Vidclips

(revised 20 March 2012)

GENUINE and SAVVY orthodox-fundamentalist Christians and Jews insist on Newton Leroy Gingrich for GOP presidential candidate instead of being stuck and incumbered with Willard Romney - yet Willard Mitt Romney is said to currently have far more pre-Convention delegates (both "soft" and "hard").

We, who are authentically moral and rational, thus hope for a brokered GOP 2012 Convention in Tampa, in which Santorum will give his delegates to Gingrich, and Romney's delegates will change their minds, turn against Mitt, and vote for Newt. Ron Paul would be wise to advise his no-government-interference no-foreign-involvement delegates to also turn to Gingrich.

http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P12/candidates.phtml

Did not Mitt Romney learn anything as a quasi-deacon in the moralistic Mormon church he grew up in and is affiliated with? So why did he so change his position from adamantly being abortion-choice . . . to [supposedly and probably-deceitfully] becoming "pro-life?" - on something as theologically and Biblically basic as whether or not to murder non-born human womb-babes by committing and not performing abortion-homicide? Why was he even abortion-choice to begin with at all?

It's as if true-Jew Saint Paul, and formerly one duce of a devoutly-dogmatic Jewish-Pharisee Saul, had said, "I never was for G-d but instead was always against Him from the beginning, because I always hated His guts and cursed Him as much as I could whenever I could. But, later on, I saw the light, and changed my mind, so now I do not curse Him as much anymore."

The GOP's RNC, and state affiliates thereof, supporting Romney instead of Gingrich, along with "jewish" and non-Jewish network-media subversives disparaging, discounting, and discrediting Newt Gingrich, reminds me of the nazis in the movie Raiders of the Lost Ark digging in the wrong place nearby where the Ark of the Covenant had been buried.

Yours truly would strongly recommend that no one give any money to the GOP RNC or State affiliates thereof unless they are absolutely certain that that monetary contribution will assuredly go to nominate Newt Gingrich as the GOP presidential-candidate nominee. Why allow it to deceitfully instead be diverted to nominate Mitt Romney, and thus "throw your pearls before swine," and "give dogs what is holy?"

The incessant and harshly-dogmatic, satanic mantras of pro-Romney-pontificating cowardly-"conservative," RINO-consortive, radio-network-talkshow wrongheads, along with bassackward-immentality Romney-endorsing GOP governors and senators (in close cohoots with republicrats who sadistically desire to bankrupt the Social-Security-dependent poor by Flat-Tax mandate and thus force them to lose IRS low-income cutoff and Standard Deductions so as to start paying IRS taxes) . . . belligerently blattering out that:

"all republicans will support whoever the only-for-the-rich, waffling and windsniffing, homogay-inclusive, Massachusetts-insurance-mandate, actually pro-abortion-choice, GOP presidential candidate is"

or:

"all republicans (and enough Obama-loyalist-democrats and mistrusting-GOP-candidates independents) will eventually all rally around Romney" . .


. . . are deceptively fraudulent presumptions of irresponsibly-absurd defeatist propaganda.

This webpage author is a bonafide 'born-again' Christian evangelical, who would [of course] indeed vote for solid-on-sexual-social-issues Newt Gingrich, but will definitely vote 3rd party (probably aligning with the Constitution Party if Mitt Romney becomes the GOP presidential candidate in 2012 (no matter who Romney chooses for VP running mate).

Limbaugh-supportive and yet-loyal new and older advertisers - plus who for and what those Rush-supportive advertisers advertise regarding company products and services - deserve your meager and limited purchase money, and will obviously make best moral use of it for the sake of quite-qualified-to-become-President Newt Gingrich.

Boycott the sponsors who dropped and will not reinstate advertising for Limbaugh, who would take your purchase funds and give them to manipulative Obama/Romney media conspirators and diabolical election-shenanigans devil-Obama subversives.

While perusing the Tube, and encountering Obama, it behooves the sane and rational to mute the sound with the remote control button to silently watch the half-negroid, born-in-Kenyan/lying-about-Hawaii deceiver, who - with insidious cunning craftiness and weaselword satanspeak - impudently rants on while taking House-Republicans-based credit for what he and his demoncrats have no right to steal credit from, promising betterment as things actually get worse, brown-nosing confusion-and-consternation-causing sexist feminists, cowering to arrogantly-incindiary homogay perverts, patronizing Israeli Jews for politically self-aggrandizing purposes, threatening sexual purists, fanning the flames of retaliatory fundamentalist-orthodox catholi-protestants as gasoline prices disasterously inflate relating to the wildly-fluctuating yoyo-like Stock Market.

