Substantial public opinion is growing, ever since demoncrats Obama, DePerle, Pelosi, Reid, etc. imposed what some term Obamacare but which yours truly instead calls Obamascare, to repeal that non-bipartisan-concocted law imposed without the voluntary consent of and input from an overwhelming majority of particularly-GOP Americans.

Recent interviews with Mitt Romney by Sean Hannity and Piers Morgan clearly indicate that Romneycare is not that much different than Obamascare - except that the Romneycare bill passed in Massachusetts was much shorter and much more limited in scope than the Obamascare (i.e. the so-called "Affordable Health Insurance") bill, and that Romney does not propose Obamascare-type Individual-Mandate required-health-insurance purchase for non-poverty-income persons nor forcing health-insurance companies to insure everyone with (no-fault) "pre-existing" conditions....although Romneycare does propose that each State have their own non-federally-regulated form of Romneycare, of which persons of non-poverty income levels will have to pay for their own medical care and thus for which the hospitals and clinics who treat those particular people will not be reimbursed with federal funds.

Romney's stated "repeal" advocated by the man during his interviews is not complete abolition of Obamascare already passed in law, but instead merely giving all 50 States "waivers" against either instituting or enforcing Obamascare.

The toe-fungus commentary of MSNBC's feminist-lesbian Rachel Maddow is of course irrelevant to the non-biased and sensible within civil society.