Recently, there has been much ado about e-mailed spam on the internet.
Web giants Yahoo and Lycos allow spam (that is: non-wanted commercially-oriented e-mailed messages) to be put on their free e-mail accounts, and most recipients find such massive assemblage of spam an intolerable nuisance. Earthlink disruptively requires e-mailers to be screened with a code before allowing any e-mails from them (whether commercially-oriented, or not) to get through, wasting the time of many e-mailers. The best and fastest, no-spam-advertisements, free e-mail is http://fastmail.fm with virtually no spam but thankfully allowing everything else to get through quite nicely. Fastmail resoundingly knows how to properly do that and so does it.
Not only the non-discrimination of Yahoo and Lycos e-mail is appalling, but also their lack of adequate and precise user-friendly procedure and mechanism to target, specify, and sift out what spam e-mail is excluded in contrast to what personal and individual e-mails (controversial or not) and what mass-mailed e-mails (controversial or not) get through.
Simply limiting the number of same-message bulk-mailed political or religious messages sent by e-mail is NOT the answer (a lamentable limitation of Fastmail), nor is the irritating and tedious Yahoo and Lycos prohibition of requiring the keyboard typist to type in very-hard-to-read weird-lettered keyword codes for each and every e-mail consisting of the same political or religious message, for their stated intention of "preventing spam." So there is NO needed discretion by Yahoo and Lycos to allow mass-mailed political or religious message not of a commercial nature, and that is disgusting.
But spam is free, like usually-obnoxious commercials interrupting airwave (and now cable) TV programs is free. [Along those lines, we here in the Twin Cities have Comcast, which not only charges cable customers fees for subscriptions, but then perhaps gets a cut of the programming fees they charge to program providers and commercial sponsors Comcast broadcasts, besides being one of the major telephone service providers in the metro area, thus being a sort of monopoly to mandatorily utilize].
If one is so bored that he or she has nothing else to do but see and respond to spam as the spammer intended in their quest to try and make money while upsetting people who do not want to be solicited, then such non-asked-for advertisements are not unwanted to them and they have ample opportunity to go for it.
Which gets us to the subject of spamsex.
Spamsex is lewd and licentuous enticement of deliberately or non-intentioned visual sex freely purpetrated by female humans who deliberately, carelessly, or ignorantly force it into the view of hapless male victims in general public view for whatever demonic mass-confusion anti-social purposes, but not necessarily of a commercial intention (although it certainly can become so - with perhaps corresponding accusation of "soliciting for prostitution," "sexual harassment," "abuse," or "assault").
There are basically four types of FREE sex, two of which can be considered to be "spamsex" (because of their partially-solicited and non-solicited characteristics):
1. Turning on the airwave-broadcast-programming TV or cable-broadcast-programming TV and being suddenly and relentlessly attacked visually and audibly by no-warning-given impossible-to-pre-edit-and-avoid immodest and sexist quasi-pornography imposed within serial or movie programs themselves, and especially during impossible-to-immediately-edit frequently-back-to-back-to-back commercials.
One solution to avoid such quicker-than-the-remote-control-switching-hand, visual and audible, sexual-filth attack of lewd and defiling harassment, is to rent or buy a videocassette (though not non-editable DVD) of whatever programming is desired to be seen, which already is devoid of noxious commercial inserts, then - using two video tape recorders - edit out objectionable parts of the media production while viewing it the first time through, simultaneously preserving a record of only the decent parts.....unless one can get a pre-edited version which some other trusted person has sanitized, having previously taken the brunt of the porn assault himself.
2. Getting the annually-recurring free sex show of publicly-mopheaded hairstyle, naked arms bared with sleeveslessness during seasonably warm weather, nude legs bared with slacksless shorts or shortened skirts, nude feet and toes bared with sockslessness....not simply quaranteened to public beaches anymore.
3. Getting into more graphic-nudity porn websites loaded with sharp color .jpg photos and .mpg movies of completely ["birthday-suit"] naked (facially and figurewise)-attractive young women. Such is significantly more difficult now at Twin-Cities public libraries with their quite-efficient anti-porn filtering, but still available at non-filtered wi-fi hotspots and on Comcast/Qwest home internet throughout the metro area.
4. Signup up with Adult Friendfinder on the internet as an access to discovering and meeting available and willing gals in the local community for private one-on-one free sex (which "free" sex might include a dinner out or movie before the free sex). [The phenomenon of must-pay-a-pricey-fee-for metro-area masseuse and escort harlots is also available, but obviously not considered to be free spamsex].
There are apparent advantages and disadvantages to all four free-sex types listed above.
The first two types are what sensible and honest, genuinely-Christian men (and even competed-against truly-Christian women) would consider a largely NON-controllable public-nuisance/indecent-conduct immodesty (and thus: free spamsex) - thoroughly repugnant, yet pseudo-"legally" imposed across-the-board terroristically against everyone without proper discrimination nor law-enforcement arrests and citations. Such lasciviousness of mopheadedness, sleeveslessness, slackslessness, and socksless is a clear violation against the Revised Standard Version and New American Standard Version renditions or contexts of: Numbers 5:18, II Samuel 13:18, Proverbs 5:19, Isaiah 3:17, Isaiah 20:4, Isaiah 47:2-3, Jeremiah 2:25, and I Timothy 2:11-15.