WILL lying-[Mombasa-Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born] Barack Obama brag about all he himself (allegedly) along with his democrat cohorts (like filthy-mouthed guttermind and bonafide-bunghole Bill Maher and even goof Jon Stewart) have done to keep America going during the past year? Will he take credit for what he alone and his activist supporters have supposedly done to [allegedly] keep all Christians and Jews from not going bankrupt, loosing their residences and jobs, and dying off?

Will the socialistic Chicago Agitator and ACORN ballot-box-stuffer take credit for dependable sunlight and gravity, lack of planetary destruction by asteroid, absence of volcanic eruption, and no devastating earthquakes in major cities?

For what - in fact - House Republicans have done to constrain him and his demonutzos, which GOP has facilitated continuously-smooth law-and-order operation of the country?

Will Barack "Barry Soetoro" Hussein Obama remind us of how Pelosi's/Reid's Obamascare will force the impoverished to purchase health insurance under his Individual Mandate, and tyrannize doomed health-insurance companies to insure everyone with preexisting conditions (which many of such irresponsible crippled were to blame for handicapping themselves?

Has Obama opened up America's fossil-fuel resources and brought the price of gasoline down to $1.99 a gallon like it was before . . . or will he continue to capitulate to his waffling Energy Secretary Chu (and others like him who probably want everyone to "save energy" by repeatedly turning off the lights and then turning them on again to burn out light bulbs quicker and thus waste more money) and shelve gasoline engines without first putting something adequate enough its place (and we're not talking green companies making no profit with wind generators that don't turn on when there is no wind, and pathetically-weak photovoltaic cells which product little juice when it is cloudy and none at night - all for the purpose of saving some endangered locust or earthworm per the insane hallucinations of nutcase environmentalists?

Has he enraged Al Qaeda operatives by conspiring to murder Osama bin Laden without trial - unlike what George W. Bush did against Saddam Hussein?

Has Obama snubbed Netanyahu and both deceitfully patronized yet inhibitorily worked against both Israeli security and settlements by imposing pass-the-buck war-mongering . . . dangerously disrupting the status quo in Egypt and Libya?

Has Obama put two inferior-gender, pro-abortion-choice, life-term feminists on the High Court, and lauded Planned-Parenthood abortionists - thus co-conspiring to murder scads of non-born womb babes . . . far worse than Rush inferring that contraceptives-for-fornication-insinuating females-sterilization-accommodating anti-women's-health Sandra Fluke was (by probable sordidly-lewd and lascivious intention) what he rightly inferred?

Is his intent with discontinuing 'Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell' to promote homoperversity - thus weakening our our Obama-defunded military. . . .or instead to expose them as the pink-triangle-reminiscent, concentration-camp-deserving, disgusting sinners and anti-heterosexual harassers they actually are?

Read the informative transcript available at breakingnews.topcities.com to find out!

Being that Americans already have "socialized medicine" and "government-run healthcare" with Medicare (which should begin at age 60 and not age 65, concordant with . . .

Leviticus 27:7 And if the person is sixty years old and upward, then your valuation for a male shall be fifteen shekels, and for a female ten shekels.

Second Chronicles 11:21 [NON-porn, NON-prostitute?] Rehoboam loved Maacah the daughter of Absalom above all his wives and concubines (he took eighteen wives and sixty concubines, and had twenty-eight sons and sixty daughters).

First Timothy 5:9 Let a widow be enrolled if she is not less than sixty years of age, having been the wife of one husband

. . . so-called Obamacare (or, better put: Forced-Individual-Mandate ObamaScare) should be replaced with what Alan Grayson suggested: Cradle-to-Grave Medicare.

To force individuals to buy any commercial good or service (such as a food item or vehicle) with non-free-market rationing regulations (as ObamaScare does, with IRS tax penalty for those who fill out Form 1040) is obviously non-constitutional.

Should Romney and even Santorum drop OUT of the GOP presidential-candidate race - for the sake of Newt Gingrich?

