It has been stated in Scripture:

First Corinthians 2:9 But, as it is written, "What no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of humans conceived, what God has prepared for those who love Him."

The converse is also true:

What no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of humans conceived, what God has prepared for those who hate Him.

We have heard the ridiculous expression: "War is Hell."

In reality, no situation of war even comes close to what Scripture describes Hell is. War doesn't even "scratch the surface."

At least in war, one can move around a little. See things. Hear things. Escape from, by death. Intense pain from being wounded by being shot, riddled with shrapnel, having an arm or leg blown off, or being burned by a flamethrower. . . is only temporary.

Not so about Hell.

Hell is like forever being deep underground in a cave with all the lights off. Being suspended in that outer darkness perpetually with no ground or floor to stand or sit on. Burning in invisible flames yet flesh constantly being renewed for more to burn, in complete soundlessness and silence - except for one's own voice wailing in the never-ending solitary confinement. No food. No drink. Hunger unsatisfied. Thirst unquenched. Everlasting regret without relief and reconciliation. Eternally -- with no hope whatsoever for relief or escape.

It's bad enough when we have a severe cold or the flu, consigned in bed to groan in gross discomfort with a runny or stuffed up nose, sore throat, blocked ears, getting up to vomit into the toilet every so often while severely shaking for becoming chilled until we get back into bed, sweating profusely and thus soaking bed clothes, sneezing incessantly and snotting into Kleenix, doing diarrhea into the pot over and over until we're dehydrated and limp with weakness, wiping our rear-ends raw -- pathetically and pitifully beset with deep bronchial cough, and raspy voice similar to that of throat-cancer-cursed pro-"President"-Hawaii-conspiracy-theory Michael Medved [and what would admitted-Christian/anti-homogay Gov. Rick Perry think of that?], then confined to bed until we're well. Indescribably and hideously boring. Can't even get up and do anything creative to "take our mind off it." Simply languish there in bed, and drink copious amounts of water until we're sick of it. Useless to ingest "cold tablets" - such only mask the symptoms and do not cure anything. Have to wait until our own God-given body immune-system antibodies do their resurrection-like job to gradually restore us back to health, and that takes time and cannot be rushed nor accelerated.

Infection that ravages our bodies because of non-asked-for contagious germs assaulting us from the outside is similar to the substantially-paraphrased scenario mentioned by St Paul in Romans chapter 7 in which the former rule-and-atonement-by-law husband of health dies and the initially-childless-Ruth-and-Abigail-reminiscent widow now belongs to the new libertarian husband of imposed illness (and thus "violates her first pledge" of faithfulness, according to RSV's First Timothy 5:12):

Romans 7:1 Do you not know, brethren (for I am speaking to those who know the law) that the law is binding on a person only during his life?
7:2 Thus a married woman is bound by law to her husband as long as he lives; but if her husband dies she is discharged from the law concerning the husband.
7:3 Accordingly, she will be called an adulteress if she lives with another man while her husband is alive. But if her husband dies she is free from that law, and if she belongs to another man (as a "black widow" against him also?) she is not an adulteress, (but not imitating the example of Anna the prophetess):

Luke 2:36 And there was a prophetess, Anna, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher; she was of a great age, having lived with her husband seven years from her virginity.

