First of all, the XIX Amendment is misworded. The proper word is: gender - not "sex."
"Sex" has to do with sexual activities - whether normal or abnormal, heterosexual or homosexual -- but is only indirectly related to gender, as to which gender performs or instead commits such erotic actions.
Also, to not explicitly specify which 'gender' - as to who is and who is not allowed to 'vote" - would (as this webpage author sees it) in no way disallow either gender to vote or not vote (and/or, by inference, run for political office, involving whichever gender is in governmental authority over which other gender).
Lawsuits pertaining to the issue could be handled and decided upon by the United States Supreme Court.
Repealing the heresy-based, sexist and chauvenistic, 19th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (remembering that the liquor-sale-and-transport-forbidding 18th Amendment was thankfully repealed, much to the delight of Chicago Mafia bootlegger and mobster Al Capone) would have the effect of merely not encouraging either gender to vote nor run for political office, with respect to:
Leviticus 27:1 The LORD said to Moses,
2 "Say to the people of Israel, When a man makes a special vow of persons to the LORD at your valuation,
3 then your valuation of a male from twenty years old up to sixty years old shall be fifty shekels of silver, according to the shekel of the sanctuary.
4 If the person is a female, your valuation shall be thirty shekels.
5 If the person is from five years old up to twenty years old, your valuation shall be for a male twenty shekels, and for a female ten shekels.
6 If the person is from a month old up to five years old, your valuation shall be for a male five shekels of silver, and for a female your valuation shall be three shekels of silver.
7 And if the person is sixty years old and upward, then your valuation for a male shall be fifteen shekels, and for a female ten shekels.
8 And if a man is too poor to pay your valuation, then he shall bring the person before the priest, and the priest shall value him; according to the ability of him who vowed the priest shall value him.
Ecclesiastes 7:25 I turned my mind to know and to search out and to seek wisdom and the sum of things, and to know the wickedness of folly and the foolishness which is madness.
26 And I found more bitter than death the woman whose heart is snares and nets, and whose hands are fetters; he who pleases God escapes her, but the sinner is taken by her.
27 Hey, this is what I found, says the Preacher, adding one thing to another to find the sum,
28 which my mind has sought repeatedly, but I have not found. One man among a thousand I found, but a woman among all these I have not found.
29 Hey, this alone I found, that God made man upright, but they have sought out many devices.
Isaiah 3:12 My people: children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. My people, your leaders mislead you, and confuse the course of your paths.
13 The LORD has taken his place to contend, he stands to judge his people.
14 The LORD enters into judgment with the elders and princes of his people: "It is you who have devoured the vineyard, the spoil of the poor is in your houses.
15 What do you mean by crushing my people, by grinding the face of the poor?" says the Lord GOD of hosts.
16 The LORD said: Because the daughters of Zion are haughty and walk with outstretched necks, glancing wantonly with their eyes, mincing along as they go, tinkling with their feet;
17 the Lord will smite with a scab the heads of the daughters of Zion, and the LORD will lay bare their secret parts.
Nahum 3:12 All your fortresses are like fig trees with first-ripe figs; if shaken they fall into the mouth of the eater.
13 Hey, your troops are women in your midst. The gates of your land are wide open to your enemies; fire has devoured your fortresses.
First Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and there is One Mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,
6 who gave Himself as a ransom for all, the testimony to which was borne at the proper time.
7 For this I was appointed a preacher and apostle (I am telling the truth, I am not lying), a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth.
8 I desire then that in every place the men should pray, lifting holy hands without anger or quarreling;
9 also that women should adorn themselves modestly and sensibly in decent apparel, not with broided hair or gold or pearls or costly attire
10 but by good works, as befits women who profess religion.
11 Let a woman learn in silence with all submissiveness.
12 I allow no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent.
13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve;
14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.
15 Yet woman will be saved through bearing children, if she continues in faith and love and holiness, with sobriety.
First Peter 3:1 Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands, that if any of them obey not the Word, they also may be won without the Word by the conduct of their wives
2 while they observe and consider your chaste manner of living coupled with fear.
3 When adorning yourselves, let it not be that outward adorning of broiding the hair, and of wearing gold, or of putting on apparel;
4 but let it be the hidden human of the heart which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which in the sight of God is of great price.
5 For in this manner in former times the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands,
6 even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him 'master.' Ye are her daughters as long as ye do well and are not afraid with any bewilderment.
