Patton Theme 1 (music)

Patton Theme 2 (music)

Why Believe The Bible?

Cateresy: Atonement by Ingesting Eucharist?

NO woman should orate in a pulpit nor at a lecturn
near the altar in any Christian church, Islamic mosque, or Jewish synagogue
within a congregation containing men, per First Corinthians 14:33-38 and First Timothy 2:11-14.

Love Hate

Also, NO child 12 and under (noisy or not) should be allowed entrance into any religious-worship sanctuary
per Job 6:24 & 13:5, Psalm 62:1, Proverbs 22:15, Ecclesiastes 3:7, Isaiah 3:12 & 47:5, Habakkuk 2:20,
Zephaniah 1:7 and Zechariah 2:13

Which to Wear: hijab, niqab, chador, or burka?

Three Heresies Refuted

Comparison of Various Bible-Verse Wording in Different Bible Translations

Credibility of Common Sense Science

Roy Moore and the Election of December 2017

Law to Yet Obey, or Faith Only not Fruits-of-the-Spirit Good Works for Salvation?

Dress to Caress

Just DO It!

Martin Luther and the Jews

Pa - NOT Ma!

The Big Three:

Mate Prep
Mate Exam
Mate Cert hairstylesandfashions

NO Carly Fiorina, nor Hillary Clinton, as President in 2016!

Detailed Biblical Basis for Public Modesty Pertaining to
Female-Human Hairstyles, Armwear, Legwear, and Footwear

Gov Rick Perry Videos

The Christian Common-Law Concubines Connexxxion

(Christian CyberTract Mission)

http://www.biblegateway. com/versions/Jubilee-Bible-2000-JUB

Comparison of Various Bible-Verse Wording in Different Bible Translations

All-Season Public-Modesty Dress Code

High School Graduation Final Exam

God FOR Wine!

Convention Speech to Catholics

Counteracting "catholic" Heresies


Print, re-copy, distribute, and utilize this as an Annual Mate-a-Thon Application and Questionnaire!


Bare Arms in General-Public View?

Bible-Translation Test Verses

The following two Bible verses are useful for testing whether or not a considered "Bible" translation is - in fact - a bonafide, legitimate, fairly-faithful, and at-least mostly-accurate translation of the Sacred-66-books Judeo-Christian Old-and-New-Testaments Holy Bible:

First Timothy 5:14

First John 5:7

Jew Plus+

Starship Bible

TOPIC: Pro-freewill-choice to sin, or instead mere pro-robotic instinct to not sin?

Are there not more or additional options? How about pro-freewill-choice to NOT sin?

Pre-Sex-Exchange-Massage Analysis, Selection, and Acceptance Forms


The publicly mopheaded and/or sleeveslessly-nude-armed and/or slackslessly-naked-legged and/or soxless - majority OR minority - wicked mis-using their freedom to impose non-solicited, public-nuisance harassment of spam-like immodesty of themselves in the presence of modesty-minded righteous . . . interferes with the decently-attired righteous using their freedom to see only modestly-dressed people in their presence.

Bring on the black, brown, or tan hairbands!

It's a question of who has the police on their side, and a further question of which police have God and His Holy-Bible dresscode on their side.

No matter how proficient, knowledgeable, and/or
talented a woman is, she is NOT qualifiedto
publicly teach nor be in authority over men.

[ Refer to Leviticus 27:1-5, Numbers chapter 30,
Ecclesiastes 7:25-29, Isaiah 3:12, Nahum 3:13,
First Corinthians 11:1-16 and 14:33-38 (KJ21),
First Timothy 2:8-15 and First Peter 3:7 ]

When reading Scripture or listening to the Bible being read,
take literally whatever can obviously and sensibly be taken literally.
Also, try to discern under what conditions and circumstances
Biblical passages can be taken literally, whether directly or indirectly.
If encountering what seems to be figurative or symbolic,
read or listen further for logical interpretations
or explanations which should be understood,
accepted, and applied literally.
If the symbolism presently cannot directly be associated
with literal reality, patiently wait for future explanations,
or actively search for and be open-minded
to discovering appropriate and applicable
literal interpretations and explanations.

If the State issues Marriage Licenses to same-gender (NOT same-"sex") couples to pseudo-"legitimatize" their intended
homosodomy lust, the words: 'husband,' 'wife,' 'fornication,' 'adultery,' and 'sodomy' become meaningless to the State,
and they will ultimately even be unable to effectually differentiate between 'male' and 'female' humans for
public rest-room lavatory purposes . . . plus incapable of distinguishing between 'his' and 'hers,'
between 'he' and 'she,' between 'him' and 'her,' and between 'boy' and 'girl.'

