It is assumed that one of the causes of many gals mis-wearing aberrantly-immodest mopheaded hairstyles (having their long hair hanging loose and longer than mouth-level) in general mixed-genders public view is to mindlessly conform to presumably-required-by-demonic-whoevers the "sexy look," which combines with their additional biological-drive necessity, manifests as their consequential attempt to cause some guy (or guys?) to solicit them (i.e. communicate with them in whatever written or verbal or other ways) for mating-directed romantic relationship followed by perhaps marital (but at least pre-marital or even non-marital) erotic contact.

The problem with indiscriminately imposing that immodest [mopheaded] technique in general public view (by gals who seek mating-intended companionship of physical sexual connections) is that most males, targeted (by default) with such non-solicited spam-like immodest-sight mopheadedness, are not necessarily desiring sexual relationship with those particular mopheaded sources wordlessly soliciting sexual shenanigans or other by their mopheaded hairstyle, probably because most men are are not currently in personal situational circumstance or convenience to be able to, allowed to, or want to initiate sexual-relationship proceedings with the randomly-imposed and generally-anonymous mopheaded sources.

Yet, because such men are sensuously stimulated (without their prior approval conveyed to the mopheaded terrorists), the mopheads cause in those men a non-asked-for confused obligation to compliantly respond to and sensuously satisfy those mopheaded sources accordingly, whether for politeness or expected importunity.

Most mopheads have not thoroughly thought through the antisocial irritation, consternation, and overall problems they are thus causing by (perhaps in careless and/or selfish indifference or even malicious secular-worldly-satanic defiance) imposing their non-asked-for immodest mopheadedness against the general male population -- most of which males even they themselves do not specifically nor consciously desire nor target sexually nor are able to make sexual use of either then or in the near future.

During warmer weather (e.g. late spring, summer, and early autumn), the same type of non-thinking or maybe rebellious immentality and dire plus far-reaching consequences of hairstyle immodesty is exacerbated and accentuated by needlessly exposing (in general public view, pseudo-excused by all sorts of concocted doctrine-of-demon irrationalizations) nude arms with sleeveslessness, and/or naked legs with shortened slacks or skirts or shorts of various truncations, and/or parts of soxless bared feet (such as toes) with noisy-and-attention-getting flipflop sandals or whatever.

It should not be expected, by selfishly thoughtless and indifferently-callous mopheads and other body-parts-flaunting female exhibitionists, that men should be expected to endanger themselves and others by simply "not looking if it disturbs them" or "turning away if they do not want to see or second-glance" such immodest impositions assaulting their eyesight -- thus becoming temporarily blind, handicapped, and incapacitated as serious possibly-illegal safety hazards.

So, what is the immediate relief for enticed and seduced boyfriends and men who most likely cannot or will not make use of the exhibitionist sex objects imposing themselves as sadistic tantalizers? What if such men have no wife or concubine to "take out their built-up sexual arousal (imposed by foreign mopheads and other female exhibitionists) on?" What if their wife or concubine is not in the mood to be the sole and soul recourse of the moment -- maybe besieged with monthly menstrual period, away on vacation, or educational or occupational or vocational obligations and responsibilities at the time?

It is vital for most red-blooded men to have an always-erotically-ready-and-sexually-submissive (even aggressively sensuous) eagerly-responsive wife or concubine for sexual relief . . . especially in our present modern American society rife and reeking with rampant and severe immodest female exhibitionism practically everywhere men go, and many men have been even-irreparably hurt by demonic feminist-sexist reluctance or refusal of their wife or concubine to be adequately sensitive and willing to encourage their husbands to initiate and follow through with sexual-connection inferences and suggestions which their husbands subtly or overtly initiate and offer.

As a result, the sordid but nevertheless quite-available options of at least covertly-sought-after-and-acquired porn of various types and degrees is the reluctant substitution (reputationally safer to become involved with than with streetwalking or other prostitutes, and far less cumbersome than seeking/finding/using actual-person bodies of high-priced potentially-somewhat-noncooperative masseuses and escorts with mouths which can be utilized for potential blackmail) . . . which dependable and savable-to-harddisk-or-flashdrive R-to-XXX pics and vids are already-assuredly known to be readily-accessible, easy and safe to search for (using non-filtered Google and Dogpile choice-words-in-search-box assists) , which never say 'no!' but instead invariably and non-sadistically present real-time ready-and-willing totally-naked/barefooted porn images of "birthday-suit" soles-exposed barity (beyond what is typically hidden by semi-indecent female attire in public view) in at least two-dimensional view . . . and thus constitute an indirect admittedly-limited pleasantly-controlled and readily-discontinuable-if-desired sexual relationship of the perusers with the harlot-type models related to their naked images resident on the viewscreen.

There is no way live-person mopheads and other sleevesless/slacksless/soxless partial female exhibitionists with real three-dimensional bodies can compete against two-dimensional internet-porn imagery, and - by webporn - afflicted and visually-abused men (understandably? safely? thankfully?) retaliate with quiet revenge for being aroused by public-view mopheads et al without prior permission, and simultaneously get rather-adequate fulfillment with take-it-all-the-way-to-its-logical-conclusion complete nudity which general-public-view semi-immodest gals sadistically withhold, do not provide, cannot provide, and/or will not provide (especially within a short-enough time span for incited men).