Should Romney and even Santorum stay IN the GOP presidential-candidate race - for the sake of Newt Gingrich - up to a brokered 2012 GOP National Convention in Tampa?

IF Mitt Romney and even interruptively-rude rookie-hotshot Rick Santorum suspended their presidential-candidate campaigns now, would not all of Obama's mega-funded vitriolic and venomous anti-Gingrich network media overwhelmingly attack and wear out Gingrich alone?

It is clear that Romney is a verified handsome but cultically-mormonic, deceptive and Mandate-imposing, RINO-endorsed, windsniffing-waffler, blatantly-then-undercover-pro-choice loser (as seen in http://videoclips12.tripod.com) . . . assuredly not able himself to take on Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born Obama (exposed in http://lyingaround.tripod.com) . . . in victorious debate, nor get the support of somewhat-disillusioned Obamanites nor disappointed Independents nor even moderates, and especially not genuinely-Christian-and-fervently-activist moral-social-issues Republicans (who would rather vote Constitution Party and let the chips fall where they would if Romney got to be the GOP nominee).

But, as the open-minded, non-prejudiced, and carefully-attentive reader can detect by the following hotlinked videoclip, Rick Santorum is another one who (like Obama and Romney) has explicitly stated that the Scriptural dogma and doctrines of the Catholic Church will in no way influence his public-policy decisions as a potential president . . . thus exposing Santorum as an inept, snobbishly-arrogant, impulsive-comments novice who has NOT the crucial experience, social-issues track-and-voting record, nor professionalism which - in stark contrast - Mr. Gingrich certainly has.

As one can obviously hear in the videoclip, Santorum accuses Iranian leadership of "discriminating against women and gays."

And gays?

Should not homogays indeed be non-inclusively discriminated against - no matter what type of government?

The facist-nazi Adolf Hitler ordered that pink triangles (his version of eliminating 'Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell') be put on homosexuals during the 30s or 40s and confined in concentration camps, plus sent his Gestapo to suddenly execute homo-bullyboy brownshirt nazi thugs who got Hitler into power (which noble anti-homosexual purge the Biblically-based German Christian church of course did not object to).

WHY does Santorum condemn Iranian leadership about women being "abused" and "oppressed?" Does not pseudo-"catholic" Santorum believe that nuns should have the holy habit of being dressed modestly in the equivalent of burkas and hijabs?

IF Iranian (and other Middle-Eastern islamic-fundamentalist) women truly thought that they were being "abused" and "oppressed" by voluntarily choosing to accomodate to the Koranic-interpretation general-consensus dresscode of being dressed very modestly in public view on warm days, WHY do such women (emigrating into the United States, and coming under the power and authority of non-sharia American law-enforcement) still choose to be dressed modestly in burkas and hijabs when in general public view on warm days?

Do they not see what their hedonist porn-in-motion bikini-clad harlot-sight neighbors are mis-wearing as they shamelessly and defiantly flaunt loose long hair, naked arms bared with sleeveslessness, nude legs bared with shortened skirts and shorts, and soxless feet in flipflop sandals?

Hey, like all other women in America, each fundamentalist-islamic woman has a brain of her own to be aware of what is going around her and what her potentially-licentuous options are, a mouth of her own to call 911 if harassed or molested by extremist-to-them dictates or dogma, and two feet of her own to escape to a police station - to be dressed however she wants in accord with the liberty and freedom of American fashions and styles.

Moreover, fundamentalist-muslim women are quite capable of depriving fundamentalist-muslim men of sexual submissiveness if such women thought that dresscode-concordant fundamentalist-islamic men deserved such divorce-and-alienation-causing non-reproductive frigidity. And who needs men when they could sodomize with "liberated" american women as despicable and disgusting hell-bound lesbians?

So why don't American muslims mis-dress like the other lewd-exhibitionist pervertesses around them?

Why does Santorum castigate Iranian men and women for dressing modestly, while pandering to "gays" to not discriminate against them?

Who is the true "evangelical-Christian" "conservative?"

Is it not Newt?

Santorum criticizes Iran for being anti-homogay

Most of us have heard the vow, or at least promise, required to be stated by witnesses "on the stand" who are to be interrogated by both prosecuting and defense attorneys in courtrooms:

Do you promise to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

. . . to which the proper reply is something like:

"I do" or "Yes."