Such will be quite inconveniently and even dangerously problematic for at least lawyers, judges,
and social workers involved with family law.

Decent [Public] Hairstyles

The Christian Church of Saint Nathaniel

The Fetmem Group

DOES the Scrivener-Trinitarian Greek Text of the New Testament
state that Mary said 'Rabboni' in Hebrew
(NOT in Aramaic/Syriac) to Jesus at the empty tomb
on Resurrection Day in response to the risen Christ's salutation to her?

Eiger Sanction Theme

CDCCMN WebTract-Essayette Hotlinks

Undo Them
How To Judge
THEY Hate!
"Jesus" as "God" in Governments?
Who's Boss?
NO "allah"
Why Trust God?
Who To Be For
NO Carly Fiorina!
Set To Be Bad?
The Constitution is Lacking
Liar Liar
Rong Wird
Earth Age
Creationist Originos
Bible Verses To YOU
Law Haters
2015 GOP-FOX Debate
Sin Blame?
Who To NOT! Vote For
Trust It
No Law?
Say What?
Works Save
Tax Who?
Gay for God
Guns for Who?
Trade Pact
Fault Who?
How Do You Know?
Girl King?
Channel 7
Male Revs Only
Why 666?
Real Wine
Do It Right
Die for God?
"Like" God
Don't Come to Christ Non-Prepared
Lois Lerner et al
Prove It !
The Drain
Only Words
Un-Title Obama
Holy Kiss?
Mate Selection Manager
Feed Pigs?
Counter-Feminist Interview with Wolf
First Fruit
Nice Try

What Saves?
Spam Nuts
Save Govt
Horn Warn
Exodus: Gods and Kings
NIV or KJV New Testament?
To Think
NAS or KJV New Testament?
Laud to Who?
Third Coming of Christ?
Who for What?
Love the Law
Glory Marriage in Heaven
Worth What?
Newest Hotlinks
God Spam
Proflective Views Dissert
Pro-Homogay/Homosodomite Lavender Public Spam
Pro-Homogay/Homosodomite Lavender Advertisers
Ecumenical Chaplain's Prayer
When To Do It
Alternate Hymn Lyrics
The Discreditor
God Certification
Lalapage Login
Facebook/ E-mail Censors
What is "Spam?"
Hate or Love?
Sex Spots Solicitation
"The Way"
Tumblr Sex?
Sex in Heaven?
Isaiah 7:14 . . . "Virgin" or "Maiden?"
Chapters & Verses of the Bible?
Kill Them
Legitimate Public Sex Ed
NOT "Why"
ALL Good?
Word Use
Homosodomy Activism Timeline
In, or Out?
Bad to Rise
Slut Hair
How To Die
Life's End
Taste God
THE Rapture
Sinful Body?
Divorce-Proof Your Marriage
Polygamy and Revelation
Physicist Lise Meitner
Dress for Sex
A Rebuilt Temple?
How To React To People Without Going Crazy
Bare Arms in General Public View?
Not Enough
Yes To Sex!
Fear WHO?
Die Later
XXXtra Lass
Into and Thru The Tribulation
Galsport (hairstyle pix)
Godz Love
Group of 4 (textfile)
Pre-Trib Fib
Fault Who?
Obama Illegalities
Sex in Heaven?
Land Mines
Rod To Rule
Tax Breaks for Rev Homes (#1)?
Tax Breaks for Rev Homes (#2)?
No Escape by Rapture
Soros/Obama NPV to Bypass Electoral College?
No Sex for Them
"God" Will Do It?
How To Become a Christian
BHO vs USA Sovereignty
IRS Regulations for IRS-Registered Churches/Synagogues/Mosques, and The CCC
Government for "God?"
Why Reject Barack Hussein Obama?
The Christian Concubine Connexxion
Child Sex
How To Do It
"As Oft As?
No "Confession?"
Oust Them!
"What if . . .?"
Anti-Conception Slavery
NSA Probes
No More TV
God's "Sins"?
Obama for Abortion Choice?
Beginning, Birds, and Begging
Neoliturgy 2
LCA Red-Hymnal Scores (with Lyrics)
Dress Code - "Everywhere?"
'Nuf Said
WHO is "God"
Can't Do It . . . Anymore
Global Warming?
NO Forcing!
Depends . . .
"Right" to Choose?
Eucharistic Euphemism

