"God" (the obviously-by-human-sensory-utilization-and-associative-logical-and-sensible-deduction Omnipotent, Omniscient, Omnipresent Creator of Everything Around and Of and Within Us) never has, does not now, nor ever will force any human being to want to be good....or evil.

Though He has foreknowledge of what we will decide even before we are conceived in a womb, what we actually decide to do is not decided until we in fact do the deciding, and His predestination for or against us is pre-planning on His part to prepare and enable us to do whatever we humans actually decide to do.

He could (as can scientists and technicians) "force" us, by stimulative chemical or electromagnetic-sensor device, or other outside-of-us coerciveness, to involuntarily move or not move, thus perhaps do "good" or "evil" (as when an anesthesiologist paralyzes mouth or whatever bodily area by novacaine or similar drug).

"He" (with the male gender pronoun based upon Hebrew-and-Greek semantics of Scripture, and correlation with honestly-admitted environment-of-nature common sense) does, however, punish those of us humans if then as we are not good, but instead bad.

His understandably-hateful, vengeful, non-tolerating, non-unconditional-love, retaliation against us having disobediently or facetiously committed (not "performed") non-compliance against His written-or-non-written environmentally-natural entities is both active and passive, as will soon be explained.

We realistically cannot take pride in "punishing ourselves" for non-cooperation against God's Biblically-revealed and natural-law will, because whatever we would use to inflict self-castigation upon ourselves, He controls and maintains at His own discretion and choice to at least allow whatever to happen against us. However we would intend, in our pompous self-importance and "take-control-ourselves" belligerence, to choose committing either gradual or quick suicide, God Himself lets it happen by His choice.

First Samuel 2:9 He will guard the feet of His faithful ones; but the wicked shall be cut off in darkness; for not by might shall a human prevail.
Psalm 37:31 The Law of his God is in his heart; his steps do not slip.
Psalm 44:3 for not by their own sword did they win the land, nor did their own arm give them victory; but your right hand, and your arm, and the light of your countenance; because you did delight in them.
Psalm 115:3 Our God is in the heavens; He does whatever He pleases.
Proverbs 19:2 It is not good for a man to be without knowledge, and he who makes haste with his feet misses his way.
Zechariah 4:6 Then he said to me: 'This is the word of the LORD to Zerubbabel: "Not by might, nor by power, but by my Spirit," says the LORD of hosts.'

[ Those footsteps-referencing verses in First Samuel, Psalms, and Proverbs have painfully applied to somewhat-sinful-past me, temporary laid up with a fractured right ankle in a cast due to a careless accidental fall ].

He maintains gravity which we assume would pull us to our death if we jump off one of His cliffs to the sharp rocks below. He maintains the lethal property of any poison we would deliberately swallow for fatal intentions. He maintains the explosiveness of composite gunpowder in bullets we would attempt to use to blow our brains out. So He - not we - would get the credit, but not the blame, for it actually happening. God, not ourselves, ultimately is in overriding control.

God's passive punishment is when, then as, He simply withdraws away from His temporary or incessantly-errant creatures whatever we need to survive, or providentially arranges natural-disaster circumstances which we haplessly, helplessly, ignorantly, and blindly fall into, causing us disappointment and disillusionment, pain, handicap, disease, or even death.

God's active punishment is both natural (as when a hornet-type bee suddenly stings the impudent, or a wild beast, chance lightning bolt, or meteor from space strikes into disability or death the high-minded), and supernatural (relating to the prophetic prediction that God will, in the future, have His angels literally throw the arrogantly defiant into Hellfire)...affecting apostate heretical infidels (not merely "The Left" or "Liberals") who displease Him - whether even once seriously enough, or relentless incidences of despotism whatever the frequency and intensity.

Being temporarily incapacitated with that previously-mentioned limb injury, and home-bound, I recently was listening to theophilosopher-talkshow-host Dennis Prager (following the soft-spoken-sage Bill Bennett and suck-up-to-sinners, flamboyant-libertine Mike Gallagher, but before patronize-Obama-with-the-word-"President," "take-them-all-on" snitty-self-confident Michael Medved and then "hit-'em-hard," no-nonsense, zealous law-and-order-hawk Mark Levin, infrequently bloviating pompous expletives, came on), broadcast on AM1280 in the Twin Cities, and heard him repeatedly complain about the equivalent of the buzz-phrase: "You can handle (or take) anything that God gives you" - twice commenting that that "is a far cry" (in terms of comparative application to and association with) the New-Testament verse He rather accurately referred to:

First Corinthians 10:13 No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to humans. God is faithful, and He will not let you be tempted beyond your strength, but with the temptation will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it.

