TEST QUESTION: Is God's natural plan for there to be one man and one woman together in marriage?

ANSWER: No.

"Say what?

Let's try again.

Is God's original plan for there to be man and ONE, and ONLY one, woman together in marriage?

ANSWER:

Genesis 16:3 So, after Abram had dwelt ten years in the land of Canaan, Sarai, Abram's wife, took Hagar the Egyptian, her maid, and gave her to Abram her husband as a wife.

So old Abe had two wives at the same time. So Sarai coerced Abe to commit bigamy? So Abe committed bigamy? So Hagar committed threesome adultery, and kids were involved? So all three are going to Hell?

Why would God provide for a bigamous(?) adulteress [i.e. Hagar] in distress?

Genesis 21:17 And God heard the voice of the lad; and the angel of God called to Hagar from heaven, and said to her: "What troubles you, Hagar? Fear not; for God has heard the voice of the lad where he is."

So God is going to Hell for complicity concerning aiding and abetting a deserting adulteress impenitent about voluntary bigamy?

He isn't the only one going there?

Moses, the Torah writer, also?

Deuteronomy 21:15 "If a man has two wives, the one loved and the other disliked, and they have borne him children, both the loved and the disliked, and if the first-born son is hers that is disliked,
Deuteronomy 21:16 then on the day when he assigns his possessions as an inheritance to his sons, he may not treat the son of the loved as the first-born in preference to the son of the disliked, who is the first-born,
Deuteronomy 21:17 but he shall acknowledge the first-born, the son of the disliked, by giving him a double portion of all that he has, for he is the first issue of his strength; the right of the first-born is his.

Sorry Moses: You'll never make it to shine in glory at the future Mount of Transfiguration with lightning-face Jesus, at least on temporary leave from Hades where you were burning therein because of your conspiracy to advocate Torah bigamy...yes?

Not only that, but two-wives-allowing God is to burn in Hell forever for contradicting Himself by disallowing acquisition of horses, silver, and gold:

Deuteronomy 17:16 Only he must not multiply horses for himself, or cause the people to return to Egypt in order to multiply horses, being that the LORD has said to you: "You shall never return that way again."

Deuteronomy 17:17 And he shall not multiply wives for himself, lest his heart turn away; nor shall he greatly multiply for himself silver and gold.

Sorry Solomon, you also were predestined for damnation, yes?

A few more are on fire in the Hades part of Sheol besides that?

First Samuel 30:5 David's two wives also had been taken captive, Ahinoam of Jezreel, and Abigail the widow of Nabal of Carmel.

Hades-burned includes Ahioam and Abigail for being involuntarily-sexually-abused bigamous adulteresses? Several husbands for Abigail, Nabal's widow? Isn't adulterous widowhood required for death-to-the-law/life-to-the-gospel salvation, according to Romans chapter 7?

First Samuel 30:18 David recovered all that the Amalekites had taken; and David rescued his two wives.
Second Samuel 2:2 So David went up there, and his two wives also, Ahinoam of Jezreel, and Abigail the widow of Nabal of Carmel.

One man and one women for him?

David and his harem comprise quite a company burning in Hades, and note all the one-woman examples?

Second Samuel 3:2 And sons were born to David at Hebron: his first-born was Amnon, of Ahinoam of Jezreel;
3:3 and his second, Chileab, of Abigail the widow of Nabal of Carmel; and the third, Absalom the son of Maacah the daughter of Talmai king of Geshur;
3:4 and the fourth, Adonijah the son of Haggith; and the fifth, Shephatiah the son of Abital;
3:5 and the sixth, Ithream, of Eglah, David's wife. These were born to David in Hebron.

All a live-then-die [or get divorced] sequence of non-simultaneous females, as with Abe and Jake? ONE man and ONE woman, indeed!

NO way!

It is thus easy to see why the Spirit included bigamous(?) Davey's writing into the Old Testament, and bigamous(?) Solomon's even more!

First Chronicles 3:1 These are the sons of David that were born to him in Hebron: the first-born Amnon, by Ahinoam the Jezreelitess; the second Daniel, by Abigail the Carmelitess,
3:2 the third Absalom, whose mother was Maacah, the daughter of Talmai, king of Geshur; the fourth Adonijah, whose mother was Haggith;
3:3 the fifth Shephatiah, by Abital; the sixth Ithream, by his wife Eglah;
3:4 six were born to him in Hebron, where he reigned for seven years and six months. And he reigned thirty-three years in Jerusalem.
3:5 These were born to him in Jerusalem: Shimea, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon, four by Bathshua, the daughter of Ammiel;
3:6 then Ibhar, Elishama, Eliphelet,
3:7 Nogah, NFirst Chronicles 3:8 Elishama, Eliada, and Eliphelet, nine.
3:9 All these were David's sons, besides the sons of the concubines...