Romans 7:4 Likewise, my brethren, you have died to the (first husband who loved you?) through the body of Christ, so that you may (quasi-adulterously?) belong to another (new husband, and thus re-marry against my future advice in First Corinthians 7:39-40?), to Him who has been raised from the dead in order that we may bear fruit for God.(?)
7:5 While we were living in the body, sinful germs, invading the body, were at work in our members to bear fruit for miserable illness.
7:6 But now we are discharged from infection, immune against that which held us captive, so that we serve not under the old written code of sickness and its unpleasant manifestations, but new Spirited healthy life.
7:7 What then shall we say? That the body is sin? By no means! Yet, if it had not been for the body, I should not have known snotting. I should not have known what it is to snot if the body had not said, "It is preferable to not snot."
7:8 But germs, finding opportunity in the body, wrought in me all kinds of snottiness. Apart from the body germs lie dead.
7:9 I was once healthy apart from germs, but when the contagious germs came, infection revived and I got sick;
7:10 the very body which promised life proved to become sick to me.
7:11 For germs, finding opportunity in the body, deceived me and by it ravaged me.
7:12 So the body is holy, and the immune system is holy and just and good.
7:13 Did my immune system which is good, then, bring sickness to me? By no means! It was contageous germs, working infection in me against my body parts which are good, in order that contagious germs might be shown to be contagious germs, and through the body might become devastating plague beyond measure.
7:14 We know that the healthful law is spiritual; but I am carnal, sold under infected-sickness sin.
7:15 I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what [health] I want, but I do the very [sick] thing I hate.
7:16 Now if I do what I do not want, I agree that the body is good.
7:17 So then it is no longer I that do it, but germs which reside within me.
7:18 For I know that nothing healthy resides within me, that is, in my infected flesh. I can will what is recuperative, but I cannot do it.
7:19 For I do not do the health I want, but the sickness I do not want is what I do.
7:20 Now if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I that do it, but germs which reside within me.
7:21 So I find it to be a principle that when I want to be healthy, sickness lies close at hand.
7:22 For I delight in the healthful body of God, in my inmost self,
7:23 but I see in my members another intruder causing me to succumb to sickness which is at war with the law of my desire for health and making me captive to the law of infection which resides in my members.
7:24 Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death?
7:25 Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, I of myself serve the law of God's fit of health with my mind, but with my flesh I temporarily serve the law of infected sickness.

When we read what can safely be described as non-pornographic "sexually-oriented" passages in Scripture, it behooves us to read only and exclusively what the precise given Text actuallystates -- and not errantly nor heretically presume or presuppose what our lamentably but honestly somewhat-erotically-polluted minds add, subtract, concoct, and/or fabricate.

Job 13:7 Will you speak falsely for God, and speak deceitfully for Him?

Romans 3:4 By no means! Let God be true though every man be false, as it is written: "That you be justified in your words, and prevail when you are judged."
Romans 9:6 But it is not as though the word of God had failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel...

Second Corinthians 4:2 We have renounced disgraceful, underhanded ways; we refuse to practice cunning or to tamper with God's word, but by the open statement of the truth we would commend ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God.

For example, I have read the commentary of one fellow in a nearby Baptist church near where I live who wrote that the monogamous phrase of "husband of one wife" in:

First Timothy 3:2 Now a bishop must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, sensible, dignified, hospitable, an apt teacher...

and:

First Timothy 3:12 Let deacons be the husband of one wife, and let them manage their children and their households well...

....to him (and propagandized to others for essentially demonic brainwashing) meant that harem polygamy is forbidden for not only bishops or deacons, but also and mostly means that a man should be faithful in the complete true fidelity to his singular wife.

But the Text does not precisely state that, does it? Nor does it does mean that -- contrary to what the fellow wrongly infers.

That is not to infer that there are indeed Scriptures commanding us to be faithful to our spouses (be they full-legal-status wives or common-law/non-State-registered concubines of our own):

Malachi 2:15 Has not the one God made and sustained for us the spirit of life? And what does He desire? Godly offspring. So take heed to yourselves, and let none be faithless to the wife of his youth.

When words of Scripture are read, it is absolutely vital that we do NOT follow the meanderings and misassertions and non-authorized additions and subtractions and revisionism of apostates who satanically "read into" actual and given words of the Text with devious misapplications against relegating the truth they refuse to accept into irrationalizations excused as "symbolism" or "metaphor" or "figurative allegory."