The Prophetic Order

Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born liar-in-chief and pseudo-"christian" nigroid Barack Hussein Obama is very much like a disgruntled terrorist fired from a job, then taking it out on former fellow employees by suddenly returning back to the company and gunning them all down genocidally. Simply because his cancer-filled mother did not get the insurance to cover the expense for her medical treatment, which probably would not have done any good anyway, the non-constitutionally-qualified imposter "president" is on a satanic crusade to punish all Americans by forcing them out of their former stable health-insurance policies and Medicare provisions and replacing them with death-panel-czars-regulated non-affordable and non-workable Obamascare -- all in senseless retaliatory and mindless revenge for the supposed sake of his now-thankfully-deceased racist-rebel mother who did not have enough sense to marry someone of her own skin color, proving herself a wayward bitch by causing her first dark-skinned husband to become a drunk and self-destruct in a car accident, then re-marrying some Indonesian named Soetoro only to faithlessly divorce him, then deceptively attempting to artificially make her son Barack into an American citizen by loophole technicalities in Hawaii.

Her For Him
Nude for God?
Sex For God
Immersion or Sprinkling?
Mod Law
Who To Hate
Class Test
XXX-Tra Requirements
Won't Play
NO Mercy
No Permit
Zimmerman Trial
Biblical Vengeance and Retribution
Turn Him On?
Real Women Fry Eggs
Immigration & Welfare?
No-God Genesis?
For Shame?
Omit Them!
NOT Equal!
NO to Homos!
You Choose
Atheistic Nasties
Intruder - A Prophetic View
Holy-Week High-Court Homo-Wed Hearings
Go Easy on Them?
God Gender
NO Threesomes!
Jews Land
Terms for Work
Force Not!
Law of God
Tech Talk
Gay to Stay (?)
No Terrorist!
By "Faith?"
No Doubt
Meet For Sex
The Weird
Only One Way
Who First?
No Drink at Passover?
Get To Work?
Why Care?
Women OUT!
3rd-Prez-Debate Analysis
Past History, Endtime Prophecy
2nd-Prez-Candidates-Debate Analysis
WHAT is "Marriage?"
GOP 2012 election Foes
Do To Undo
Misster Chickinn
Candidate/Spousal S.A.D.
God's Falt?
Must See?
No Regs
Let 'em Grow
One Up, One Down
To Get [Much] Worse
Last Time
Voter I.D.?
Dumbo Devil
The Seder
Group Talk . . . and Censorship
Obamascare, and the High Court
Advisors (to Obama, Gingrich)
Vidclips (Obama, or Gingrich?)
Told Off
Hate for Love?
What To Say?
Tax The Poor?
Get It Right
For God Rule (#2)?
For God Rule (#1)?
Cut To Die?
God Poll
Why Pray?
Try Again
Do It Once
Sum for Sex
Compare Scriptural Applications
Past, Present, and Future?
Doctrinal Defects
Motty Pouths
Opinion Poem
Men Abuse
NO Facebook!
Serious Pun Fun
Pun Fun
THE Boss
Fake Cult?
Corp Need
Evil Good?
To Pardon
We Must Do It
Love Wimps?
Jobs To Tax?
His To Say
Jobs, Jobs
ThPuleas [Facebook]
Good Hate, Bad Hate
A Few Good Men
Funding & Apportioning Social-Security Benefits
President Sanders?
Chief BHO
Fight to Win
No Excuse
Tax Them
Pass the GOP House CCB Bill!
Since When?
As It Says.
Say NO! to Michele Bachmann
Nude for Who?
Endtime Prophecy
Greet Us!
God Government
No Limit
No Choice
REAL Obama Birth Certificate!
Gay Bann
Do Them Both
B.O. is B.S.
2012 Prez?
FDIC Fuzz?
Labor Day
Government Shutdown?
Trust Who
Customer Attire Analysis Report
Haus Kalz
JUST For Some
IT Does It?
ONE Time
It Will Be
Ponytale (with pics)
Not MY Say
God for Government
Partnership Reconnaissance Form
Partnership Acquisition Form
Partnership Deployment Form
Un-Tax Pay
Who Knows?
Who To Kill
Baby Balm
Repeal It!
World Law
Blame Gab
DOS, not MAC/Apple
XXXtra Wife?
Weddings for Concubines?
Exxxtra Gal?
Endtime Prophecy
Clothes Without Them
Clothes With Them
Why 9112001?
Earth Age
"Date" Line
"The" "Word" of God?
For or Not For
Sex to See