Dave's concubines also burning in Hades for bigamy?

Bigamist Ashhur burns in Hades also?

First Chronicles 4:5 Ashhur, the father of Tekoa, had two wives, Helah and Naarah.

So Helah and Naarah are on fire there also?

"But God allowed it back then, before He capriciously changed His mind?"

Really? What else did God "allow" back then before He whimsically changed His mind?

Did God also allow urinating and breathing back then? Only in the missionary position? Or only with woman on top?

Clearly, did not God specifically and repeatedly plainly condemn, as Hell-bound sinners, polygamous Abraham, Jacob, Gideon, Elkanah, David, Solomon, etc. for their dastardly-wicked sins of bigamous polygamy, in the Old-Testament verses of....

...............in the Old Testament verses of..........................

...............well, there in the Old-Testament references of....................

......well....................................um.........................................well.........................................uh......................................................

I guess there aren't any. No kidding.

Well, isn't heterosexual bigamy of Old-Testament patriarchs the same thing as homosexuality?

No?

Why not?

What's the difference between progenie reproduction by heterosexual bigamy and offspring reproduction by homosexual monogamy? Explain it to me. The threat of humankind extinction is at stake!

God eventually and finally forbade Christian men in the New Testament from being bigamous, clearly proven by the following verses?

First Timothy 3:2 Now a bishop must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, sensible, dignified, hospitable, an apt teacher...
First Timothy 3:12 Let deacons be the husband of one wife, and let them manage their children and their households well...

See, every Christian man is a bishop and deacon at the same time? No?

Every Christian man is either a bishop or deacon? No?

All bishops and deacons symbolize all Christian men? No?

Certainly the following passage in Ecclesiastes is of the Devil?

Ecclesiastes 2:8 I also gathered for myself silver and gold and the treasure of kings and provinces; I got singers, both men and women, and many concubines, man's delight.

Right there one can easily see that that concubines-acquisition remark was enough to cause Solomon to burn in Hell forever, correct?

No "one" man and "one" woman for Abraham, Jacob, Gideon, Elkanah (father of Samuel), David, Solomon, Rehoboam, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.

All burning in Hell for bigamy, right? Something God once allowed, but no longer allows for non-bishops and non-deacons, for some strange, weird, goofy, and mysterious reason, right? So the non-dependable change-His-mind fickle God also must burn in Hell forever, yes?

Moses also allowed divorce in the Torah, for hardness of heart. So Moses burns in Hades for that also? Jesus Himself allowed divorce, so He also is to burn in Hell forever?

Matthew 19:9 And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another, commits adultery."

Advocating divorce is advocating divorce - no matter what the "unchastity" excuse, yes?

Another thing:

"Love your enemies, and pray for [not merely "about"] them.

Really?

Let's see.

Second Timothy 4:14 Alexander the coppersmith did me great harm; the Lord will requite him for his deeds.

A plain and simple prayer by Paul for Alexander. Yes?

David prayed for Goliath?

First Samuel 17:26 And [polygamous?] James Bond [excuse me: David] said to the men who stood by him: "What shall be done for the man who kills this Philistine, and takes away the reproach from Israel? For who is this uncircumcised Philistine, that he should defy the armies of the living God?"
17:27 And the people answered him in the same way: "So shall it be done to the man who kills [not "murder?"] him."
17:36 "Your servant has killed both lions and bears; and this uncircumcised Philistine shall be like one of them, seeing he has defied the armies of the living God."
17:37 And David said: "The LORD who delivered me from the paw of the lion and from the paw of the bear, will deliver me from the hand of this Philistine." And Saul said to David: "Go, and the LORD be with you!"
17:41 And the Philistine came on and drew near to David, with his shield-bearer in front of him.
17:42 And when the Philistine looked, and saw David, he disdained him; for he was but a youth...
17:43 And the Philistine said to David: "Am I a dog, that you come to me with sticks?" And the Philistine cursed David by his gods.
17:44 The Philistine said to David: "Come to me, and I will give your flesh to the birds of the air and to the beasts of the field."
17:45 Then David said to the Philistine: "You come to me with a sword and with a spear and with a javelin; but I come to you in the name of the LORD of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel, whom you have defied.
17:46 This day the LORD will deliver you into my hand, and I will strike you down, and cut off your head; and I will give the dead bodies of the host of the Philistines this day to the birds of the air and to the wild beasts of the earth; that all the earth may know that there is a God in Israel.

Is it not obvious that David prayed for his enemy Goliath, and wished him the best by kindly promising to decapitate him? No?

Jesus prayed for His enemy Judas Iscariot? No?