7 Likewise, ye husbands, reside with your wives with understanding, giving honor unto the wife as to the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life, that your prayers be not hindered.
If the GOP and associated Republicans and non-demoncrat Democrats (along with third-party proponents) want a majority of American voters to put a Republican in the White House in 2012, they must do BOTH of two things:
(1) they have to doggedly convey to the American people (despite the diabolically-destructive "no-entitlements" rantings and ravings of porno-mopheads-exhibiting Sean Hannity, "I-like-Obama-personally" Michael Medved, egocentrically-pontificating pseudo-rebbe-smoker Dennis Prager, etc.) that instead of depriving vital Social Security checks and full Medicare payments to the elderly (age 60+) and defaming them as 'expendable entitlements' or 'government-dependancy welfare,' they instead assure American voters that they will protect and even enhance such life-sustaining bills-paying monetary necessities to non-illegal seniors deserving such, and
(2) they have to neither promote nor select nor endorse any woman candidate to run as President OR Vice-President.
Some would retort: "Why not?" or "How do you know that?"
John 9:10 They said to Him, "Then how were your eyes opened?"
John 9:15 The Pharisees again asked Him how he had received his sight.
Does it really matter "how" or even "why?" Was Jesus required to commence an exhaustive detailed biochemical and microbiological, perhaps mass-energy-mass nucleonic-transmutation-exchange, dissertation using long Latin and other unusual scientific words as to exactly "how" He gave sight to the blind man? Would detailing such complex physiological processes and terminology have caused willfully-antagonistic and maliciously-divisive pharisaic blind fools to either accept the obvious-fact healing that clearly occurred, or persuaded them to like it?
Nevertheless, to humor the quite-stupid-and-actually-asinine tard doubters relating to the two Win-in-2012 requirements stated above, please carefully re-read the already-quoted plainly-pertinent Scripture passages of Leviticus 27, Ecclesiastes 7, Isaiah 3, Nahum 3, First Timothy 2 and First Peter 3 above.
And relating to the first pro-Social-Security-and-Medicare-payments requirement above, just one of many many similar Biblical verses should suffice for at least the belligerantly-argumentative dull of mind:
Psalm 41:1 (paraphrase) To the choirmaster. A Psalm of David. Blessed is he who considers the poor (by continuing to "donate?" (?) to him and her crucial Social-Security checks to pay residual monthly survival bills)! The LORD delivers him in the day of (2012 Election) trouble;
Now, both Obama and Harry Reid have witnessed Republicans taking over a majority in the U.S. House in the Election of 2010...which was not a dismissably-trifling event! Added to that, the Republican-controlled House recently and successfully passed a repeal against the trillion-dollar-cost Obamascare bill.
My dad used to say about his dad saying: "You don't have to knock me over with a brick wall before I fall."
With all due respect, we (in all good conscience) cannot merely label both Barack and Harry as "stupid," because generic stupidity concerning (not "regarding") blind spots is lamentably endemic to all of us:
Proverbs 30:2 Surely I am too stupid to be a man. I have not the understanding of a man.
But there comes a point where the closed-mindedness of Harry Reid, and the restrictive narrow-mindedness of Barack Obama, seriously gets to the point of almost-laughable nearly-ridiculous absurdity...and the only way to restrain such foolish hardheadedness is by overall-public-opinion, sensible-and-honest-media, and legislative and High-Court force (and we're not talking Jared-vs-Gabby here):
Second Kings 18:20 Do you think that mere words are strategy and power for war? On whom do you now rely, that you have rebelled against me?
Shrek "You...and whose army?"
Proverbs 29:1 He who is often reproved, yet stiffens his neck will suddenly be broken beyond healing.
Proverbs 29:19 By mere words a servant is not disciplined, for though he understands, he will not give heed.
Psalm 32:9 Be not like a horse or a mule, without understanding, which must be curbed with bit and bridle, else it will not keep with you.
Isaiah 26:10 If favor is shown to the wicked, he does not learn righteousness; in the land of uprightness he deals perversely and does not see the majesty of the LORD.
Isaiah 36:5 Do you think that mere words are strategy and power for war? On whom do you now rely, that you have rebelled against me?
Hosea 10:4 They utter mere words; with empty oaths they make covenants; so judgment springs up like poisonous weeds in the furrows of the field.
First Corinthians 2:4 ...and my speech and my message were not in plausible words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power...