Dennis inferred that if he ever was in dire distress, and someone came to him and blurted out: "Don't be a wimp. Grow a pair and move on with your life. Things could be and get much worse..." he might "punch" whoever said that to him in the face.

Jewish Prager remarkably could not see the obvious connection between "You can take anything God allows you to be burdened with" with that First Corinthians 10:13 Bible verse.

First of all, it must be understood that God - not Satan, nor his demons, nor his human accomplices - is in complete and full-time control of both good and evil.

Exodus 4:11 Then the LORD said to him: "Who has made man's mouth? Who makes him dumb, or deaf, or seeing, or blind? Is it not I, the LORD?"
Job 2:10 But he said to her: "You speak as one of the foolish women would speak. Shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil?" In all this Job did not sin with his lips.
Isaiah 45:7 "I form light and create darkness, I make weal and create woe, I am the LORD, who do all these things."
Second Corinthians 5:10 For we must all appear before The Judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may receive good or evil, according to what he [or she] has done in the body.

So it is God who we should and must fear and respect with awe - not enemies against God.

Jeremiah 1:17 But you, gird up your loins; get up, and say to them everything that I command you. Do not be dismayed by them, lest I dismay you before them.

Secondly, note that upon Job being besieged by the full brunt of the holocaust which behind-the-scenes Satan caused Job (all of which God oversaw, directed, and allowed), Job did not commit the mortal non-pardonable sin suggested to be done by his inferior-gender Devil's-advocate wife of: "curse God and die:"

Job 2:3 And the LORD said to Satan: "Have you considered my servant Job, that there is none like him on Earth, a blameless and upright man, who fears God and turns away from evil? He still holds fast his integrity, although you moved me against him, to destroy him without cause."
Job 2:9 Then his wife said to him: "Do you still hold fast your integrity? Curse God, and die."
Job 4:6 "Is not your fear of God your confidence, and the integrity of your ways your hope?"
Job 27:5 "Far be it from me to say that you are right; till I die I will not put away my integrity from me."
Job 31:6 "Let me be weighed in a just balance, and let God know my integrity!"

Interesting it is that God in control did not allow Satan to over-test Job to the point of fatality, but only to the extent that theophilosopher Job (like Dennis Prager) produced a marvelous and lengthy dissertation and treatise on the characteristics of the Almighty, human suffering, and the why of it all.

G-d cogently surmised that Job "could take anything God gave him" without Job then trying to punch back at El Shaddai, the Eternal.

Job knew two things about the situation:

(1) God's justice was yet operating continuously in spite of all the personal and familial tragedy, and Job would finally be released away from his temporary "vale of tears" even though Job now and then bemoaned his existence as he suffered. Premature death was not his savior nor a cowardly escapist intention, and

(2) Job apocalyptically prophesied his Spirit-inspired truth about him ultimately seeing [in his restored flesh] his Redeemer, after the decomposition of his body by worms:

Job 19:25 For I know that my Redeemer lives, and at last He will stand upon Earth;
Job 19:26 and after my skin has been thus destroyed, then from my flesh I shall see God,
Job 19:27 whom I shall see on my side, and my eyes shall behold, and not another....

Reminds us of another reference to God's Son later on in another part of the Jewish Old Testament:

Proverbs 30:4 Who has ascended to heaven and come down? Who has gathered the wind in His fists? Who has wrapped up the waters in a garment? Who has established all the [south/west/north/east] ends of the Earth? What is His name, and what is His Son's name? Surely you know!

And yet muslim islamic have difficulty understanding or accepting that God has a Son. At least their women are modestly clothed year-round regardless of warm weather, imitating the holy and admirable publicly-observable "habit" garb of old-order Catholic nuns and the Amish.