The third type is - in stark contrast - much more controlled and confinable to secluded enjoyment and nonrestricted sensual pleasure at the whims and at the discretion of the many male websurfers who covertly and silently save such free display of totally-naked females for later-on lustful but private perusal on diskette, CD ROM, or flashdrive. Because of the complete nature of the female nudity displayed, and the previously-mentioned control in regulating what is seen and when it is allowed to be seen, such erotica seems worthwhile, difficult to ignore, suppress, censor, eradicate, and effectively complain about....in opposite contrast to the non-solicited partial live-person pornography described in #1 above. Though such a far-more-preferable sex show is free, like #1 above, because of the control factor, not really considered "spamsex."
The fourth type is the most dangerous, yet potentially satisfying. When one gets involved with a real person for erotic gratification and not merely a programmable hologram or programmable humanoid robot which one can interact with to a limited degree and commit non-living-object sodomy with, there are a whole plethoria of complications added to the sensual situations.
In choosing which real-person human to sexually connect with, the following guidelines are helpful:
1. Does she publicly acknowledge Jesus Christ as Redeemer, Savior, and Lord?
2. Will she allow my version of the Bible read to her for devotions without objection nor complaint, and attend the same denomination(s) church with me?
3. Will she avoid what Scripture considers adultery and sodomy if she marries me, publicly acknowledge me (though not necessarily to government) as mine when my spouse, and always regard me with overriding importance instead of any of her friends?
4. Does she desire, long for, admire, and respect me (thus romantically "love" me ) enough to become my spouse and confide her secrets to me, without being chauvenistically feminist-sexist and rebelliously independent?
5. Is she attractive enough (physically both facially and figure-wise, medically, educationally, financially, occupationally, racially and ethnically, reputationally and without criminal record, etc.) to become my spouse?
6. Is she consistently modest enough (especially during warm seasonal weather) regarding non-mopheaded decently-ponytailed or chignoned hairstyle, long-sleeved armwear, full-length legwear, and socks under shoes....so that she is not a publicly-harassing distraction, nuisance, and embarrassment to me?
7. Does she have acceptable hygiene, lack of cosmetic fingernail/facial makeup and perfume, absence of tattoos and piercings, and no other silly or noxious personality quirks, traits, or characteristics (like smoking) which would continuously and increasingly irritate me?
8. Does she habitually stay at home domestically and do needlework and household chores, rather than traveling around away from home without me whether for friends or relatives, employment or shopping - while perhaps spending my money extravagantly on non-essentials, especially without asking me first?
Now you know why I married the woman I married, and why she married me!
Of all the types of sex listed above, only the fourth is the most promising, for those who choose that particular mate-selection means of access.
There are more than two and a half billion people on this planet, and during any one of the 24 hours somewhere on Earth, perhaps hundreds if not thousands of those persons are in the process of undressing or being undressed, doing heterosexual fellatio, and/or engaging in coital insertions. Christ the Creator sees and enjoys it all.
However, both the men and women so involved will not achieve the best sexual experiences possible, unless the following elements are present:
(1) Pre-selection criteria pertaining to adequate or appropriate mate selection as stated in the seven points listed above must have been done prior to sexual intercourse:
Lev 21:14 A widow, or one divorced, or a woman who has been defiled, or a harlot, these he shall not marry; but he shall take to wife a virgin of his own people,
2Co 6:14 Do not be mismated with unbelievers. For what partnership have righteousness and iniquity? Or what fellowship has light with darkness?
(2) Mutual agreement must be made prior to mutually-nude copulation that the relationship is permanent and intended to never end:
Mal 2:15 Has not the one God made and sustained for us the spirit of life? And what does he desire? Godly offspring. So take heed to yourselves, and let none be faithless to the wife of his youth.
Jer 3:1 "If a man divorces his wife and she goes from him and becomes another man's wife, will he return to her? Would not that land be greatly polluted? You have played the harlot with many lovers; and would you return to me? says the LORD.
Mt 5:32 But I say to you that every one who divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, makes her an adulteress; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.
Mt 19:9 And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another, commits adultery."
Mr 10:11 And he said to them, "Whoever divorces his wife and marries another, commits adultery against her;
Mr 10:12 and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery."
Lu 16:18 "Every one who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery.
1Co 7:12 To the rest I say, not the Lord, that if any brother has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she consents to live with him, he should not divorce her.
1Co 7:13 If any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever, and he consents to live with her, she should not divorce him.
(3) Mutual agreement must be made prior to mutually-naked coitus that the woman will have no other sexual partners, ever:
Eze 16:32 Adulterous wife, who receives strangers instead of her husband!
Rom 7:3a Accordingly, she will be called an adulteress if she belongs to another man while her husband is alive.
(4) Mutual agreement must be made prior to having sex that the man will do whatever he can to permanently provide for his woman:
1Ti 5:8 If any one does not provide for his relatives, and especially for his own family, he has disowned the faith and is worse than an disbeliever.
(5) Mutual agreement must be made prior to naked sex that pregnancy possibility will not be hampered, thwarted, nor prevented by condoms, spermicides, coitus interruptus, excessive not-into-the-vagina seminal ejaculation, nor abortion homicide:
1Tim 2:15 Yet woman will be saved through bearing children, if she continues in faith and love and holiness, with modesty.
1Ti 5:11 But refuse to enrol younger widows; for when they grow wanton against Christ they desire to marry,
1Ti 5:14 So I would have younger widows marry, bear children, rule their households, and give the enemy no occasion to revile us.