Instead, given and Divinely-inspired words of the TRUE-translation Text mean EXACTLY what the precise words state - nothing more and nothing less- which (in so many words) logically mean (in this case) that harem polygamy is forbidden for [only] a bishop or deacon - something in one sense totally separate from the concept of marital fidelity and faithful to a singular wife.

Elephants are not oranges on trees, and nails are not light bulbs. Or whatever. Even though elephants and oranges on trees are lifeforms, and both nails and light bulbs contain metal in at least partial composition, they are two completely different things, are not to be misregarded as symbolically nor metaphorically nor figuratively nor allegorically the same or even remotely similar.

The cause of why that fellow misinterprets those two verses in First Timothy is probably because he has wickedly relegated the idea of harem polygamy (such as done by Abraham, Jacob, Gideon, Elkanah who produced Samuel, David, Solomon, and possibly even Hosea) to something evil and damnable -- but which multiple-wife/concubine polygamy of a man (even a chief man) does God ever call "evil" anywhere in the entire Holy Bible.

The mis-assessment of that baptist fellow is quite likely based upon his "fear-of-man," cowering and caving in to sexist feminists, which cowardly compromising is fortunately not in any way a perverted chauvinistic part of the blessed patriarchal culture of islamic muslims of Saudi Arabia, Iran, parts of Africa, and other such Middle Eastern countries where male harem polygamy is not only legal and allowable, but in certain cases encouraged and expected.

The following applies to not only arab sheiks, but so-called "christians" in America and Europe and elsewhere globally:

Second Timothy 2:15 Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a workman who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth.

And if chauvinistic feminists-suckholing perverts in the U.S. do not comply with that, then:

Acts 13:46 And Paul and Barnabas spoke out boldly, saying, "It was necessary that the word of God should be spoken first to you. Since you thrust it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, hey, we turn to the nations.

Paul was rescued by military Roman-soldier Gentiles when armaments-lacking disbelieving "jewish" civilians turned on him.

On to another point.

I heard the fireball preacher associated with the program Walk in the Word state that there will be "no marriage in Heaven." Yet, did he also state that "spouses" will recognize each other in Heaven and "have a perfect relationship with each other?" If he did, and those individuals are call "spouses in Heaven" by him, it (of logical necessity) is most obvious that those "spouses" will [yet] be "married" to each other there....or they would have not been called "spouses in Heaven" by him. Yes?

Of course. The exact words of Holy Writ definitively prove that the physical death of either a husband, or a wife (or concubine) of that husband, is not equivalent to an automatic divorce - in spite of the non-Scriptural words of "...till death do us part..." which exact words are not found in any part of The Holy Bible but which typically are mouthed during many earthly wedding ceremonies.

The tricky word in that phrase is: "part" - and what is by "part?" Divorce? Annulment? Legal separation? Or instead simply what St Paul inferred by stating:

First Corinthians 7:5 Do not refuse one another except perhaps by agreement for a season, that you may devote yourselves to prayer; but then come together again, lest Satan tempt you through lack of self-control.

Indeed. In fact, it is an eternal command of the Lord (and not simply Paul) that:

First Corinthians 7:10 To the married I give charge, not I but the Lord, that the wife should not separate from her husband
First Corinthians 7:11 but if she does, let her remain single or else be reconciled to her husband -- and that the husband should not divorce his wife.

Always, and forever -- in the never-ending marital relationship permanence intended by the Almighty, because:

Matthew 19:6 So they are no longer two but one flesh. Who therefore God has joined together, let not humans put asunder."
Mark 10:9 Who therefore God has joined together, let not humans put asunder."

And that "put asunder" part means that humans (even by the physical death of one or both of them) are forbidden to break or pull apart the marital relationship cemented or welded together by the LORD Himself!

That being the case, what is meant by the following?

Matthew 22:30 For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.
Mark 12:25 For when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven.

It does NOT read: "they are not married in Heaven if they were married on Earth."

What is meant is only what THE given words of Matthew 22:30 and Mark 12:25 exactly state and precisely mean - and from that logical and realistic applications can legitimately be supposed and assumed (not presumed).

