One has to admit that Barack Hussein Obama is one shrewd dude.

Savvy . . . crafty . . . whatever one wants to call him.

He is almost like Christ Himself.

Remember when the Lord was presented with the woman who probably indeed had been caught in the act of adultery (after the purient pharisees had had enough of spying upon the jewish princess probably unknowingly exhibiting her life-sized XXX sex show)?

He neither condemned her nor stoned her Himself. (He did, however, tell her to "go and SIN no more" - something Barack has not done).

Similar with Barack. He neither condemns nor accuses homosexuals.

True, no previous sitting President has forthrightly refused to admit that marriage should only be between a man and woman, nor has any previous president been in favor of subtly promoting same-gender nuptial sodomy contracts committed.

But as Rush Limbaugh pointed out, Obama did little-to-nothing actually substantial for or against the pro-homogay cause. He merely gave HIS OPINION on what HE THOUGHT about homogays being ABLE to marry (whatever THAT means or does not mean).

And all self-exonerated homos nationwide along with their homoqueer-promotional network media should remember that yet-heterosexuality-practicing Obama uttered his well-publicized pre-November-Election supposedly-pro-homogay-marriage declaration "after consulting with his [heterosexually-female] wife AND children." Not only that, he passed responsibility for enforcing same-gender marriages to "the states" (and thus out of the responsibility of the federal government).

While the conservative religious right fumes and fusses, Obama giving mere lip service to homo-perverts nationwide, but forcing no individual mandate on anyone to get or accept same-gender matrimonial unions, Barack clearly and obviously has "had his cake and eaten it also." Then he celebrates while acquiring high-priced Hollywood-party funding with the celebrities practically everyone admires as handsome movie heroes (such as Clooney).

All the while, like Adolf Hitler, enticing homos everywhere to come out in the open, out of the proverbial closet, to identify themselves (as with Nazi-reminiscent pink triangles) with repeal of "Don't Ask Don't Tell" - for future purposes he already knows or will come to know (and we do remember how the German Evangelical and Catholic churches had nothing to say against a Fuehrer who both suddenly exterminated [using elite black-shirted Gestapo] homo-bullyboy Brownshirts who got him into power . . . and confined pink-triangle-sporting homos into the same concentration camps jews were transported into).

Moreoever, Barack is not interrogated by any contemptuous and malicious subversives and their divisively harassing media -- hypocritically nitpicking about long-forgotten and ancient teenaged shenanigans, unlike the likes of what waffling-compromiser Mitwit Romney recently has been subjected to.

Barack answers to no Mormon Church (dissimilar to Romney). He answers to no Catholic Church (unlike Gingrich). Because of his muslim backround and upbringing, no one is sure whether he WOULD answer to either Jesus Christ or Allah. It's almost like Obama is Virtual Archbishop or High Priest of his own egalitarian and cosmopolitan uniquely-sovereign Faith.


DOES Obama have the power to erase the entire National Debt with one simple signing with his Year-of-Jubilee-reminiscent Presidential pen?

How about if he becomes head of both the United Nations and the European Union? [Read about the Second Beast of Revelation chapter 13 in the New Testament of The Holy Bible].

Whatever the case, some have called it: The Fair Tax.

It probably will become the tax of the future on practically everything for both goods and services, but lamentably could probably be connected to red-laser-scannable imprinted (666-related and perhaps bar-coded) tattoos on right hands or foreheads for the excuses of anti-fraud plus anti-terrorist security and transactional efficiency.

If the consumption Fair Tax were implemented in such a scenario, there would be no need for disruptive exchanges of different types of currencies - be they numbers-marked counterfeit or genuine paper bills, gold or silver coins without serial numbers imprinted thereon, foreign currencies, etc. In such a situation, coin-collector retentions of, and payments by, monies of sundry types between private individual and groups could continue . . . though restrictions could apply and illegalizations could prevail to a large extent under broader conditions.