Why Blame?
"Whatever!" (?)
Blame Demoncrats
SotoKaga = Bad Picks, Wrong Choices
Benders, and Apps for All
Only Once
Esau vs Jacob - NOT Jacob vs Esau
Adam to God
WHO is "Clergy?"
Vote for Who?
Hate FOR God
Sexxx Need 1
Look Away From Them
Stay Away
God To Adam
Your Call
The Koran
Says Who?
Porn in Sandals
Oil Spill
To Be a Christian?
Bad Creeds
Why Confess?
Some for Sex
WHO is a "Jew?"
The Elite
"Bible" Apps 1
"Bible" Apps 2
Hit Brats
Trust God?
Intelligent Design?
Intelligent Design?
Girl King?
TFK Eulogy
Say NO! to Sotomayor?
NOT "How?"
501c3 Endangerment
Rephrase It?
It Exists
Blame Her
WHY Vote for Women?
Iran for WHO?
Defining "Christians"
"Best" Text?
WHO Says?
Believe It
Gods for War
Blood Debt
Lent Money
Who Pays?
No "Right"
FairFight Debate
Help for the U.S.A.
Yet Again
Die to Live?
Pack Guns
Dept of Jobs
Get & Use Windows 98SE
Abort Not
Foretelling the Future?
Gaza War (2008-2009)
Realty and Marriage Policy Revision
Burn Pets
Oh Sure
How Often?
Sex Waste
Harem - not Share'em
Forgiveness or Vengeance?
NO Woman VP!
New Owner
No Proposition 8?
No Obituaries
Heal Them All?
First Amendment
NO Condoms
Compare Bible Verses in Different Bible Versions!

WHO is Lying?


Choice for What?

Parallel Hebrew/English-&-Greek/English Text Bibles

Compare Different Bible Verses in Different Bible Translations!

Read God's Word and you will see
His doctrines which will set you free!
Avoid the lies of man-made rules
Ignore the hype of twisted fools.

Holy Scripture helps your soul
The Spirit's witness does extol
TRUE-textual versions of the whole.

The R.S.V. is good to read
Old Testament within is nice indeed.
Beware its clipped New Testament,
E'en worse the N.I.V. is bent
In anti-marriage Devil's creed.

The K.J.V. still seems the best
And far ahead of all the rest,
In rhyme and honest accur'cy
Though with archaic pundancy.

Along with those we think sublime
The NAS will do just fine.
And yet we need consistency
Diverse confusion must not be.

This author had previously read about a discrepancy involving two supposedly different Old-Testament Hebrew texts of the Bible:

1. The ben Asher
2. The ben Chayyim

I thus typed in both of them (one at a time) into major internet search engines to investigate.

One KJV-only diehard wrote on the subject, failing to declare that there was once a need for the creation of the at-that-time new King James Version itself, and that "the KJV" has undergone many revision and edition changes.

He mentioned "THE Masoretic Text" without defining if THAT meant the ben Chayyim or the ben Asher text (purportedly discrepant against each other). He condemned Rudolf Kittel and his editor Kahle for putting footnotes in the text of their Stuttgart-edition Hebrew Bible based on a Leningrad Manuscript - with the presumption that Kittel wanted to confuse readers by insinuating that they randomly replace the main text with footnote alterations or substitutions. He went on to state that the American Bible Society offers an 1866-incepted Letteris (ben Chayyim) Hebrew Old-Testament text for sale, but this author has never seen any such advertisement from ABS at any time ever.

Mr. KJV-only also failed to state WHY the ben Asher Hebrew Text was THE (recognized) Received Text in authority until the 1500s, but somehow lost that authenticity until Kittel's 1937 edition of ben Asher's Text - which Text the RSV and NASV are thankfully based upon.

Mr. KJV-only gave credence to a certain "Daniel Bomberg" (whoever HE was) and who (according to the preface of the NKJV Bible) concocted and printed a so-called "first rabbinic bible" in 1516 (whatever THAT was)......followed by [oh oh!]: a SECOND edition (the FIRST was NOT GOOD ENOUGH)?

One internet source stated that Jacob ben Chayyim was apparently "some jewish refugee" who the source alleged to have become a Christian (sounds suspicious)! So WHO WAS ben Chayyim, and what were his motives for trashing the traditional ben Asher Text?

With all this in mind, I synthesized three internet pieces from one Jewish author giving further info about ben Asher:

Aaron ben Moses ben Asher lived in Tiberius during the first half of the 10th century. His family had been involved in creating and maintaining the MASORAH for either five or six generations. Ben Asher rapidly gained fame as the most authoritative of the Tiberian masoretes, and even after his death, his name continued to hold respect. His vocalization of the Bible is still - for all intents and purposes - THE Text Jews continue to use.

