Yours truly has heard on at least two very recent occasions some of the brainwashing-lapdogs Obamanite network media blatter that "the American people twice elected Obama into office, Congress approved Obamascare, and the Supreme Court upheld it legally."

Their half-lie tricky-semantics deceptive statement should be quite evident for what it is and trying to do -- but only to the non-prejudiced, wise, non-biased, and impartial.

ONLY about HALF of americans voted in foreign-born Barack/Barry/Barack Hussein Obama/Soetoro/Obama into office - twice.

ONLY about HALF of Congress (both the Senate and House) voted for NON-affordable and NON-workable, previous-healthcare-policies-destroying, Medicare-disrupting Obamascare.

ONLY about HALF the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Obamascare as a quasi-"legal" tax imposition.

NOT all! NOT "everyone!" NOT unanimous - by FAR! NOT even close!

Obama has recently stated: "If you don't like my policies, win an election."

"Hey, Barack, it takes two to tango.

Since you acknowledged that "some" people do not like your policies, and you inwardly knew that they never ever did when you were campaigning for office, you had a responsibility to not even run for office at all, especially being that you, in your campaigning rhetoric, inferred and implied that you would "unify and unite America."

It's sort of like a mophead saying to hapless victims she is about to visually terrorize and sexually harass, or currently is visually terrorizing and sexually assaulting with her indecent and pornographic loose-long-hair hairstyle: "If you do not like my overly-erotic hairstyle and it bothers you, stay out of my way or else make yourself blind" -- when she herself should have gotten out of their way so as to never have lewdly assaulted them in the first place."

Currently, being considered chief candidate for Beast or False Prophet is one multi-languages-fluent apostate-catholic-plus-cultic-islamic [two-horned] U.N./E.U.-combo personage with the name of the contemptible-and-not-constitutionally-qualified-to-be-President Kenyan-born liar-in-chief Barack Hussein Obama (the sum of whose 6+7+5 first and middle and last alphabet-lettered names when calculated adds up to the same total as 6+6+6).

Fascinating how even patsy ignorant or fearful members of the "christian?" and certainly political community repeatedly mis-credential masterfully-bloviating rhetoricist Obama or Barack Obama or Barack/Barry/Barack Hussein Obama/Soetoro/Obama with the non-deserved title: "The President."

And even government figures such as former House-Speaker Tom Daschle and former-Senator John Edwards and Barack Obama have (like Satan himself blurbilizing and blattering truncated Bible verses in the desert when he tempted Jesus) have defiantly quoted such Scripture in their belligerent-Israel-reminiscent arrogance as:

Isaiah 9:10 "The [9112001] bricks have fallen, but we will build with dressed stones; the sycamores have been cut down, but we will put cedars in their place."

. . . instead of:

Second Chronicles 7:14 If my people who are called by My name humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.

Sometimes, a person's worst critics are their best advertisers, particularly if the gripes are groundless.

It shows that the accusers are focusing and paying attention to their target, instead of completely ignoring him as if he does not even exist.

Such is somewhat the case with Barack's critics, particularly those brave geniuses dissertating on conservative talk radio stations.

Durbin and Schumer foolishly want such condemnatory critics silenced with a backdoor Non-Fairness-Doctrine Anti-Conservative-Diversity Anti-Public-Interest Censorship Bill or Act forced through Congress.....clearly a non-Constitutional shenanigan to stifle and suppress free speech and freedom of the press.

As long as there is reasonable rationale for conservative talk-show hosts to harp on the questionable rulings and appointment of who they miscalled "the President," Hewitt, Rove, and Limbaugh should be able to inform the public interest (which the thinking public would and do indeed find interesting) to expound on the issues involved, in the light of:

Proverbs 12:16 The vexation of a fool is known at once, but the prudent man ignores an insult.
Matthew 5:11 Blessed are you when men revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account.
Luke 6:22 Blessed are you when men hate you, and when they exclude you and revile you, and cast out your name as evil, on account of the Son of man!
First Peter 2:23 When he was reviled, he did not revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten; but he trusted to him who judges justly.
First Peter 3:16 and keep your conscience clear, so that, when you are abused, those who revile your good behavior in Christ may be put to shame.