All recordable transactions could be transmitted in real time to a federally-centralized supercomputer which would receive and input the identity of each purchaser, location of purchase, type and brand of purchase, time of purchase, amount of purchase, seller's personal identity, etc. -- and thus eliminate incidences of identity theft and need for annual subjectively-complex and loopholes-ridden Form 1040 and W-4 bookkeeping by those engaged in universal everyday commercial transactions with government-registered suppliers. [See Revelation chapter 13 in the New Testament of The Holy Bible].

Perhaps B Hussein Obama shrewdly has already put a type of pink triangles on homos to identify them to prepare them for eventual incarceration and annihilation by enticing them to identify themselves with repeal of 'Don't Ask Don't Tell.'

And what could those of the German church during the 30s say against Der Fuehrer labeling and confining homos sporting pink triangles in concentration camps?


The advantage that Obama has over all GOP presidential candidates (except Gingrich) is that he supports funding people with welfare-entitlements Social Security and Medicare: vital for particularly older people and the disabled . . . which welfare-entitlement monies freely given to recipients of Social Security and Medicare benefits is without social-engineering strings attached, so those recipients can use the money received from welfare-entitlement Social Security and Medicare benefits however they want and in whatever innovative and productive endeavors they wish - without the sexist-feminist and racist-minority and homogay restrictions so prevalent and confining in EEOC-regulated and dreary-job workplace situations.

Also, do not the GOP presidential candidates (Romney, Cain, Santorum - but NOT Gingrich) all advocate the already-impoverished poor starting to file for and pay mandatory across-the-board flat-rate Income Tax besides losing Standard Deductions . . . besides forcing paralytics languishing in hospice to "get off their lazy butts and go out and get a job" (whether or not they can actually find one)?


P.S. [ Late-Breaking News ]

Incessantly-condemnatory lesbo and modestly-shorthaired Rachel Maddow inferred that it is abhorrent for David Barton (of Wallbuilders) and Speaker John Boehner to have and allow a Christianity-heritage-in-government meeting among statues of founding fathers in Washington DC.

Does Antagonist Maddow forget that so-called "Gay Pride" parades are ANNUALLY committed on taxpayer-funded city states across the nation?


Is Ms. Maddow aware that the concept (that she apparently regards so shocking) of homos suffering in their own bodies because of their homoperversities is simply based upon the New-Testament verse in Romans 1:27 that same-gender sodomites "receive in their own persons the due penalty for their error?"


Blessing be upon Michael Medved for referring to his anti-homosexual Torah passage of Leviticus 18:22 during his afternoon talkshow on the radio.

And incidently, Micael, don't be afraid to call homosodomite actions what they ACTUALLY ARE in the LORD's determination: ABOMINATIONS.


I always sensed that TC's AM 1130 evening-radio talkjock Neil Boortz was a noxious blattering goof in his repeated nightly rants, but I never knew until yesterday that he seems to be a bonafide "they-were-born-that-way" pro-homogay asshole. That clearly puts him into ideological bed with anti-Christianity quasi-blasphemer talk-show filth Mike Malloy.



What America needs is to have the Newton bomb go off on November of 2012 so that his righteous EMP selectively and Scripturally fries all the diabolically-deviant circuits of wicked subversives across the entire United States.

See for more, and click on 'icorigin'


In an interview with ABC News on Wednesday (9 May 2012), Obama said, "At a certain point I've just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married."

The announcement puts Obama on par with presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, who has stated on YouTube videoclips that he will not allow the beliefs of the Mormon church against homosexuality influence his proposed governmental policies of non-discrimination for homogays and inclusive acceptance of homosodomites in his administration if he gets into office.


In his interview with ABC, Obama talked about squaring his decision with his personal religious faith.

“We are both practicing Christians and obviously this position may be considered to put us at odds with the views of others,” Obama said, referencing his wife, Michelle.

“But, you know, when we think about our faith, the thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf, but it’s also the Golden Rule,” he said. “Treat others the way you would want to be treated.”

Cheap grace, indeed! Poop mixed with pudding, and piss mixed with pop? A twisted gospel of warped and obscene blasphemy?