What exactly does the GOP, and rational Americans who have no partisan axe to grind, have against Obamascare?
Basically, two aspects of the repealable bill are objectionable:
(1) The mandate of forcing everyone who does not have health insurance to purchase such, and
(2) Forcing health insurance companies to insure those with "pre-existing conditions."
Understandable and hopefully-helpful elaboration follows.
Should the government force anyone to purchase a motorized vehicle, force anyone to drive that vehicle on a public road, and force anyone to purchase vehicle insurance if they neither want to and/or do not need to purchase a motorized vehicle nor drive a purchased vehicle on a public road?
The government (and the governed) do have a compelling interest for everyone uniformly driving on the right side of a highway and stopping for stoplights. But is having State-required vehicle insurance the main reason why some people are safe and politely-courteous drivers who rarely get into traffic accidents, instead of impatient tailgaters and red-stoplight runners....or is it because doing a vehicle collision or committing a patrol-car-observed moving violation is too inconvenient for most people on busy schedules, vehicle repairs are so annoying and costly plus time-consuming and schedule-disrupting, the flashing red-and-blue lights in the rear-view mirrors too scary and embarrassing, and traffic-ticket fines levied by judges too steep?
Should the government force anyone to purchase a house (instead of, let's say, an apartment), then force them to live and stay in that house, and/or force them to insure a house if they neither purchased a house nor want to live in a house?
Should the government force people to buy something at a vending machine? Should the government force one to select a certain brand over against other brands?
Should photo I.D. be presented before one can vote? Should theft-prevention, FAIR-tax calculation, security-identification, Satan-allegiance tattoos engrained with 666 be scanned at the checkout counters and vending machines for processing purchase transactions?
Revelation 13:11 Then I saw another beast which rose out of the earth; it had two horns like a lamb and it spoke like a dragon.
12 It exercises all the authority of the first beast in its presence, and makes the earth and its inhabitants worship the first beast, whose mortal wound was healed.
13 It works great signs, even making [SDI?] fire come down from heaven to earth in the sight of men;
14 and by the signs which it is allowed to work in the presence of the beast, it deceives those who dwell on earth, bidding them make an image for the beast which was wounded by the sword and yet lived;
15 and it was allowed to give breath to the image of the beast [Data on Star Trek?] so that the image of the beast should even speak, and to cause those who would not worship the image of the beast to be slain.
16 Also it causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead,
17 so that no one can buy or sell unless he has the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name.
18 This calls for wisdom: let him who has understanding reckon the number of the beast, for it is a human number, its number is six hundred and sixty-six.
[Note than even the commercial-transactions Mark described above will NOT be forced on anyone who does not want to receive one. It is instead simply that one will not be able to commercially buy nor sell without the Department-of-Commerce incepted transactions-facilitating Mark of the Beast].
Should the government force anyone to sit on a toilet rather than stand over one? Should the government force anyone to breathe, or eat, or drink certain things? Should the government force anyone to not commit suicide?
Genesis 24:58 And they called Rebekah, and said to her, "Will you go with this man?" She said, "I will go."
Genesis 41:44 (paraphrased) Moreover [Obama] said to [Nazi Pelosi], "I am [Barack], and without your consent no man shall lift up hand or foot in all the land of [America]."
Philemon 1:14 but I preferred to do nothing without your consent in order that your goodness might not be by compulsion but of your own free will.
The designated punishment for not purchasing mandated health insurance is said to be an IRS penalty tax imposed on the future non-compliant ones. This is prepatory for local police officers going door to door with search warrants invading private homes and apartments to interrogate, arrest, cuff, and imprison probable-cause suspects presumed to not have purchased health insurace -- whenever and however, wherever, and with whomever.
Another problem with forcing people who do not really need nor can afford mandated health insurance purchase is related to the motto: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." The alleged "cure" sometimes is worse than the disease:
Second Chronicles 16:12 In the thirty-ninth year of his reign Asa was diseased in his feet, and his disease became severe; yet even in his disease he did not seek the LORD, but sought help from physicians.
Job 13:4 As for you, you whitewash with lies; worthless physicians are you all.
Mark 5:25 And there was a woman who had had a flow of blood for twelve years,
26 and who had suffered much under many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was no better but rather grew worse.