The overall sociological effect of all this is a pathetic, horrendously lamentable, and despicable descendance to the lowest common denominator of indecency of misattire (or occasional non-attire) legally permitted in modern American and European society (not occurring in such Middle-Eastern islamic-fundamentalist police states like Iran) -- a fierce and deplorable competition of increasingly-immodest girls and women indecently fighting for for male attention and loyalty in and with their deluded presumption that public semi-nudity is what men want to see and which lascivious licentiousness is the main means to acquire their affection and solicitation (which follow-up male solicitation can then be accepted or rejected by the capricious whims of the chauvinistically immodest females who aroused them).

But, all is not lost. Utter hopeless and humankind extinction is not inevitable. Correction and rectification is possible, to whatever extent such can be, is being, and will be accomplished:

Genesis 9:1 And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth."

Genesis 19:31 And the first-born said to the younger, "Our father is old, and there is not a man on earth to come in to us after the manner of all the earth.
32 Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve offspring through our father."
33 So they made their father drink wine that night; and the first-born went in, and lay with her father; he did not know when she lay down or when she got up.
34 And on the next day, the first-born said to the younger, "Hey, I lay last night with my father; let us make him drink wine tonight also; then you go in and lie with him, that we may preserve offspring through our father."
35 So they made their father drink wine that night also; and the younger got up, and lay with him; and he did not know when she lay down or when she got up.
36 Thus both the daughters of Lot were with child by their father.
37 The first-born bore a son, and called his name Moab; he is the father of the Moabites to this day.
38 The younger also bore a son, and called his name Benammi; he is the father of the Ammonites to this day.

Holy incest! (as Batman's Robin might say)

Genesis 24:3 and I will make you swear by the LORD, the God of heaven and of the earth, that you will not take a wife for my son from the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I reside,
Genesis 24:4 but will go to my country and to my [non-pagan, same-religion] relatives, and take a wife for my son Isaac.
Genesis 24:7 The LORD, the God of heaven, who took me from my father's house and from the land of my birth, and who spoke to me and swore to me, 'To your descendants I will give this land,' He will send His angel before you, and you shall take a wife for my son from there.

Genesis 24:58 And they called Rebekah, and said to her, "Will you go with this man?" She said, "I will go."

Genesis 38:14 [Tamar] put off her widow's garments, and put on a veil, wrapping herself up, and sat at the entrance to Enaim, which is on the road to Timnah; for she saw that Shelah was grown up, and she had not been given to him in marriage.
Genesis 38:15 When Judah saw her, he thought her to be a harlot, for she had covered her face.
Genesis 38:16 He went over to her at the road side, and said, "Come, let me come in to (genitalize, fukk) you," for he did not know that she was his daughter-in-law. She said, "What will you give me, that you may come in to (genitalize, fuhk) me?"

Exodus 21:7 When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she shall not go out as the male slaves do.
Exodus 21:8 If she does not please her master, who has designated her for himself, then he shall let her be redeemed; he shall have no right to sell her to a foreign people, since he has dealt faithlessly with her.
Exodus 21:9 If he designates her for his son, he shall deal with her as with a daughter.
Exodus 21:10 If he takes another wife to himself, he shall not diminish her food, her clothing, or her marital rights.

Ruth 1:11 But Naomi said, "Turn back, my daughters, why will you go with me? Have I yet sons in my womb that they may become your husbands?
Ruth 1:12 Turn back, my daughters, go your way, for I am too old to have a husband. If I should say I have hope, even if I should have a husband this night and should bear sons,
Ruth 1:13 would you therefore wait till they were grown? Would you therefore refrain from marrying? No, my daughters, for it is exceedingly bitter to me for your sake that the hand of the LORD has gone forth against me."
Ruth 2:9 "Let your eyes be upon the field which they are reaping, and go after them. Have I not charged the young men not to molest you? And when you are thirsty, go to the vessels and drink what the young men have drawn."
Ruth 2:22 And Naomi said to Ruth, her daughter-in-law, "It is well, my daughter, that you go out with his maidens, lest in another field you be molested."
Ruth 2:23 So she kept close to the maidens of Boaz, gleaning until the end of the barley and wheat harvests; and she lived with her [veritable-watchdog] mother-in-law.

Ecclesiastes 2:8 I also gathered for myself silver and gold and the treasure of kings and provinces; I got singers, both men and women, and many concubines, man's delight.

First Corinthians 7:1 Now concerning the matters about which you wrote. It is well for a man not to touch a woman.
2 But because of the temptation to immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband.
3 The husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to her husband.
4 For the wife does not rule over her own body, but the husband does; likewise the husband does not rule over his own body, but the wife does.
5 Do not refuse one another except perhaps by agreement for a season, that you may devote yourselves to prayer; but then come together again, lest Satan tempt you through lack of self-control.
8 To non-married and widows I say that it is well for them to remain single as I do.
9 But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to be aflame with passion.

Ephesians 5:24 As the church is subject to Christ, so let wives also be subject in everything [including requested fellatio] to their husbands.

First Timothy 5:9 Let a widow be enrolled if she is not less than sixty years of age (the age for Social-Security retirement checks to begin), having been the wife of one husband;
10 and she must be well attested for her good deeds, as one who has brought up children, shown hospitality, washed the feet of the saints, relieved the afflicted, and devoted herself to doing good in every way.
11 But refuse to enroll younger-women widows; for when they grow wanton against Christ they desire to marry,
12 and so they incur condemnation for having violated their first pledge.
14 So I would have younger women [Gr. ne(o)teras, NOT "widows" Gr. ch(e)ras] marry, bear children, manage their households, and give the enemy no cause to revile us.
15 For some have already strayed after Satan.