Obama and his ilk are certain that Jesus Christ would allow the Perverted Same-Gender Marriage Standard of satanically-demented intellectually-intelligent and monetarily-affluent homogay/homosodomite activists to override and replace the theocratic Scriptural anti-homosexual Heterosexual Moral Standard [clearly revealed in Leviticus 20:13, Romans 1:26-28, and First Corinthians 6:9-10 upon which both ancient Greece and Rome, along with Britain and the United States, have originally based and yet base even-non-religious civil laws and statutes) . . along with reference to the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah and cause of demise thereof, plus copious references to heterosexual-ONLY marriages . . . be they singular of one man with one woman, or patriarchal multiple-wife/concubine harems].


WASHINGTON -- Former presidential hopeful Rick Santorum urged his supporters to back fellow Republican Mitt Romney's campaign Monday in a late-night email that ignored that Santorum once calling Romney the "worst Republican in the country" during their bitter contest.

Santorum, a former senator from Pennsylvania and a newly minted celebrity among conservatives, said that the one-time rivals would unite to deny President Barack Obama's re-election. But in a nod that the wounds had not yet healed, he reminded his supporters of the deep differences between the two and that misgivings had not yet abated.

"The primary campaign certainly made it clear that Gov. Romney and I have some differences. But there are many significant areas in which we agree," Santorum wrote, citing common ground in economic, social and foreign policy.

He added: "Above all else, we both agree that President Obama must be defeated. The task will not be easy. It will require all hands on deck if our nominee is to be victorious. Gov. Romney will be that nominee and he has my endorsement and support to win this the most critical election of our lifetime."

It was a sharp turnabout from what he had to say about Romney in Wisconsin: "Pick any other Republican in the country. He is the worst Republican in the country to put up against Barack Obama."


Former Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum endorsed his one-time fierce rival Mitt Romney on Monday, a move that will in NO way actually help the GOP's presumptive windsniffing-and-waffling inconsistent-and-untrustworthy nominee win the support and votes of impossible-to-deceive Scripturally-studious Christian evangelicals.

Santorum said in an unusual late-night statement that the two have "differences," but that he came away from a meeting with the ex-Massachusetts governor impressed with Romney's "deep understanding" of economic and family issues central to the campaign.

"Above all else, we both agree that President (Barack) Obama must be defeated. The task will not be easy. It will require all hands on deck if our nominee is to be victorious," Santorum said.

"Governor Romney will be that nominee and he has my endorsement and support to win this the most critical election of our lifetime," he said in the statement, which was emailed to supporters.

The socially conservative former Pennsylvania senator, who won eleven state contests and was the favorite of Republican voters in a poll for the VP spot on the ticket, is best known for his questionable opposition to abortion and partial acquiescence to homogay perverts.

He clashed sharply with Romney in several televised debates, but his support will certainly NOT help Romney win over Biblically-discerning religious conservatives before the November 6th Election.

"During our meeting I felt a deep responsibility to assess Governor Romney's commitment to addressing the issues most important to conservatives, as well his commitment to ensuring our appropriate representation in a Romney administration," he said.

Santorum said he agreed with Romney on "the need for lower taxes, smaller government, and a reduction in out-of-control spending."

Santorum has blattered in his recorded rants that abortion rights are wrong and marriage should be between one man and ONE woman without any opportunity for legalized multiple-wife harems.(?)



Willard "The Mitwit" (about unionized Detroit automakers)(?):
"Let them go bankrupt, as with a lot of other unionized companies."

Barack "The Shrewd" (about unionized Detroit automakers)(?):
"Give them conditional federal-loan bailouts."

And the results?

**************************************************************************************************************** Go&feature=related mp3 l-Lied .mpg


And, IF you have the time, experience: (if you would like to see personal pix of Newt & wife) followed by AND [Addendum = ]


The nude human body (and various parts thereof) are NOT intrinsically pornographic, but are at least temporarily made so by prurient exhibitionists and/or voyeurs who show or see human nakedness indecently exposed for the admitted or non-admitted purpose of potentially inciting non-marital erotic lust.