Matthew 26:24 "The Son of man goes as it is written of him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! It would have been better for that man if he had not been born."
Mark 14:21 "For the Son of man goes as it is written of him, but woe to that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! It would have been better for that man if he had not been born."

Notice the compassion. The overwhelming display of loving affection. Can you think of a better prayer for someone than that?

Of course not.

Most persons you see walking around baring their legs with shorts are destined to burn in Hell forever.

Most [albeit somewhat mindlessly] do it deliberately - let's be honest - fully aware, underneath it all, that they are being impiously and irreligiously worldly in perhaps subconscious obedience and accommodation to the wicked "prince of the power of the air" at St Paul stated it:

Ephesians 2:1 And you he made alive, when you were dead through the trespasses and sins
Ephesians 2:2 in which you once walked, following the course of this world, following the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience.
Ephesians 2:3 Among these we all once lived in the passions of our flesh, following the desires of body and mind, and so we were by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind.

Let's interview some of them.

ME: Hey, you with the face, why are you exposing your naked legs wearing shorts in general mixed-gender public view instead of wearing long non-shortened slacks?

THEM: Who the hell are you? Is it any business of yours? Are you sexually harassing me? What are you, some kind of a pervert, or prude? Buzz off.

ME: You did not answer my question. WHY are you exposing your naked legs wearing shorts instead of wearing full-length non-shortened slacks?

THEM: Duh, it should be obvious to you that it's the style this time of year during warm summer weather. Is there something wrong with that?

ME: You suggested that, not me, so why did you suggest it to be wrong?

And is that it? Have any more irrationalizations, such as: "I'll die of heatstroke unless I expose my nude legs to visually-sensitive men I am not currently married to but nevertheless senselessly titillating and enticing them for sex by semi-nude exhibitionism" or: "I do not want to sweat but stay cool so I never again have to shower all summer even once, nor wash my sweaty shorts?"

THEM: Not really. I know I won't die of heatstroke if I wear long pants. Consider those crazy muslim women lethally suffocating themselves with scarves, shawls and robes, so no wonder they are all in intense painful discomfort and walking around dead! I know that I'll shower every day or so no matter what I wear.

I wear seasonal shorts because it's the demonic style to flaunt my legs nudity as an adulterously-appearing whore-lookalike to seduce men I do not really want to seduce, which men themselves probably do not want to be turned on by the sight of my nude legs and have no desire to thus sexually use me in logical response to the non-asked-for legs seduction.

If I wear long pants, Satan's accusers will question me as to whether I am doing the damnable thing of intending to be religiously chaste and pure, decent and holy. They won't tolerate that, but instead will relentlessly bother and criticize me, maybe get me fired from my job for being a puritanical idiot or wacko nutcase, not invite me to their orgy parties, ridicule me on Facebook, and maybe boycott me into isolated oblivion after getting the police to arrest me for disturbing the peace and disorderly conduct by disruptively exhibiting non-indecent decent exposure.

ME: I see. But don't you realize that you in your adulterous-like come-on are going to burn in Hell forever unless you go home now and change into long slacks to wear in general public view so as to quit irritating and visually assaulting married and even single-men victims?

THEM: God is too kind and forgiving for that. He's unconditional love and forgiveness. He lets it, and a lot more, slide. James 2:13 = For judgment is without mercy to one who has shown no mercy; yet mercy triumphs over judgment. We're forever saved by grace through faith, not of our own works. We're clothed in the righteousness of Christ, and covered by the blood of the Lamb. So let's not judge by outward appearances, nor legalistically nitpick about trifles, OK?

ME: Well, why be ashamed of imposing the defiling sight of parts of your God-given body? Did He not tell you to arrogantly, rebelliously, defiantly, luridly, and publicly flaunt whatever you want, according to:

Isaiah 47:1 Come down and sit in the dust, virgin daughter of Babylon; sit on the ground without a throne, daughter of the Chaldeans! For you shall no more be called tender and delicate.
Isaiah 47:2 Take the millstones and grind meal, put off your veil, strip off your robe, uncover your legs, pass through the rivers.
Isaiah 47:3 Your nakedness shall be uncovered, and your shame shall be seen. I will take vengeance, and I will spare no human?

THEM: I always thought that God and His prophet were abusive dirty old men with their minds in the gutter.

ME: Because of pornie cowardly compromisers who crave public legs-baring, shamefully dishonoring by lewdly displaying certain should-always-be-clothed-when-in-public body parts among themselves as it states in Romans chapter 1, who fear humans and not the Lord, the sacred and hallowed Way of Truth will be blasphemously maligned, as it states in Scripture:

Second Peter 2:2 And many will follow their licentiousness, and because of them the way of truth will be reviled.