy stated during the evening broadcast on AM 950 on 03 Feb 2012 that "Catholics hate women") . . . which is obvious, being that Newt married Callista [a human female], as his did his two previous voluntarily-married wives (who were also women) being that Catholic men have used Catholic women and Catholic women have used Catholic men in virulent hatred to sexually and intimately create such large families because [according to Malloy] of their intense hatred against each other, although Catholic men have (according to Malloy's illogic) forced Catholic women to have sex with Catholic men [maybe also vice-versa?] and robotically have no free will of their own to either be affectionately submissive or arrogantly insubordinate to those Catholic husbands of theirs, plus police and courts are never available for escape.

"And," Malloy or his associates might continue, "what really proves that Newt - as a Catholic - discriminates against and hates women . . . is that he has not yet publicly stated that Jesus should have born female, chosen twelve female disciples, that there has never yet been a female Pope, and the verses in the New-Testament's 1st epistle of Saint Paul to Timothy chapter 2 verses 12 through 14 stating that women are not allowed to teach men but should instead be silent because Adam was formed first and that he was not deceived but Eve became a transgressor, should instead read that men are not allowed to teach women but men should be silent because Eve was formed first and that she was not deceived but instead Adam first took the Forbidden Fruit and thus became the first transgressor."

Perhaps Malloy will next blatter, on one of his nightly insights, that the Moon is brighter than the Sun, gravity repels instead of attracts things, and the Sun rises in the west each morning. It's just a matter of time, but I am not waiting to hear him say it, after he ordered me to cut him off my e-mailing list.

Speaking of the Moon, keep in mind that they who conquer the Moon conquer the Universe . . . and Newt simply does not want atheistic ruskie nor chinko commies to get the upper hand.

It could be that Malloy was forced as a child to be legalistically religious when he saw no sense in that and wanted to compete against it by thereafter presuming that all Christians and the Christian God they willfully love and willfully obey (as much as they do) are liars and do not keep their word to disown Malloy when Malloy expressed desire to be disowned and cut off? Now, more and more, he sees that not only I but the God I espouse have and continue to cut him off per his request, and repentance is now perhaps coming hard for him.

At any rate, I neither pray for Malloy nor against him, and not even about him, except in a general-humanity petition for everyone. Still can't get myself to pray for Satan, but merely about him.

In accord with Solomon's proverb: "A good name is better than riches," Gingrich's truly-evangelical and authentically-Biblical supporters can do much to compensate and make up for the high-powered forces of demonic demoncrat and republicrat evil aligned and arrayed against him.

Proverbs 19:22 What is desired in a man is [non-Romney-windsniffing?] loyalty, and a poor man is better than a ["Hawaiian"-birth-certificate?] liar.
Proverbs 22:1 A good name is to be chosen rather than great riches, and [Newt-supportive?] favor is better than [Romney's-nontaxed-offshore-Cayman-Island?] silver or gold.

Something that both Newt and his devout and fervent followers must take into consideration is the need to relentlessly keep reminding people that Newt's label of Obama being "The Foodstamp President" along with Newt's expressed intention to gradually do away with and abrogate wasteful and irresponsible entitlements (which in the minds of some people consist of illegal-alien Social Security, Medicare, Food Stamps, Student Loans, and so forth), is in fact a realization that both the elderly American citizens and disabled American citizens are severely and irreparably dependent upon continuous monthly Social Security checks (which they have legally earned) and full-Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement on a federal (and not merely insufficient state) level.

Such, unfortunately, even transcends Newt's clear and non-compromising stances against homosexuality and abortion, his credentials as a God-dependent [although females-in-charge suggestive] Catholic, his respect for [absurdly-appointing-Sandra-Day-O'Connor] Ronald Reagan, his history of being instrumental in causing a Balanced Budget with democrats during the Clinton regime, and his business experience under the Barney-Frank/Chris-Dodd Mortgage-Lender housing fiasco.