Job, like Dennis Prager and you-know-who, was not perfect, and his imperfection (as of the others) was exposed by pre-appearance-of-Jesus-The-Son-of-God theophany Elihu (one and the same who wrestled and prevailed against Jacob one night [Genesis 32:24-32], The Commander of the Army of the Lord to whom Joshua unshod his feet [Joshua 5:13-15], and the Fourth Person in Nebuchadnezzar's fiery furnace [Daniel 3:1-30])....who [in Job 34:1-37] courageously and frankly presented prosecutorial accusations to and concerning no-punch-back Job:

Job 34:7 What man is like Job, who drinks up scoffing like water,
Job 34:8 who goes in company with evildoers and walks with wicked men?
Job 34:9 For he has said: 'It profits a man nothing that he should take delight in God.'

[as Dennis Prager has patronized "the liberal left" by essentially claiming that some of them "are the kindest, smartest, nicest people I know" - probably blathering such inclusiveness for the sake of his Salem-radio ratings].

The exhaustive and extensive musing about God by Dennis (relentlessly interrupted by annoying commercials during his pontificating) amount to what Job exclaimed near the end of his recorded tribulation:

Job 42:5 "I had heard of You by the hearing of the ear..."

But, will Dennis, in quasi-embarrassing humility and repentance, go on to equivocate what Job finally said:

Job 42:5 "....but now my eye sees You;
Job 42:6 therefore, I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes."

Note who repents and who does not repent, who is at fault contrasted with who is not at all to blame.

Prager, Medved, Levin, and all of us either have to trust God, or instead mistrust Him. One, or the other.

Will Dennis (and all of us) say, and continue to say: "Yes Lord, I trust you that you will not let me experience more suffering than I can tolerate, but I will bear my cross of shame like you did for me, realizing that you will ultimately exonerate and reward me with far more than a momentary glorious vision with you on some mount of transfiguration in which both Moses and Elijah brilliantly appeared, who were on temporary leave from the Paradise part of Sheol?"

This webpage author honestly assumes that happily-married Newt Gingrich and a hearty host of Republican presidential-candidate runners-up will support Rick Perry for President in 2016 against feminist Jezebel/Athaliah-equivalent Hillarius [alluded to in https://cdccmn2.tripod.com/girlking.htm] against whom should be incessantly applied for her defeat:

Isaiah 3:12 My people: children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. Oh my people, your leaders mislead you, and confuse the course of your paths.

Nahum 3:13 Hey, your [combat] troops are women around you. The gates of your land are wide open to your foes; fire has devoured your fortresses.

First Corinthians 14:33 ....As in all the churches of the saints,
14:34 the women must keep silence in the churches. For they are not allowed to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says.
14:35 If there is anything they desire to know, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church.
14:36 What? Did the word of God originate with you, or are you the only ones it has reached?
14:37 If any one thinks that he is a prophet, or spiritual, he should acknowledge that what I am writing to you is a command of the Lord.
14:38 If any one does not recognize this, they are not recognized.

First Timothy 2:8 I desire then that in every place the men should pray, lifting holy hands without anger or quarreling;
2:9 also that women should adorn themselves modestly and non-pornographically in decent apparel, not with plaited hair or jewelry or costly clothes
2:10 but by good works, as befits women who profess religion.
2:11 Have a woman learn in silence with all submissiveness.
2:12 I allow no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent.
2:13 For Adam was formed first, then Eve;
2:14 and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a [Vince-Foster-pseudo-"suicide" Benghazi-irresponsible foundation-cheating] transgressor.
2:15 Yet woman will be saved by bearing children, if she continues in faith and love and holiness, with sensibility.

There are many instances of United States law and enforcement thereof illegalizing speech alleged by some to be "free" and purportedly protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution - not in the sense of incapacitating public use of such, but as allowing non-restricted public use of it.

For example, it is against the law to state the words: "I fully intend to steal a high-powered rifle with scope and shoot Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born Barack Hussein Obama dead" [concordant with true-place-of-birth info at http://layleftlayrite.tripod.com]. According to major and minor network news media and other groups and individuals, the exact identity of the stated target might be controversial and thus the threat rather moot, being that the aforementioned publicly presume and mindlessly declare that there is a Barack Hussein Obama nigroid currently infesting the Oval Office but who supposedly was born in Hawaii and not at Coast Province General Hospital in Mombasa Kenya.

Not merely contrary to religious law, uttering perjury in court under oath is punishable as illegal, as is non-verbally and immorally molesting and dismembering innocent little girls.