27 She had heard the reports about Jesus, and came up behind Him in the crowd and touched His garment.
28 For she said, "If I touch even His garments, I shall be made well."
29 And immediately the hemorrhage ceased; and she felt in her body that she was healed of her disease.
30 And Jesus, perceiving in himself that power had gone forth from Him, immediately turned about in the crowd, and said, "Who touched my garments?"
To get lazy and careless about personal hygiene, to abuse the body as a glutton, smoker, fornicator, sodomite, sleep-deprived party animal, faithlessly-not-trusting-Christ worrywort...and then run to the doctor, who gets accustomed to the regular residual income of the nitpicky-health-concerned paranoic who have a mentally-sick drugs-dependent obsession to over-check their bodily dipstick more than they need to....is something most people neither need nor want, nor should need nor want.
What is very troublesome is that those impoverished now who cannot afford emergency treatment are covered by general-public hospital-care provisions already provided by each of the individual states of the Union and under Medicare. So why the additional connived-and-concocted-in-secrecy, Pelosi-pushy Reid-required imposition of Obamascare? Such power-over-the-people dictators attempting non-reasonable forced control over people's lives should have and should yet leave the already-established well-functioning legacy of FDR's Social Security (not for illegal aliens nor politician pork projects to bribe voters which has depleted the Trust Fund), along with Lyndon Johnson's legacy of Medicare [minus the fraud and waste], alone and intact!
Mandatory health-insurance purchase will NOT force people to "get to work and become employed" in mundane, IRS-regulated, boring jobs.
Instead, giving the governed Social Security checks to do with as they wish for their particular unique purposes and interests, like out-of-the-box inventions and other enterpreneurial endeavors, can be VERY beneficial to a nation and its residents, plus maintenance of innovation-based military superiority for international protection.
How could those unemployed, who neither want nor really need nor can afford expensive Obama/Pelosi-Reid-mandated health insurance, bypass such oppressive tyranny (should they choose to not relocate in Iran or Saudi Arabia)?
Simple: Do not become employed with any employer who is tied into the fines-imposed-by-no-forced-health-insurance-purchase IRS grid who issues W-4 Forms, thus avoiding subjection to IRS-manipulated registered-income-reporting requirements.
Also, avoid declaring W-4 Form IRS registration for giving and receiving birthday gifts or equivalent-value barter trade at garage sales....until Obaminite law-enforcement thugs put the kabosh on that one also.
One can readily discern how such IRS-penalty fines for not purchasing health insurance will significantly increase the desire for Americans to start and get IRS-regulated jobs, thus greatly decreasing unemployment for the wellbeing of the national economy and dissolution of the gross taxable deficit. In summary, the Sun rises in the west each morning.
Should the government force people to gamble on the Wall-Street stock market? Should government force people to engage in the gambling of paying for insurance gambling? Should the government force people to participate in gambling and [insurance] gaming at casinos and Powerball?
WILL the overwhelming new monetary payouts and financial settlements doled out by forced-to-insure-lackies health insurance companies mandated by Obamascare Law given the incoming strange-and-questionable boogie-number of "30 million" people purchasing mandated health insurance and demanding payment for 'pre-existing conditions' really be offset by the of-necessity-hiked-way-up premium-payments acquired from already-insured clients?
THAT is highly doubtful, and besides raising the premium-payment rates on those already insured to pay for the vast horde claiming payouts for "pre-existing conditions" (many of whom will claim such because of various vices and/or accidents they willfully and irresponsibly committed to get sick or injured), health insurance companies would have to thoroughly revise their policies to the 30 million new clients with intricate and extensive weaselword exemptions in the fine print of the contracts.
For example, stated policy exemptions to the newcomers would consist of insurance-payout disqualification to include, but not be limited to: "disabilities because of Acts of God, war, insanity, heart attack, stroke, cancer, AIDS, disabetes, food poisoning, electrocution, traffic accident, meteorite bombardment, abortion homicide, reproductive-tract and digestive-tract and nervous-system infirmities, fire, flood, stabbing, gunshot wound, suffocation, poisoning, falling, murder, suicide, plague, etc."
That practically includes everything, and imposing such makes one wonder exactly WHAT one is insured against!
It's either that, or the health insurance companies and their nationwide personnel would have to go belly up or declare bankruptcy, and/or relocate over in Mexico or China.
That, again, would have absolutely NO effect on joblessness, nor adversely accentuate nor worsen the unemployment situation or economy or deficit in the United States. In summary, the Sun sets in the east each evening.