Such intentions are congruent with the Scripture references:

Exodus 20:16 You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

Deuteronomy 5:20 Neither shall you bear false witness against your neighbor.

Matthew 19:18 He said to him, "Which?" And Jesus said, "You shall not kill, You shall not commit adultery, You shall not steal, You shall not bear false witness . . ."

Mark 10:19 You know the commandments: "Do not kill, Do not commit adultery, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, Honor your father and mother."

Luke 18:20 You know the commandments: "Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother."

Colossians 3:9 Do not lie to one another, seeing that you have put off the old nature with its practices.

Even telling a partial lie: "You shall not die" [completely?; all at once?] - as The Tempter did to inferior-gender Eve in The Garden of Eden - is exposed and disallowed by the above-stated verses.

Antagonistic reaction and retort is not expected for kindly correction which is justified:

First Corinthians 4:21 What do you wish? Shall I come to you with a rod, or with love in a spirit of gentleness?

Second Corinthians10:1 I, Paul, myself entreat you, by the meekness and gentleness of Christ-I who am humble when face to face with you, but bold to you when I am away!

Galatians 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,
Galatians 5:23 gentleness, self-control; against such there is no law.
Galatians 6:1 Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness. Look to yourself, lest you too be tempted.

First Timothy 6:11 But as for you, man of God, shun all this; aim at righteousness, godliness, faith, love, steadfastness, gentleness.

Second Timothy 2:25 correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant that they will repent and come to know the truth

First Peter 3:15 but in your hearts reverence Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to make a defense to any one who calls you to account for the hope that is in you, yet do it with gentleness and reverence

However, when the criticism is injust, then the opposite reaction is to be expected:

Titus 1:13 This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith

It does no one any good for a critic to be quick to condemn judgmentally:

Ecclesiastes 5:2 Be not rash with your mouth, nor let your heart be hasty to utter a word before God, for God is in heaven, and you upon earth; therefore let your words be few.

Matthew 7:1 Judge not, that you be not judged.

Luke 6:37 Judge not, and you will not be judged; condemn not, and you will not be condemned; forgive, and you will be forgiven.

James 1:19 Know this, my beloved brethren. Let every man be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to anger.
James 3:2 For we all make many mistakes, and if any one makes no mistakes in what he says he is a perfect man, able to bridle the whole body also.

And a potentially inflammatory situation is exacerbated by being legalistically nitpicky about something of someone:

Matthew 12:7 And if you had known what this means, "I desire mercy, and not sacrifice,' you would not have condemned the guiltless.
Matthew 23:24 You blind guides, straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel!

Mark 7:6 And he said to them, "Well did Isaiah prophesy of you hypocrites, as it is written, 'This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.
Mark 7:7 in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the precepts of men.' "

. . . especially when one does not have all the facts:

Proverbs 18:17 He who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.

. . . and accuses with malicious arrogance:

Psalms 17:10 They close their hearts to pity; with their mouths they speak arrogantly.
Psalms 73:3 For I was envious of the arrogant, when I saw the prosperity of the wicked.
Psalms 94:4 They pour out their arrogant words, they boast, all the evildoers.
Psalms 101:5 Him who slanders his neighbor secretly I will destroy. The man of haughty looks and arrogant heart I will not endure.
Psalms 140:5 Arrogant men have hidden a trap for me, and with cords they have spread a net, by the wayside they have set snares for me.

Proverbs 16:5 Every one who is arrogant is an abomination to the Lord; be assured, he will not go unpunished.
Proverbs 21:24 'Scoffer' is the name of the proud, haughty man who acts with arrogant pride.

Isaiah 10:12 When the Lord has finished all his work on Mount Zion and on Jerusalem he will punish the arrogant boasting of the king of Assyria and his haughty pride.
Isaiah 13:11 I will punish the world for its evil, and the wicked for their iniquity; I will put an end to the pride of the arrogant, and lay low the haughtiness of the ruthless.

Habakkuk 2:5 Moreover, wine is treacherous; the arrogant man shall not abide. His greed is as wide as Sheol like death he has never enough. He gathers for himself all nations, and collects as his own all peoples."

Malachi 4:1 "For, hey, the Day comes, burning like an oven, when all the arrogant and all evildoers will be stubble; the day that comes shall burn them up," says the Lord of hosts, "so that it will leave them neither root nor branch."