Understandably, when Obama legislates pro-abortion executive orders, and appoints racist and over-reactive, pro-abortion-choice women to his White House cabinet and retains feminist Pelosi as Speaker, there is obviously place and opportunity for well-founded critique and criticism against such murderous and anti-reproductive tyranny. How is he any better than McCain-Palin would have been?

So people find constructive debate not simply entertaining, but very useful for the cause of true and genuine justice:

Proverbs 14:12 There is a way which seems right to a man, but its end is the way to death.
16:25 There is a way which seems right to a man, but its end is the way to death.
18:17 He who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.

In fact, the demeaning deviancy and diabolical motivation behind the restrictive statute that Durbin and cohorts want to impose against conservative talk-show hosts probably is related to such Scripture as:

Micah 2:6 "Do not preach" --thus they preach--"one should not preach of such things; disgrace will not overtake us."

Romans 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and wickedness of men who by their wickedness suppress the truth.

Second Timothy 3:8 As Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so these men also oppose the truth, men of corrupt mind and counterfeit faith.

Second Timothy 4:3 For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings.

Durbin, Schumer and their ilk are in fact wrongly disparaging and reviling the conservative talk-show hosts, which hosts Lord has designated to get His message out to the public interest, and thus show the "true" colors of Durbin and similar subversives:

Second Peter 2:10 . . . Bold and willful, they are not afraid to revile the glorious ones.

Jude 1:8 Yet in like manner these men in their dreamings defile the flesh, reject authority, and revile the glorious ones.
Jude 1:10 But these men revile whatever they do not understand, and by those things that they know by instinct as irrational animals do, they are destroyed.

It appears that Chuck Schumer and his fellow travelers may have actually precipitated the IRS scandal with another letter threatening legislative action:

Hon. Douglas H. Shulman, Commissioner Internal Revenue Service
Room 3000 IR
1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Dear Commissioner Shulman:

We write to ask the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) to immediately change the administrative framework for enforcement of the tax code as it applies to groups designated as “social welfare” organizations. These groups receive tax and other advantages under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code (hereinafter, “IRC” or the “Code”), but some of them also are engaged in a substantial amount of political campaign activity. As you know, we sent a letter last month expressing concerns about the 501(c)(4) issue; an investigation this week by the New York Times has uncovered new, specific problems on how c)4)s conduct business. We wanted to address those new concerns in this letter.

IRS regulations have long maintained that political campaign activity by a 501(c)(4) entity must not be the “primary purpose” of the organization. These regulations are intended to implement the statute, which requires that such organizations be operated exclusively for the public welfare. But we think the existing IRS regulations run afoul of the law since they only require social welfare activities to be the 'primary purpose' of a nonprofit when the Code says this must be its 'exclusive' purpose. In recent years, this daylight between the law and the IRS regulations has been exploited by groups devoted chiefly to political election activities who operate behind a facade of charity work.

A related concern, raised in a March 7th New York Times article, concerns whether certain nonprofits may be soliciting corporate contributions that are then treated by the company as a business expense eligible for a tax deduction. The Times wrote: “Under current law, there is little to no way to tell whether contributions are being deducted, especially because many of the most political companies are privately held.” This potential abuse distorts the objectives of vital revenue mechanisms and undermines the faith that we ask citizens to place in their electoral system.