Moreover, Aaron ben Moses ben Asher was the first to take Hebrew grammar seriously. His SEFER DIKDUKEI HA-TE'AMIM (Grammar of the Vocalizations) was an original collection of grammatical rules and masoretic information. Grammatical principles were not at that time considered worthy of independent study.

Ben Asher had a tremendous influence on the world of Biblical grammar and scholarship. From documents found in the CAIRO GENIZA, it appears that this most famous masorete (and possibly his family for generations) were also - incidently - KARAITES.

As early as the eighth century, Talmudic rabbis encountered a major challenge. A group of Jews led by Anan ben David declared that they did not accept the authority of the rabbis to interpret Torah. This group, originally called the Ananites, developed their own understanding of Jewish law based only on the written Torah.

The Ananites were stricter and more rigid than the rabbis in their understanding of Torah law. They simply did not accept the rabbis as legitimate authorities of Jewish law. They denied the authority of the Mishnah and the Gemarra.

It is difficult to determine Ananite doctrines because the Ananites relied on the Torah Text. Anan's famous adage was:"Search thoroughly the Torah and don't rely on my opinions."

In the ninth century, the major group of Ananites combined with other anti-rabbinic groups and became known as the Karaites (followers of the Kra, or Torah Text) in their Masoretic tradition of including VOWELS in the Torah Text. They believed that the Torah had originally been written with vowels, and they viewed such Text as the ONLY legitimate one.

It should not be surprising to discover that many masoretes, so involved in the Masorah, held Karaite beliefs. After all, it was the Karaites who placed such absolute reliance on the Torah Text. It would be natural that they would devote their lives to studying every aspect of it. The surprising element was that being a Karaite did not disqualify Aaron ben Moses ben Asher in the eyes of Rabbinic Jews.

Codex Leningradensis) is the oldest complete manuscript of the Hebrew Bible in Hebrew, using the masoretic text and Tiberian vocalization.[1] It is dated 1008 CE (or possibly 1009) according to its colophon.[2] The Aleppo Codex, against which the Leningrad Codex was corrected, is several decades older, but parts of it have been missing since 1947, making the Leningrad Codex the oldest complete codex of the Tiberian mesorah that has survived intact to this day.

In modern times, the Leningrad Codex is significant as the Hebrew text reproduced in Biblia Hebraica (1937) and Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (1977). It also serves scholars as a primary source for the recovery of details in the missing parts of the Aleppo Codex.

The biblical text as found in the codex contains the Hebrew letter-text along with Tiberian vowels and cantillation signs. In addition, there are masoretic notes in the margins. There are also various technical supplements dealing with textual and linguistic details, many of which are painted in geometrical forms. The codex is written on parchment and bound in leather.

The Leningrad Codex, in extraordinarily pristine condition after a millennium, also provides an example of medieval Jewish art. Sixteen of the pages contain decorative geometric patterns that illuminate passages from the text. The carpet page shows a star with the names of the scribes on the edges and a blessing written in the middle.

The order of the books in the Leningrad Codex follows the Tiberian textual tradition, which is also that of the later tradition of Sephardic biblical manuscripts. This order for the books differs markedly from that of most printed Hebrew bibles for the books of the Ketuvim. In the Leningrad Codex, the order of the Ketuvim is: Chronicles, Psalms, Job, Proverbs, Ruth, Song of Songs, Ecclesiastes, Lamentations, Esther, Daniel, Ezra-Nehemiah.

According to its colophon, the codex was copied in Cairo from manuscripts written by Aaron ben Moses ben Asher. It has been claimed to be a product of the Asher scriptorium itself.

In its vocalization system (vowel points and cantillation) it is considered by scholars to be the most faithful representative of ben Asher's tradition apart from the Aleppo Codex (edited by ben Asher himself). Its letter-text is not superb.

The codex is now preserved in the National Library of Russia, accessioned as "Firkovich B 19 A". Its former owner, the Crimean Karaite collector Abraham Firkovich, left no indication in his writings where he had acquired the codex, which was taken to Odessa in 1838 and later transferred to the Imperial Library in St Petersburg.

The Leningrad Codex (a codex is a hand-written book as opposed to a scroll) is so named because it has been housed at the National Library of Russia in Saint Petersburg since 1863. In 1924, after the Russian Revolution, Petrograd (formerly Saint Petersburg) was renamed Leningrad, and, because the codex was used as the basic text for the Biblia Hebraica since 1937, it became internationally known as the "Leningrad Codex".