First Corinthians 4:19 But I will come to you soon, if the Lord wills, and I will find out not the talk of these arrogant people but their power.
First Corinthians 5:2 And you are arrogant! Ought you not rather to mourn? Let him who has done this be removed from among you.
First Corinthians 13:5 it is not arrogant or rude. Love does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful

Second Timothy 3:2 For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy

Titus 1:7 For a bishop, as God's steward, must be blameless; he must not be arrogant or quick-tempered or a drunkard or violent or greedy for gain.

It thus behooves each of us to be patience and search out all the facts before we utter our final assessment:

Ecclesiastes 7:8 Better is the end of a thing than its beginning; and the patient in spirit is better than the proud in spirit.

First Corinthians 11:33 So then, my brethren, when you come together . . . wait for one another
First Corinthians 14:31 For you can all prophesy one by one, so that all may learn and all be encouraged

Revelation 12:10 And I heard a loud voice in heaven, saying, "Now the salvation and the power and the kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ have come, for the accuser of our brethren has been thrown down, who accuses them day and night before our God.

In any case, it is interesting to note the reaction of King David when confronted by the actually-having-occurred potentially-Divinely-lethal accusations of Nathan the Prophet in the Old Testament of the Judeo-Christian (Old-&-New-Testament) Holy Bible pertaining to the actually-having-occurred event of David indirectly-but-directly conspiring to murder Uriah the Hittite after the actually-having-occurred phenomenon of David committing adultery with murdered-Uriah's beautiful exhibitionist wife Bathsheba (who was actually bathing - probably nude - in the general public view of David).

Moreover, there are ample indications that the Christians-persecutor-pharisee trying-to-please-God Saul actually did see the Light on the Damascus road according to the New-Testament book of Acts which (or, better yet, Who) definitively and genuinely changed him into completely-opposite-intentions-and-actions still-trying-to-please-God Saint Paul.

As Ralph Waldo Emerson's words state in Ralph Vaughn William's Sea Symphony:

Yet soul be sure
The first intent remains
And shall be carried out.

The contest of GOP presidential candidates would be more interesting, less confusing, and better for the country as a whole, if (at the time of this writing) both non-commander-in-chief-type mere-economics-professor Ron Paul and yet-pro-choice/homogay-nondiscriminating tricky-semantics, Dole/McCain-retread Mitt Romney and even less-qualified/less-professional-than-Gingrich Rick Santorum dropped out of the race and left Newt Gingrich to compete against Barack Hussein Obama for the 2012 Election.

Political-ad commercials are shown below. May the viewer of all of them apply all the pertinent verses to each of them as he views each videoclip. Keep in mind who (whether RINOs or not, pertaining to sexual social issues) has endorsed which candidates so far:

Newt Gingrich 06 Feb 2012 Ramada-Inn-Bloomington-MN
Unemployment-Checks-Safety-Net/Springboard-for-Employment Speech


Mitt Romney Speaks About Supporting Abortion-Related Choice

Mitt Romney Speaks About Non-Discrimination for Homogays

Romney-Endorser John McCain's videoclip about Non-Discrimination for Homogays is found at the beginning of:

http://pseudomarriage.tripod.com/sodomarriage.htm

Mitt Romney, Pro-"Choice" Flipflopper



Who To Vote For in 2012

Why Genuine-Christian Evangelicals Cannot Support Mitt Romney (Nor Even Rick Santorum)

Cut Entitlements?

Vital YouTube-based Romney-vs-Gingrich Videoclips:

Gingrich-Endorser Rick Perry #1

Gingrich-Endorser Rick Perry #2

Romney-Endorser Homogays-Inclusive McCain

Romney Doesn't Think Homogay Issue is Vital

Obama Discusses Homogay Issue #1

Obama Discusses Homogay Issue #2

Obama Patronizes Jews





Homogay Confronts Newt Gingrich

Alluring Warm-Weather Attire for Enciting Sexual Attraction #1
Alluring Warm-Weather Attire for Enciting Sexual Attraction #2

It is politically advantageous for Obominites to support Mitt Romney as the GOP candidate for President in 2012, because they know that IF Romney does become the GOP presidential nominee, Icorigin (and his growing number of followers!) will vote 3rd party [ relating to http://cdccmn2.tripod.com/atheism.htm ]

So, both Kenyan-and-not-Hawaiian-born Barack Hussein "Barry-Soetoro" Obama and Mitt Romney are purported to allegedly be "christians?"