We propose that the IRS make three administrative changes to curtail these questionable practices and bring IRS tax regulations back into alignment with the letter and spirit intended by those who crafted the Code:

First, we urge the IRS to adopt a bright line test in applying its “primary purpose” regulation that is consistent with the Code’s 501(c)(4) exclusivity language. The IRS currently only requires that the purpose of these non-profits be “primarily” related to social welfare activities, without defining what “primarily” means. This standard should be spelled out more fully by the IRS. Some have suggested 51 percent as an appropriate threshold for establishing that a nonprofit is adhering to its mission, but even this number would seem to allow for more political election activity than should be permitted under the law. In the absence of clarity in the administration of section 501(c)(4), organizations are tempted to abuse its vagueness, or worse, to organize under section 501(c)(4) so that they may avail themselves of its advantages even though they are not legitimate social welfare organizations. If the IRS does not adopt a bright line test, or if it adopts one that is inconsistent with the Code’s exclusivity language, then we plan to pursue legislation codifying such a test.

Second, such organizations should be further obligated to document in their 990 IRS form the exact percentage of their undertakings dedicated to “social welfare.” Organizations should be required to “show their math” to demonstrate that political election activities and other statutorily limited or prohibited activities do not violate the “primary purpose” regulation.

Third, 501(c)(4) organizations should be required to state forthrightly to potential donors what percentage of a donation, if any, may be taken as a business expense deduction. As the New York Times reported in its March 7tharticle, some of these organizations do not currently inform donors whether a contribution is tax deductible as a business expense at all.

The IRS should already possess the authority to issue immediate guidance on this matter. We urge the IRS to take these steps immediately to prevent abuse of the tax code by political groups focused on federal election activities. But if the IRS is unable to issue administrative guidance in this area then we plan to introduce legislation to accomplish these important changes.

Sincerely,

Senators Charles E. Schumer, Michael Bennet, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jeff Merkley, Tom Udall, Jeanne Shaheen and Al Franken

Source: Senator Charles E. Schumer

Bottom line:

It is a no-brainer to understand that the politically-appointed leadership and lower level employees of Administrative Agencies are afraid of Members of Congress who can affect their mission, staffing, and most importantly, their budget. So, one can easily believe that Schumer’s letter could serve to encourage high-level officials to instruct their lower-level employees to create programs, checklists and guidelines that address congressional concerns. Leading to the appearance of hyper-partisanship and wrongdoing.

There is little or no doubt in my mind that the IRS crossed a forbidden political and ethical boundary with its program implementation - but, lower level bureaucratic employees do not take these drastic actions without direct or indirect guidance from their superiors. So the blame clearly falls on those pushing for IRS action - e.g. Chuck Schumer, Al Franken, and the other hyper-partisan ideologues in the Obama Administration who were trying to curtail the flow of funds into Republican coffers.

Charles Schumer Voting Record:

Voted NO on restricting UN funding for population control policies. (Mar 2009)
Voted NO on defining nonborn child as eligible for SCHIP. (Mar 2008)
Voted NO on prohibiting minors crossing state lines for abortion. (Mar 2008)
Voted NO on barring HHS grants to organizations that commit abortions. (Oct 2007)
Voted YES on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Apr 2007)
Voted NO on notifying parents of teens who get out-of-state abortions. (Jul 2006)
Voted NO on criminal penalty for harming preborn womb babies during other crime. (Mar 2004)
Voted NO on banning during-birth abortion homicde except for maternal life. (Mar 2003)
Voted NO on maintaining ban on military-base abortions. (Jun 2000)
Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice-for-abortion-homicide voting record. (Dec 2003)
Expand embryonic stem cell research. (Jun 2004)
Expand pregnancy-prevention mechanisms for low-income women. (May 2006)
Rated 0% by the NRLC, indicating a pro-choice-for-abortion-homicide stance. (Dec 2006)
Provide emergency human-species-extinction pregancy-prevention contraception at military facilities. (Apr 2007)
Supports both federal abortion funding & judicial activism. (Aug 2010)
Protect the anti-reproductive aberrations of women. (Jan 1993)
Ensure access to and funding for temporary-sterilization contraception. (Feb 2007)
Focus on preventing species-perpetuating pregnancy, plus emergency contraception-interference pregnancy-inhibitors. (Jan 2009)
Emergency anti-species-reproduction contraception at all military health facilities. (Dec 2009)

Moody’s explains hitting the debt limit shouldn’t be confused with default. “We believe the government would continue to pay interest and principal on its debt even in the event that the debt limit is not raised, leaving its creditworthiness intact,’ the memo says. ‘The debt limit restricts government expenditures to the amount of its incoming revenues; it does not prohibit the government from servicing its debt. There is no direct connection between the debt limit (actually the exhaustion of the Treasury’s extraordinary measures to raise funds) and a default.”