No one will be "getting married" in Heaven. No one will be giving away their daughter in a wedding ceremony in Heaven. No one will be dating for courtship purposes, nor looking to acquire a spouse, nor asking anyone to get or become or be married to them with or without fearful apprehension, nor expecting or craving anyone to ask them to get or become or be married to them, with or without wanting to. And no one in Heaven will suddenly and for whatever cause decide to divorce the spouse they already have (if they already have one).

Revelation 21:5 And He who sat upon the throne said, "Hey, I make all [or at least, most] things new." Also He said, "Write this, for these words are trustworthy and true."

"All" things "new" would be meaningless if ALL things were new and changed. In that case, we who read the Bible and expect the best could not relate to anything whatsoever. ALL definitions of ALL words would be changed into senseless and absurd gibberish.

We do not know if angels sexually reproduce, or even reproduce in non-sexual ways. Simply because it does not specifically elaborate, does not mean that reproduction in fact and in reality does not occur.

Case in point: Even though the polluted "sea will be no more," per:

Revelation 16:3 The second angel poured his bowl into the sea, and it became like the blood of a dead man, and every living thing died that was in the sea.
Revelation 21:1 Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth; for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more.

...does not mean that there will not be some ocean or oceans somewhere wherever and whenever in eternity, but does mean that drownings and tidal-wave tsunamis will no longer be a threat, a cause for fear, pain, and/or death.

For those with resurrected bodies, who will be able to eat fish like Christ could after His resurrection (and besides going through doors and walls unhindered, perhaps even urinated and defecated if He has so wanted), gone will be the erectile dysfunction, exacerbated by previous earthly years of warm-weather-immodesty-and-consequential-porn-incited abuse by self-sodomizing masturbation. Absent will be spousal apprehensive mistrust, misunderstanding, and inability to sync together in unified lovemaking procedures. Gone will be the lack of stamina and inability to recuperate. Gone will be the impatience of quick-lube-job premature and agonizing-to-restrain orgasmic ejaculation on the part of godly husbands, and the excessively-drawn-out delay to reach ultimate climax of righteous wives.

We do know that two sexually-oriented components relating to the curse given to Adam and Eve and progenie thereof in The Garden of Eden:

Genesis 3:16 To the woman he said, "I will greatly multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you." ...will not be existing in Heaven.

If female spouses of male husbands do reproduce, it will be without childbearing pain.

Regarding the "your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you" phrase does not mean that wives will no longer accommodate to the following:

Titus 2:4 ...and so train the young women to love their husbands and children,
Titus 2:5 to be sensible, chaste, domestic, kind, and submissive to their husbands, that the word of God may not be discredited.

...but does involve:

First Corinthians 7:34 There is a difference also between a wife and a virgin. The unmarried woman cares for the things of the Lord, that she may be holy both in body and in spirit; but she who is married cares for the things of the world, how she may please her husband.
First Corinthians 7:35 And this I speak for your own profit, not that I may throw a snare on you, but for that which is appropriate, and that you may attend to the Lord without distraction.

Will wives in Heaven yet be submissive to their own husbands, obey them, and submit to them in everything?

Ephesians 5:22 Wives, be subject to your husbands, as to the Lord.
5:24 As the church is subject to Christ, so let wives also be subject in everything to their husbands.
5:33 ...let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband.

Colossians 3:18 Wives, be subject to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.

First Peter 3:1 Likewise you wives, be submissive to your husbands, so that some, though they do not obey the word, may be won without a word by the behavior of their wives,
3:2 when they see your reverent and chaste behavior.
3:3 Let not yours be the outward adorning with braiding of hair, decoration of gold, and wearing of fine clothing,
3:4 but let it be the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable jewel of a gentle and quiet spirit, which in God's sight is very precious.
3:5 So once the holy women who hoped in God used to adorn themselves and were submissive to their husbands,
3:6 as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him 'sir.' And you are now her children if you do right and let nothing terrify you.
3:7 Likewise you husbands, live considerately with your wives, bestowing honor on the woman as the weaker gender, being that you are joint heirs of the grace of life, in order that your prayers may not be hindered.