Newt is a strong and feisty leader, compared to apologetical but potentially indignant and subtly-malicious-against-political-enemies Mitt Romney, but in order to not frighten people about the entitlements issue, he (and his true-Christian activists) - again - have to amply reassure voters as soon as possible that he will almost swear to God - his Catholic Creator - that vital, expedient, and needed entitlements such as crucial monthly Social Security checks and Medicare reimbursements will continue - unlike his overly-publicized broken "in sickness and in health" promises made to his perhaps-understandably?-divorced wives.

First Corinthians 7:12 To the rest I say, not the Lord, that if any brother has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she consents to live with him, he should not divorce her.
First Corinthians 7:15 But if the unbelieving partner desires to separate, let it be so; in such a case the brother or sister is not bound. For God has called us to peace.

The rhetoric of Gingrich to "replace foodstamps with paychecks" is well-worded, but in the minds of many people (including yours truly) such rant contains insidiously-dangerous implications. Actual paychecks are one thing, but the inference is that entitlements will be cut (i.e. grandma will be thrown under the bus) and replaced by a pie-in-the-sky-by-and-by sadistically-non-realistic order from yuppie young republi-snots to "go out and find a job."

This webauthor, before retirement, vainly tried that job-search thing repeatedly . . . only to be ignored and disregarded over and over and over and over and over and over again until he gave up and decided to claim early retirement - thus "work for Uncle Sam" (i.e. get on Social Security at age 62, rather than waiting until full retirement age of 66, in which case he would have to work eight years past age 66 to make up for what he had not gotten if he would not have retired at age 62).

More than a mere "safety net," and far more than a luxury "hammock" for the irresponsibly-languid, certain so-called "entitlements" are vital lifeboats expedient to use to escape away from the sinking oceanliner.

Rumors come and go that a few Americans are starting to find and get jobs from regulatorily-hamstrung and bravely-cautious employers willing to offer jobs . . . not because of, but rather in spite of, the anti-Christian-morality Obama administration. But the credit for suggestions of such ripples of desperation-employment here and there goes not to demoncrats wanting to tax, abort, and homosodomize people into bankruptcy, foreclosure and both shameful and miserable extinction . . . but instead credit is given to citizen Tea Partiers and even myself puffing and voting in House Republicans elected in 2010 who ousted far-worse-than-George-Bush Pelosi and similar ilk from her tyrannical perch as Speaker -- all of who functioned as a needed rod for the back of fools, putting "the fear of God" into insensitive democrat oppressors, so that they began (because of applied political/governmental force) to get their act together for the good of everyone. Hopefully, our blessed Grinch will do so even more if elected President in 2012.

Certain deplorably-naive GOP irrationally-idealist social-engineering nutjobs (Medved? Hewitt? Even Prager and Bennett, Hannity, and especially Gallagher?) who expect those languishing in hospice to "get off their lazy butts" and go out to try to find a job, or become corporate entrepreneurs overnight - demonically deprived of life-sustaining Social Security checks and Medicare reimbursements - not only deserve to see Obama the Socialistic Tyrant get re-elected, but even deserve to burn in eternal Hellfire forever.

That Cut-Entitlements-and-Instead-Go-Find-A-Job will be THE main point of attack that Obama and his Democrats will use against Gingrich if Newt becomes the GOP nominee after the coming months, caucuses and primaries with accumulating delegate count.

And that will be THE Fatal Wound, unless dealt with enough and adequately, which will cause some to go 3rd Party plus be the cause of Obama getting re-elected President in 2012.

Cut "entitlements" without realistic recourse and replacement, thus causing the deprived destitute to die? May it not be!

So, my tentative declaration (at the time of this writing) is to endorse Newt Gingrich - instead of Romney, Santorum, or Ron Paul. If Newt was no longer in the race, I would support Santorum. If Santorum was no longer running, I would both reluctantly and non-enthusiastically support Romney. If Romney was no longer running, I would endorse Ron Paul instead of Obama. If Ron Paul chose a female VP running mate, I would vote 3rd party.