Well, the Senate has passed legislation to fund the government (probably until mid January) and give the Congress more time (likely until February) to negotiate a longer term package on the debt ceiling. It’s not optimal by any means, but given where we are (with the government shutdown and looming debt ceiling), it’s better than the alternative.

The good news is that the Budget Control Act (BCA) will remain in place, which has been effective in controlling discretionary spending over the past two years. The bad news is that we still haven’t addressed so-called entitlement, or mandatory spending, which is the main driver of our debt and unfunded liabilities.

Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born liar-in-chief and pseudo-"christian" nigherr (the "h" is silent) Barack Hussein Obama is very much like a disgruntled terrorist fired from a job then taking it out on former fellow employees by suddenly gunning them all down genocidally.

Simply because his cancer-filled mother did not get the insurance to cover the expense for her medical treatment, which probably would not have done any good anyway, the non-constitutionally-qualified imposter "president" is on a satanic crusade to punish all Americans by taking away their stable health-insurance policies and Medicare provisions and replacing them with death-panel-czars-regulated non-affordable and non-workable Obamascare, in senseless retaliatory mindless revenge for the supposed sake of his now-thankfully-deceased racist-rebel mother who did not have enough sense to marry someone of her own skin color, proving herself a wayward bitch by causing her first husband to become a drunk and self-destruct in a car accident, then re-marrying some Indonesian named Soetoro only to faithlessly divorce him, then deceptively attempting to artificially make her son Barack into an American citizen by loophole technicalities in Hawaii.

Obamination (comprised of Obama and his Senate and other democrats) has become well aware that the good guys nationwide (comprised of John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Eric Cantor, Jeff Sessions, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Rand Paul, Icorigin, the American people in general, God, etc.) -- despise the incessant and tricky-worded attempts by Obamanite mediapersons (such as Matthews, O'Donnell, Cooper, Maddow, Axelrod, Trippi, etc.) to brainwash the populace to accept funding for non-affordable non-workable Obamascare, short-circuiting Medicare provisions and present health-plan policies -- do NOT want funding for eventually-to-be-repealed Obamascare (to the rabid disdain of Schumer, Hoyer, Durbin, Pelosi, Reid, Chris Van Hollan, etc.).

So, demoncrats and their patsy Obamanite network media are now trying to subtly slide Obamascare funding through without referring to it at all and silently engrained within a vaguely-worded non-detailed Debt-Ceiling End-The-Shutdown Omnibus Budget Bill emanating from the Senate democrat majority.

They will not mention the "n-word" nor the "f-word" and now not even the "o-word" (i.e. Obamascare) either.

Being that Hitlerian/non-FDR Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born-and-thus-constitutionally-non-qualified imposter-"president" Barack/Barry/Barry Hussein Obama/Soetoro/Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Shumer, Dick Durbin, Van Hollen, various other legislators, MSNBC and other propagandists, plus nationwide Obomanites/Obominites) have been obstructing and continue to obstruct justice as virtual fire-starting anti-government-services arsonists, terrorists, traitors, treasonous, anarchists, and overall anti-Tea-Party pouting and bloviating-brat pigs, perpetuating the shutdown they themselves have caused by insisting that Boehner bring to the House floor a dirty omnibus bill funding the Non-Affordable Non-Working fiasco called Obamascare, and thus are holding the American people hostage by their dangerous and diabolical non-willingness to negotiate and compromise, a few words from Scripture regarding (and not "concerning") de facto shadow/replacement-president House-Speaker John Boehner and his shadow cabinet (Eric Cantor, Mike Lee, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Mitch McConnell, etc.) are of value to consider:

Psalm 20:9 Give victory to the king, LORD; answer us when we call.
Psalm 21:7 For the king trusts in the LORD; and through the continual love of the Most High he shall not be moved.
Psalm 33:16 A king is not saved by his great army; a warrior is not delivered by his great strength.
Psalm 45:1 . . . I address my verses to the king; my tongue is like the pen of a ready scribe.
Psalm 45:5 Your arrows are sharp in the heart of the king's enemies; the peoples fall under you.
Psalm 45:11 and the king will desire your beauty. Since he is your lord, bow to him;
Psalm 45:15 With joy and gladness they are led along as they enter the palace of the king.
Psalm 61:6 Prolong the life of the king; may his years endure to all generations!
Psalm 63:11 But the king shall rejoice in God; all who swear by Him shall glory; for the mouths of liars will be stopped.
Psalm 72:1 A Psalm of Solomon. Give the king your justice, God, and your righteousness to the royal son!

Proverbs 14:28 In a assemblage of people is the glory of a king, but without people a prince is ruined.
Proverbs 14:35 A servant who deals wisely has the king's favor, but his wrath falls on one who acts shamefully.
Proverbs 16:10 Inspired decisions are on the lips of a king; his mouth does not sin in judgment.
Proverbs 16:13 Righteous lips are the delight of a king, and he loves him who speaks what is right.
Proverbs 16:14 A king's wrath is a messenger of death, and a wise man will appease it.
Proverbs 16:15 In the light of a king's face there is life, and his favor is like the clouds that bring the spring rain.
Proverbs 19:12 A king's wrath is like the growling of a lion, but his favor is like dew upon the grass.
Proverbs 20:2 The dread wrath of a king is like the growling of a lion; he who provokes him to anger forfeits his life.
Proverbs 20:8 A king who sits on the throne of judgment winnows all evil with his eyes.
Proverbs 20:28 Loyalty and faithfulness preserve the king, and his throne is upheld by righteousness.
Proverbs 21:1 The king's heart is a stream of water in the hand of the LORD; He turns it wherever He will.
Proverbs 22:11 He who loves purity of heart, and whose speech is gracious, will have the king as his friend.
Proverbs 24:21 My son, fear the LORD and the king, and do not disobey either of them;
Proverbs 25:5 take away the wicked from the presence of the king, and his throne will be established in righteousness.
Proverbs 25:6 Do not put yourself forward in the king's presence or stand in the place of the great;

Proverbs 29:4 By justice a king gives stability to the land, but one who exacts gifts ruins it.
Proverbs 29:14 If a king judges the poor with equity his throne will be established forever.

Ecclesiastes 2:12 So I turned to consider wisdom and madness and folly; for what can the man do who comes after the king? Only what he has already done.
Ecclesiastes 5:9 But in all, a king is an advantage to a land with cultivated fields.
Ecclesiastes 8:2 Keep the king's command, and because of your sacred oath be not dismayed;
Ecclesiastes 8:4 For the word of the king is supreme, and who may say to him, "What are you doing?"
Ecclesiastes 10:20 Even in your thought, do not curse the king, nor in your bedchamber curse the rich; for a bird of the air will carry your voice, or some winged creature tell the matter.

Song of Solomon 7:5 Your head crowns you like Carmel, and your flowing locks are like purple; a king is held captive in the tresses.

Attrition warfare is a military strategy in which one side attempts to win a war by wearing down its enemy to the point of collapse through continuous losses in personnel and materiel. The war will usually be won by the side with greater such resources. The word attrition comes from the Latin root atterere to rub against, similar to the "grinding down" of the opponent's forces in attrition warfare.

Isaiah 40:31 but they who wait for the LORD shall renew their strength, they shall mount up with wings like eagles, they shall run and not be weary, they shall walk and not faint.

- https://cdccmn2.tripod.com/pastview.htm
- https://cdccmn2.tripod.com/default.htm
- https://cdccmn2.tripod.com/profplan.htm
- https://cdccmn2.tripod.com/theorder.htm