Along those lines, a male claiming another male as his "bride" or "wife" or "girlfriend" or "husband" is not only perpetrating a vile and depraved religious infraction according to the religious texts of the major world religions, but one seriously mis-affecting the commercial interests and particularly bodies of those within every department and branch of civil government (federal, state, and local) including all officials and citizens thereof. In other words, such homosexually-oriented deviations are a dire detriment against all rational and civilized society, nationally and globally, worldwide.

Proper biological gender distinction is absolutely crucial -- not simply for lifestyle-choice convenience and perhaps-capricious option, but for the very survival of humankind not intended to adhere to an absurd despicable homogay/homoeffeminate and/or homosodomite craziness which would inevitably result in everyone's extinction.

To cause churches, synagogues, mosques, etc. to commit (not "perform") solemnizing homoqueer unionizing against their founding and ongoing religious texts and beliefs would place an undue burden not simply on them but on a vast conglomeration of people directly and indirectly part of and associated with them. It would also be an overall and far-reaching unconstitutional attack against the Non-Prohibition of the Free Exercise of Religion clause of the First Amendment.

Observe that the English alphabet letters: "his" are somewhat (and significantly?) different than the alphabet letters: "her," as are the letters: "he" contrasted with "she" plus "him" compared to "her." Such clearly implies some either incidental or vital distinctions. But is that the case in modesty-lacking hospitals, or even non-lockable unisex-lavatory restrooms?

If, then as, demented deviates (an accursed and deplorable activist minority in the opinion of the non-insane majority) mis-consider differently-lettered gender-specific words: "men" and "women" or "gentlemen" and "ladies" allegedly-"sexist" misnomers, maybe such could be mis-regarded and mis-replaced by them, incarcerated within secured quarantined segments of state mental institutions, with the alphabetic-letter designations of: "it" and "thing" (hopefully not also mis-deemed by them as "sexist" words). If such is done, expect divisive and even violent confrontation among themselves bickering which of the gender-neutral words should apply to males only and to females only. But is such the case even in modesty-lacking hospitals, or even non-lockable unisex-lavatory restrooms?

Logically continuing on, if the words "it" and "thing" do replace normal gender-specific and gender-designated distinctions, why could not toilet stalls be eliminated for unobstructed view of whoever of whichever gender happens to be sitting on the thrones therein with their underpants or panties pushed down? Not only that, but what would be the rationale of disallowing a female entering such a restroom to venture over to one or more men aiming at the urinal(s) and requesting one or more to openly display their type of penis for brief or casual observation? (Is this not already being done within modesty-lacking hospitals, or even non-lockable unisex-lavatory restrooms)? And/or not disallowing males entering such restrooms to solicit one or more females sitting on the toilets with a sensual petition to, with thoroughly washed hands, carefully and thoroughly wipe their pussies or anus areas with toilet tissue after such females culminate urination or defecation? Is such already the case in modesty-lacking male-patient-with-female-nurses or female-with-male-nurses hospitals, or even non-monitored non-lockable unisex-lavatory restrooms in shopping centers, service stations, outdoor biffys, and public libraries?

One more thing.

Contemplate the well-deserved destructive detriment of horrendous abuse which true-and-non-hypocritical transgenders and their proponents seek to brutalize with, in violation against:

Genesis 1:27 So God created man in His [not "her"] own image, in the image of God He [not "she"] created him; male and female He [not "it"] created them.
Genesis 5:2 Male and female He created them, and He blessed them, and named them Human when they were created.

Also, transgenderism obviously violates the same intentions of Law as transvestism:

Deuteronomy 22:5 A woman shall not wear anything that pertains to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman's garment; for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD your God [even though comedians and Hollywood celebrities have donned women's clothing for questionably-laughable "humor"]

To actually self-butcher, or get someone else to mutilate the genitals of either gender, makes it virtually impossible for the butchered and mutilated one to urinate, with their previously-endowed outer or inner plumbing paraphernalia then missing which was Divinely intended for eliminatory survival requirements.

A man having his penis and scrotum chopped off, then having a knife or scalpel slit up the bloody cavity as an asinine attempt at acquiring a brand new vagina, clearly problematizes urination, and for a woman to permanently plug her vaginal opening with a stitched-on-dildo fake penis also precludes the possibility of her passing pee when her kidneys and assorted parts demand it.

Against goofs who advocate or attempt such insidious bloody butchery....well...as Rodney Dangerfield might have said: "Show them no respect." [lovingly, sympathetically, whatever]

"Is Caitlin welcome within the Republican Party?"
"Only if it survives long enough to urinate without a penis."