But of course.

And will husbands no longer love their wives (and/or concubines) in Heaven?

Colossians 3:19 Husbands, love your wives, and do not be harsh with them.

Of course not.

When the Almighty gave the primal command to Adam and his already-married-to-him wife (not whoring escort or masseuse) Eve to "multiply," was that command in any way associated with sexual desire and the active potential for sexual desire, engrained in the primal pair from God the Creator? Was sexual desire therefore "sin," a satanic Act of God, and hate-God wickedness to have such engrained-from-the-Lord sexual desire? Have married couples sinned by culminating their "lack-of-self-control" sexual desire in marriage....according to Paul's First Corinthians 7 verse 36? Is marriage-resulting "lack of [sexual] self-control" Paul mentioned in First Corinthians 7:9 something inferior and undesirable, perhaps a pitiful and pathetic manifestation of mind-in-the-trash filthy inadequacy? Should men (and women) be vigorously "red-blooded" [with sexual desire] or instead blue-blooded morlock zombies with zero sexual desire? Will already-married human spouses in Heaven thus be morlock zombies with zero sexual desire in despicably sterile and boring perfect self-control, rife and reeking with angelic abstinence? Dirty minds used to shameful/secretive lustfully-lurid shenanigans of the gutter would presume so.

So, there will be no sexual desire of humans in Heaven who were already married to each other before they got there, but instead they will be sexlessly nothing but a bunch of formerly-male-or-female-but-now-genderless "angelic" eunuchs, devoid of God-given/God-blessed erotic desire, in Heaven?

Why do I have a gut feeling that prudish perverts and pervertesses who purport that sexual desire is embarrassing, ignominious, and humiliating and thus never to be found in Heaven will thankfully never be there themselves?

The question of whether abstinential sexual self-control [whether only on Earth, or also even in Heaven] is a positive or negative thing, or neither, is sort of alluded to by the words of Scripture, particularly the passage in Matthew:

Esther 2:21 And in those days, as Mordecai was sitting at the king's gate, Bigthan and Teresh, two of the king's eunuchs, who guarded the threshold, became angry and sought to lay hands on King Ahasuerus.
4:4 When Esther's maids and her eunuchs came and told her, the queen was deeply distressed; she sent garments to clothe Mordecai, so that he might take off his sackcloth, but he would not accept them.
4:5 Then Esther called for Hathach, one of the king's eunuchs, who had been appointed to attend her, and ordered him to go to Mordecai to learn what this was and why it was.
6:2 And it was found written how Mordecai had told about Bigthana and Teresh, two of the king's eunuchs, who guarded the threshold, and who had sought to lay hands upon King Ahasuerus.
6:14 While they were yet talking with him, the king's eunuchs arrived and brought Haman in haste to the banquet that Esther had prepared.

Isaiah 39:7 And some of your own sons, who are born to you, shall be taken away; and they shall be eunuchs in the palace of the king of Babylon.
Isaiah 56:4 For thus says the LORD: "To the eunuchs who keep my sabbaths, who choose the things that please me and hold fast my covenant,
56:5 I will give in my house and within my walls a monument and a name better than sons and daughters; I will give them an everlasting name which shall not be cut off.
56:6 And the foreigners who join themselves to the LORD, to minister to him, to love the name of the LORD, and to be his servants, every one who keeps the sabbath, and does not profane it, and holds fast my covenant --
56:7 these I will bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer; their burnt offerings and their sacrifices will be accepted on my altar; for my house shall be called a house of prayer for all peoples."
56:8 Thus says the Lord GOD, who gathers the outcasts of Israel, "I will gather yet others to him besides those already gathered."