Although in 1991, after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, the city's original name was restored to St Petersburg, the National Library of Russia requested that "Leningrad" be retained in the name of the codex. Nonetheless, the Codex is occasionally referred to as the Codex Petersburgensis or Petropolitanus, or the St. Petersburg Codex. This is ambiguous as, since 1876, these appellations refer to a different biblical codex (MS. Heb B 3) which is even older (916 CE), but contains only the later Prophets.

In 1935, the Leningrad Codex was lent to the Old Testament Seminar of the University of Leipzig for two years while Paul E. Kahle supervised its transcription for the Hebrew text of the third edition of Biblia Hebraica (BHK), published in Stuttgart, 1937. The codex was also used for Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS) in 1977, and is being used for Biblia Hebraica Quinta (BHQ).

As an original work by Tiberian masoretes, the Leningrad Codex was older by several centuries than the other Hebrew manuscripts which had been used for all previous editions of printed Hebrew bibles until Biblia Hebraica.

The Westminster Leningrad Codex is an online digital version of the Leningrad Codex maintained by the J. Alan Groves Center for Advanced Biblical Research at the Westminster Theological Seminary. This is a verified version of the Michigan-Claremont text, transcribed from BHS at the University of Michigan in 1981-1982 under the direction of H. Van Dyke Parunak (of the University of Michigan) and Richard E. Whitaker (of the Institute for Antiquity and Christianity, Claremont Graduate University) with funding from the Packard Foundation and the University of Michigan, with further proofreading and corrections. The online version includes transcription notes and tools for analyzing syntax.

The Leningrad Codex also served as the basis for two important modern Jewish editions of the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh):

* The Dotan edition, which was distributed to soldiers in mass quantities as the official Tanakh of the Israel Defense Forces throughout the 1990s.
* The JPS Hebrew-English Tanakh (Philadelphia, 1999) and the various volumes of the JPS Torah Commentary and JPS Bible Commentary.

For minute masoretic details, however, Israeli and Jewish scholars have shown a marked preference for modern Hebrew editions based upon the Aleppo Codex. These editions use the Leningrad Codex as the most important source (but not the only one) for the reconstruction of parts of the Aleppo Codex that have been missing since 1947.

Did the English-Worded KJV Always Exist on Earth?

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and God was the Word. That One was in the beginning with God, all things were made through Him, and without Him was not anything made that was made (John 1:1-3).

....the Word of the Lord remains forever (I Peter 1:25).

If the Ten Commandments etched in stone did not exist before God carved them out for Moses on the mountain, certainly the KJV did not exist before then either. After Noah and his kin descended down off the ark on a world devoid of any lifeforms and whatever hieroglyphics previously around (if any, whether Phoenician, Egyptian, Chinese, whatever), God laid down the Hebrew ALPHABET for Moses and the nations on Mount Sinai (amidst all the then-existing Babel languages and their written symbols occurring after The Flood).

The spoken (or oral) Bible started out rather simply with God verbally, audibly or however (without printed mass media) telling humanity to reproduce and eat green stuff (Genesis chapter 1), and telling Adam in particular to not eat of "the forbidden tree." Apparently, that divine tidbit of as-yet-nonwritten Scripture was conveyed (by whoever) to the inferior gender, who soon became the first nude preacheress on record to discourse with a snake. Her sermonette to Satan had a few omissions and additions pertaining to the intended Original Text (e.g. the word "freely" was left out, along with "midst of the garden," and a brand-new addition of hers "neither shall you touch it" was added. Thus, that first weaker-sex woman (ancestral grandmother of us all) competed against the Devil on her own, without Adam, in power-hungry feminist-"equality" arrogance and female naiivity (precursor of maryolatrous catholics who presume a female and God alone can create kiddies without any guy around) .....and so corrupted the earliest and simplest Scripture. Her usually-clothed-thereafter progenie have continued to screw things up ever since, as more and more sacred sayings were mangled by myriads mouthing mindless blatterings masquerading as gospel truth.

Again, the LORD Himself intervened to (thankfully) a male human, again. On the two tablets of stone in rock, He Himself (wrote down The Text, instructing Rabbi Moses in details enabling him to compose the Pentateuch (Torah) Old Testament according to creationist info supernaturally supplied.