Below are some Bible verses or Scripturally-based statements which you will probably NEVER hear either one quote or agree with:

(1) Jesus, the Son of God, was never created. He always existed back throughout eternity.

(2) Homogays and homosodomites will not inherit the kingdom of God.
[ Explore http://antihomogays.tripod.com ]

(3) Jesus is The Way, The Truth, and The Life. NO one (including mormons and muslims) comes to the Father except through Him.

(4) No true Christian allows any woman to teach or have authority over men; they are to keep silent.

(5) Women will be saved through childbearing, instead of committing (and not "performing") abortion-homicide or sterilizing themselves into extinction using contraceptives.

(6) No harlot fornicator nor adulteress engaging in an [immoral] "affair" will go to Heaven.

(7) Jesus Christ, the Son of God, created planet Earth and everything in the entire Universe.

(8) The Holy Father, Jesus the Son of God, and the Holy Spirit are One Triune God.

(9) Those who do not believe that Jesus Christ's death on a cross cancels the full penalty of all their sins will be forever tormented with the flames of The Lake of Fire in Outer Darkness.

WHAT do credo-Catholic Newt and Callista believe?

[ Investigate political hotlinks at http://videoclips12.tripod.com ]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fascinating it is that the Mormon Church bypasses 'separation of "church" and state' by funding governmentally-enforced legislative and judicial efforts in California to prevent same-gender "marriages" - yet Romney (a cultic mormon who presumes that Jesus, the Son of God, was created by his Elohim father and Virgin-Mary mother, and whose brother is Lucifer/Satan) has declared in a videoclip at http://videoclips12.tripod.com that his mormonic church doctrine will not interfere in his 'separation-of-"church"-and-state' public policies for homogay inclusiveness and refusal to discriminate against homogays.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERHEARD?

Guy 1: Gonna vote for Romney?

Guy 2: Heck No! Why would a guy be adamantly pro-choice for abortion-homicide in Massachusetts, and accommodate Planned Parenthood in that state, but then now pretend to be pro-life - on such a basic religiously-related issue - when he said that the goody-goody moral stances of his quasi-cultic mormon "church" would not affect his public-policy decisions as Prez?

Guy 1: So you support Obama?

Guy 2: I never said that, did I?

Guy 1: Well obviously, if you don't vote for Romney, you'll be throwing away your vote to Obama.

Guy 2: No I won't. I won't vote for either one, so neither gets my vote - for or against. I'll probably patriotically vote 3rd party, rather than merely abstain and not vote at all.

Guy 1: Don't you support any of the GOP presidential candidates - imperfect as they are - like Ronald Reagan, who divorced his first wife and brown-nosed the sexist feminists by appointing Sandra Day O'Connor to the High Court?

After all, did not Newt put bathing-exhibitionist Bathsheba under duress by ordering her up to his royal castle and getting her pregnant without first marrying her, then set up her husband Uriah to be murdered who then was indeed murdered, for which criminal act he never ever repented?

Guy 2: Callista knows.

If the November 2012 Election choice came down to Obama vs. Gingrich, who do you think so-called "moderate" [republican] RINOs would vote for? You know in your heart that most of them would not vote for Obama, but instead (albeit perhaps fearfully and reluctantly) vote for Gingrich.

Guy 1: Got a point there.

And if genuine ultra-orthodox Christian Evangelicals and Jews (not to mention fundamentalist Islamic) lose respect for Romney and consider him a waffling and internally-dishonest wind-sniffer to simply get votes, he probably would lose to charismatic Obama who has cunningly convinced Americans that "things are gradually improving but more time is needed for really-positive improvement" - being that Romney would remind such confused voters of defeated compromisers H.W. Bush (who lost to Clinton in '92 when Icorigin voted for Howard Phillips of the Constitution Party, Bob Dole (who also lost to Clinton in '96 when Icorigin again voted for Howard Phillips of the Constitution Party, and McCain/Palin in 2008 (when Icorigin voted for the Prez and VP candidates of the Constitution Party once again).

- http://antihomogays.tripod.com