Daniel 1:8 But Daniel resolved that he would not defile himself with the king's rich food, or with the wine which he drank; therefore he asked the chief of the eunuchs to allow him not to defile himself.

Matthew 19:12 For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. He who is able to receive this, let him receive it."

Acts 8:27 And he rose and went. And hey, an Ethiopian, a eunuch, a minister of the Candace, queen of the Ethiopians, in charge of all her treasure, had come to Jerusalem to worship.

Will there be publicly decent and discreet mutual spousal nudity in Heaven? Does God like to gaze upon sacred manifestations of XXX-equivalent Christian-spousal conjugative copulation?

Genesis 1:22 And God blessed them, saying, "Be fruitful and multiply and fill the waters in the seas, and let birds multiply on the earth."
Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth."
Genesis 9:1 And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth."
Genesis 9:7 "And you, be fruitful and multiply, bring forth abundantly on the earth and multiply in it." [so much for satanic impetus and advocacy for zero-population growth!]

Titus 1:15 To the pure all things are pure, but to the corrupt and unbelieving nothing is pure; their very minds and consciences are corrupted.

Hebrew 4:13 There is no creature that is not manifest in His sight, but all things are naked and open to the eyes of Him with whom we have to do.

First John 3:2 Beloved, we are God's children now; it does not yet appear what we shall be, but we know that when He appears we shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as He is.

As Batman's Robin might exclaim: "Holy X-ray Vision!"

Will husbands wash their own wives (and/or concubines)?

Ephesians 5:25 Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave Himself up for her,
Ephesians 5:26 that He might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word...

Angels have generally been messengers with sexually-oriented news from the Lord:

Genesis 16:11 And the angel of the LORD said to her, "Hey, you are with child, and shall bear a son; you shall call his name Ishmael; because the LORD has given heed to your affliction.
Judges 13:3 And the angel of the LORD appeared to the woman and said to her, "Hey, you are barren and have no children; but you shall conceive and bear a son.
Isaiah 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Hey, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
Matthew 1:21 "...she will bear a son, and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people away from their sins."
Matthew 1:23 "Hey, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and his name shall be called Emmanuel" (which means, God with us).
Luke 1:31 "And hey, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus."

And what does it take to "bear a son?" Is not genitalizing sexual intercourse, or at least seminal sperm meeting and merging with ovarian egg or equivalent, required? But of course.

"Pardon me, but do you have any Grey Poupon?"

"Perhaps."

Why will all those admonitions, directives, or precepts still be operation in Heaven -- somewhat similar to what they were on Earth in this life?

Because:

Deuteronomy 4:2 You shall not add to the word which I command you, nor take from it; that you may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.

Psalm 89:34 "I will not violate my covenant, or alter the word that went forth from my lips."
Psalm 105:8 He is mindful of his covenant forever, of the word that He commanded, for a thousand generations...

John 10:35 "If he called them 'gods' to whom the word of God came (and scripture cannot be broken)..
10:36 do you say of him whom the Father consecrated and sent into the world, 'You are blaspheming,' because I said, 'I am the Son of God'?
10:37 If I am not doing the works of my Father, then do not believe me;
10:38 but if I do them, even though you do not believe me, believe the works, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me and I am in the Father."

First Peter 1:25 ...the word of the Lord remains forever. That word is the good news [including already-married marital nudity, marital sex, and continuing marriage in Heaven?] which was preached to you.

How about spouses of which one is a believer and the other a disbeliever?

Will eternal separation occur? A type of permanent divorce? Who will belong to who, and be friends with who in glory?

Luke 8:21 But he said to them, "My mother and my brothers are those who hear the word of God and do it."

[Maybe Mother Mary (Renown Former Virgin, who supernaturally conceived without being fkd by the Spirit) might have thought, after hearing that: "That's me."]

Luke 16:26 "And besides all this, between us and you a Great Chasm has been Fixed, in order that those who would pass from here to you may not be able, and none may cross from there to us."