Matthew 19:3 And Pharisees came up to Him and tested Him by asking: "Is it lawful to divorce one's [gender-specific] wife for any cause?"
19:4 He answered, "Have you not read that [gender-specific] He who made them from the beginning made them [gender-specific] male and [gender-specific] female,
19:5 and said: 'For this reason a [gender-specific] man shall leave his [gender-specific] father and [gender-specific] mother and be joined to his [gender-specific] wife, and the two shall become one flesh'?
19:6 So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not humans break apart."
19:7 They said to Him: "Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce, and to put [gender-specific] her away?"
19:8 He said to them: "For your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your [gender-specific] wives, but from the beginning it was not so.
19:9 And I say to you: whoever divorces his [gender-specific] wife, except for unchastity, and marries another, commits adultery."
19:10 The disciples said to Him: "If such is the case of a [gender-specific] man with his [gender-specific] wife, it is not expedient to marry."
19:11 But He said to them: "Not all men can receive this saying, but only those to whom it is given.
19:12 For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by men, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. He who is able to receive this, let him receive it."

Another equally-valid news report, but shorter than the previous one, from a different [gender-specific] guy inerrantly conveying the exact same premises:

Mark 10:2 And Pharisees came up, and to test Him asked: "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?"
10:3 He answered them: "What did Moses command you?"
10:4 They said: "Moses allowed a man to write a certificate of divorce, and to put her away."
10:5 But Jesus said to them: "For your hardness of heart he wrote you this commandment.
10:6 But from the beginning of creation: 'God made them male and female.'
10:7 'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife,
10:8 and the two shall become one flesh.' So they are no longer two but one flesh.
10:9 What therefore God has joined together, let not humans put break apart."
10:10 And in the house the disciples asked Him again about this matter.
10:11 And He said to them: "Whoever divorces [gender-specific] his [gender-specific] wife and marries another, commits adultery against [gender-specific] her;
10:12 and if [gender-specific] she divorces [gender-specific] her [gender-specific] husband and marries another, [gender-specific] she commits adultery."

Should we have mercy on the non-executed/no-capital-punishment possible-to-become-penitent to give them every chance to be saved?

The answer is simple:

Leviticus 27:29 No one devoted, who is to be utterly destroyed from among men, shall be ransomed; he shall be put to death.

Deuteronomy 2:34 And we captured all his cities at that time and utterly destroyed every city, men, women, and children; we left none remaining [sounds like the nuclear incineration which occurred at Hiroshima and Nagasaki]
Deuteronomy 28:61 Every sickness also, and every affliction which is not recorded in the book of this law, the LORD will bring upon you, until you are destroyed.

Joshua 6:21 Then they utterly destroyed all in the city, both men and women, young and old, oxen, sheep, and donkeys, with the edge of the sword.
10:28 And Joshua took Makkedah on that day, and smote it and its king with the edge of the sword; he completely destroyed every person in it, he left none remaining; and he did to the king of Makkedah as he had done to the king of Jericho.
10:35 and they took it on that day, and smote it with the edge of the sword; and every person in it he utterly destroyed that day, as he had done to Lachish.
10:37 and took it, and smote it with the edge of the sword, and its king and its towns, and every person in it; he left none remaining, as he had done to Eglon, and totally destroyed it with every person in it.
10:39 and he took it with its king and all its towns; and they smote them with the edge of the sword, and completely destroyed every person in it; he left none remaining; as he had done to Hebron and to Libnah and its king, so he did to Debir and to its king.
10:40 So Joshua defeated the whole land, the hill country and the Negeb and the lowland and the slopes, and all their kings; he left none remaining, but totally destroyed all that breathed, as the LORD God of Israel commanded.

Job 34:24 He shatters the mighty without investigation, and sets others in their place.

Proverbs 29:1 He who is often reproved, yet stiffens his neck, will suddenly be broken beyond healing.

Luke 17:27 They ate, they drank, they married [and fornicated and sodomized], they were given in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all.
Luke 17:29 but on the day when Lot went out from Sodom fire and brimstone rained from heaven and destroyed them all.

Matthew 6:26 Look at the birds of the air: they neither plant nor reap nor gather into [Non-Affordable-Health-Insurance] barns, and yet your heavenly Father [not EPA-feminist-environmentalist nutcases nor Obamanation] feeds them. Are you not of more value than they?