God also talked to others verbally, like from between two cherubim above the mercy seat of the ark of the covenant after talking out of a burning bush which didn't really burn (i.e. DID burn but was constantly rejuvenated for more to burn (sort of like the future bodies of those who will forever continue to burn to the ages of the ages in the hellish Lake of Fire). He also spoke audibly out of a cloud, using the mouth of Jesus, out of a blinding light on some road to Damascus, and to a Peter, Paul, and John (original 12 apostles) and others in dreams and visions. Outside of what is recorded in the Bible, any dreams or visions having occurred or allegedly occurred, occurring or allegedly occurring, to occur or allegedly occur, can be questioned as to authenticity of whether or not being GOD'S actual revelation on a more or less take it or leave it basis.

Which brings us to what is TRULY canonical bona-fide Bible, and what is FAKE [pseudo]-"biblical" utterances. Jesus Himself read from a copy of the book of Isaiah handed to Him in a temple. Whatever Old-Testament books and writings He and his New-Testament gospel and epistle authors referred to can obviously be considered canonical.

Such historically happened, causing eyewitnesses to relate perfectly to next-generation faithful and honest copyists who non-carelessly read, recorded, and related ALL PERTINENT words written in common public alpha-to-omega Greek letters EVERYONE in their right mind could understand -- inerrant to the last iota jot and tittle. Dedicated printing of such on papyrus was inspired and infallible.

The Divine Copyright Enforcer had, has, and will have His ways to insure that His Word is clearly and obviously canonical ......

First, He is the Jealous Executioner. To name a few examples of the disfavored in the Old Testament who bit the dust: the assaultive perverts of Sodom and Gomorrah, Er and Onan (Judah's son's of Genesis 38), pollutive harassing belligerant canaanites who Joshua and the Jews exterminated under orders from God, Haman the diabolical antisemite (Book of Esther), 100 state-trooper sheriff-deputy-type soldiers ganging up on Elijah (II Kings 1), 186,000 Assyrian commandos (Isaiah 37:36), Hananiah the false prophet (Jeremiah 28), lying Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5), child-murderer saint-beheader Roman governor Herod (Acts 12), at least sixteen 9112001 megavandal genocidal Saudi-terrorist kamakazes who admirably murdered themselves with suicide, etc.

Second, the LORD preserved (and preserves!) the lives of his elect, providentially provides for and fills them with boundless phenomenal faith, joy, and confidence. Remember The Bomb which annihilated Shinto-cultic Jap terrorists and their supporters who had brutally demolished Pearl Harbor. Remember ethereally-uplifting Billy-Graham-crusade-choir singing.

Getting back to the Dark Ages, saints within and outside the Catholic Church faithfully copied The ONE Text which they had received from previous saints and preserved by a Power not of this Earth.

Autograph-accurateText in papyrus, headquartered in Antioch, was diversely scattered and read, becoming more ancient and worn as time went on, but CAREFULLY-copied duplicates were PAINSTAKINGLY produced, and such already-canonical Text was disseminiated in greater and greater numbers worldwide.

Inevitably, counterfeits (like weeds) began to appear from heretics such as Marcion and others who concocted corrupt Alexandrian and Sinaiticus type Greek-lettered replacements - blasphemously miscalled " manuscripts"- ultimately synthesized by the occultic-spiritualist demonic duo Hort and Westcott in England in the late 1800s, peddled and promoted thereafter by Metzger, Aland, and Nestle.

The ORIGINAL Text survived in entirety, however, true to God's promise and power of indestructibility and eternal longevity. Erasmus (respected by Martin Luther) tried to sort out the genuine from the garbage, and at that time did his best with consecutive improving editions. Beza and Stephanus continued the refinement, and Scrivener of England finally put it all together in 1894 into what is now know as the Scrivener Trinitarian Greek Text of the New Testament for these momentous last days before Christ's visible bodily return to Earth at Armageddon.

Should Isaiah 7:14 Be Translated maiden or instead virgin?

The Revised Standard Version (RSV) has, for its Isaiah 7:14, the following phrase: "a young woman shall conceive and bear a son" whereas the King James Version (KJV) has the phrase: "the virgin shall conceive..." instead of young woman for the exact same passage.

Well, which is it: "young woman" or "virgin?"

All young-women virgins are young women, but obviously not all young women are young-women virgins.

Allow no one to "get away with" being an accursed fool and blatter that: "it doesn't matter" or: "whatever" pertaining to precise word choice. It certainly does matter!

The Isaiah 7:14 passage in practically all translations (except the RSV, for example) state that a virgin "shall conceive" whereas most all translations of Matthew 1:23 state that a virgin "shall be with child" instead of the phrase: "shall conceive." There is a notable difference between the two different phrases.

All virgins can eventually conceive as stated in Isaiah 7:14, but it is extraordinary for a virgin to already be "with child" as stated in Matthew 1:23.

Neither the word "virgin" in Isaiah 7:14 [who "conceives" instead of "being with child"] cannot legitimately be replaced with the substitute words: damsel, maid, maiden, nor girl - being that some of such human females could be pre-puberty underaged and thus incapable or either conceiving or already being with child.

The "conceiving" or "already being with child" of necessity specifies female gender and thus excludes the possibility of reference to male virgins.

Also, the word maid is inadequate as a substitute word for Isaiah 7:14 because such term involves the additional connotation of servitude as a slave or employee.

Invariably most commentators have related that Matthew 1:23 "virgin" passage to the Old-Testament reference of Isaiah 7:14.

Specifically, Isaiah 7:14 does not contain Strong's English-lettered Hebrew-text Word# 1330 for damsel nor girl nor even young woman, but instead contains Strong's Word# 5959 for: [an-obviously-female] virgin.

In Genesis 24:16 "young woman" Rebekkah [albeit one with whom no male had yet lain] is identified with Strong's Word# 1330 (which the RSV has incorrectly translated: virgin), while Abraham's servant (in Genesis 24:43) requests of the Lord a Strong's Word# 5959 virgin (which the RSV has incorrectly translated: young woman).

Strong's Word# 1330 for "maiden" or [worse imposing the archaic term: "damsel"] -- (neither one necessarily already married) -- is found in Job 31:1 describing who Job refused to look lustfully at in a probably-voyeuristic porno-like perusal of her inadequately clothed or indecently misattired. The KJV in that passage has somewhat-correctly translated Strong's Word# 1330 as: "maid" ["maiden" would have been the appropriate term instead] -- while the RSV got it wrong stating the incorrect word: "virgin" for that Job 31:1 passage.

Again, for Strong's Word# 5959 (virgin) used in Isaiah 7:14 the RSV improperly translated: "young woman" but which the KJV got correct using the term: "virgin".

Surprisingly, Strong's Word# 5959 (virgin) is also found in Exodus 2:8 with reference to the virgin (not "maid" nor "damsel" nor "girl" as practically every English translation mis-states) sister of baby Moses who called her mother as a nurse for Moses at the request of Pharaoh's daughter. In that passage, the KJV uses the wrong word: "maid" while the RSV uses the incorrect word: "girl" in their mis-rendition of Exodus 2:8.

Concerned theologians (including yours truly) wonder that being Isaiah 7:14 only refers to a virgin:"conceiving" how can that particular passage be the prophesied source of the prediction in Matthew 1:23 referring instead to a virgin: "[already being] with child"?

Two somewhat-discrepant-against-each-other-in-other-parts-of-their-verses notable translations have identical or verbatim "with child" consistency pertaining to Matthew 1:23 regarding the "with child" phraseology of Isaiah 7:14, and they are:

NASB (of Isaiah 7:14) =

"Therefore the Lord Himself [himself?] will give you a sign: Behold [Look?], a [the?] [young?] virgin will be [is?] with child and [shall?] [will?] bear a son, and [she?] will [shall?] call His name [name him?] Immanuel."


NRSV (of Isaiah 7:14) =

"Therefore the Lord himself [Himself?] will give you a sign. Look [Behold?], the [a?] [young?] woman [should instead read: virgin] is [will be?] with child and [shall?] [will?] bear a son, and [she?] shall [will?] name him [call his name?] Immanuel."

Some say it is "irrelevant:"
The Virgin Birth a "true event"?
Presuming resurrection might have been
A hoax occurring way back when.

The miracles that Jesus did
Were myths of those who flipped their lid?
And all that did had THIS result:
Imposing one more WACKO cult?

Though skeptics have been proven wrong
The righteous saints still sing God's song,
Satanic doubters scoff The Way
Till Christ returns on Judgment Day! 507b.html

The Glory of the Cross 507b
Tune: W. C. Givens, 1908; Arranged by Syble (Wootten) Adams, 2010
Lyrics: Isaac Watts, 1707
Meter: Common Meter (8,6,8,6)


I'm not ashamed to own my Lord,
Or to defend His cause;
Maintain the honor of His word,
The glory of His cross.

Jesus, my God, I know His name,
His name is all my trust;
Nor will He put my soul to shame,
Nor let my hope be lost.

There will He own my worthless name,
Before His Father's face,
And in the New Jerusalem,
Appoint my soul a place.


Given's song was written January 26, 1908.

Feel free to e-mail compliments or criticisms to:

The Christian Concubine Connexxxion